Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

To Study the Effect of Gluteus Maximus Activation in Sub Acute Mechanical Low Back Pain


Affiliations
1 Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Distt. Patiala (PUNJAB), India
2 Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Ram Nagar, Distt. Patiala (PUNJAB), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Introduction: Patients with low back pain (LBP) present at different points in its genesis, with symptom severity and effects on quality of life a major factor in the timing of presentation. Gluteus maximus, biceps femoris along with paraspinal muscles are the most important muscles of the group. There is group action of all these muscles in a particular sequence which is necessary for smooth spinal movements and stabilized spine during dynamic state of the body.

Methodology:

Study design: Experimental

Study setting: Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital Patiala

Sampling: Random sampling technique

Sample size: 30 patients in group A which is control group and 30 patients in group B which is experimental group.

30 patients were included in 2 groups each group 1 was treated with routine physiotherapy as control group whereas group 2 was treated with routine physiotherapy along with gluteus maximus activation (isometric contraction of gluteus maximus in lengthened position). Outcome measures were taken in terms of VAS scale before and after the treatment daily for 10 days.

Result: Group 2 treated with gluteus maximus activation got relief early than group 1 although group 1 also got relief but took more number of days when compared with group 2.

Conclusion: Gluteus maximus activation should also be considered while treating mechanical low back pain.


Keywords

Mechanical Low Back Pain, Gluteus Maximus Activation, Lumbopelvic Junction
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Borenstein DG and Weasel S W (1995) Low back pain: Medical Diagnosis and Comprehensive Management, W B saunders Co. London Page 189.

  • Joshua C (1999) Injury Management Update. www.dubinchiro.com.

  • Kamala S and Marc O S (1999a) Exercise prescription, foundation of therapeutic exercise classification and prescription, Medical Publishers, Philadelphia Page 38.

  • Kamala S and Marc O S (1999b) Exercise prescription, foundation of therapeutic exercise classification and prescription, Medical Publishers, Philadelphia Pages 42-43.

  • Lewitt K (1995) Manipulative therapy in rehabilitation of the motor system. Butterworths London.

  • Leinonen V (2000), Back and hip extensor activities during trunk flexion/extension: effects of low back pain and rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 81: 32-37.

  • Nadler S F (2002) Hip muscle imbalance and low back pain in athletes: influence of core strengthening. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 34, No. 1, pages 9-16.

  • Roger C (2007) Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline Portland, American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society.

  • Susan L Edmond (2006) Joint mobilization/manipulation, extremity and spinal techniques. Second edition Mosby, Elsevier, St Louis, Missouri.

  • Veeling A and Stoeckart, (1995) The posterior layer of the thoracolumber fascia: its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine 20: Pages 753-758.

  • Pope MH, DeVocht JW (1999), Low back pain. The clinical relevance of Biomechanics. Neurol Clin; 17: 18-41.


Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 0




  • To Study the Effect of Gluteus Maximus Activation in Sub Acute Mechanical Low Back Pain

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rajiv Sharma
Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Distt. Patiala (PUNJAB), India
Subhash Mahajan
Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital, Ram Nagar, Distt. Patiala (PUNJAB), India
Jagmohan Singh
Gian Sagar College of Physiotherapy, Ram Nagar, Distt. Patiala (PUNJAB), India

Abstract


Introduction: Patients with low back pain (LBP) present at different points in its genesis, with symptom severity and effects on quality of life a major factor in the timing of presentation. Gluteus maximus, biceps femoris along with paraspinal muscles are the most important muscles of the group. There is group action of all these muscles in a particular sequence which is necessary for smooth spinal movements and stabilized spine during dynamic state of the body.

Methodology:

Study design: Experimental

Study setting: Gian Sagar Medical College and Hospital Patiala

Sampling: Random sampling technique

Sample size: 30 patients in group A which is control group and 30 patients in group B which is experimental group.

30 patients were included in 2 groups each group 1 was treated with routine physiotherapy as control group whereas group 2 was treated with routine physiotherapy along with gluteus maximus activation (isometric contraction of gluteus maximus in lengthened position). Outcome measures were taken in terms of VAS scale before and after the treatment daily for 10 days.

Result: Group 2 treated with gluteus maximus activation got relief early than group 1 although group 1 also got relief but took more number of days when compared with group 2.

Conclusion: Gluteus maximus activation should also be considered while treating mechanical low back pain.


Keywords


Mechanical Low Back Pain, Gluteus Maximus Activation, Lumbopelvic Junction

References