Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study of Comparision of Quadriceps Angle in Normal Young Adults and Older Individuals


Affiliations
1 College of Applied Education and Health Sciences, Meerut, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objectives: To evaluate the values of Q- angle in normal young adults and older individuals and to determine whether those values differed in young adults and older individuals.

Procedure: Convenient sample of n=31 were recruited from CAEHS Meerut and some were residents of the Meerut city. All subjects were informed about the procedure and purpose of the study and their demographic details were taken. The total subjects were divided into 2 groups on the basis of inclusion criteria. Group A included younger individuals between the age group of 19-25 years, Group B included older individuals between age group of 50-65 years. Measurement was taken in supine and standing position. Anatomical landmarks including the border of the patella, were palpated and the center of the patella marked by marker and then joined by the use of a scale and a marker. With the pivot of the goniometer placed on the midpoint of the patella, the stationary arm on the line adjoining the ASIS to mid-point of the patella, and the moveable arm placed over the line adjoining the tibia tubercle to the mid-point of the patella. The angle thus formed between the two arms of the goniometer was then measured and recorded as the Q- angle.

Results: Result were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 window, using the t test. The study revealed older individuals had more Q- angle as compared to the young adults.

Conclusion: There is significant difference in Q-angle between younger and older individuals with older individuals have more Q- angle than younger individuals.


Keywords

Quadriceps Angle, Universal Goniometer
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Hungerford DS, Barry M. Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Clin orthop relates 1979; 144: 9-15.

  • Havid I. The stability of the human patella-femoral joint. Eng Med 1983; 12: 55-59.

  • Horton HG, Hall TL. Quadriceps muscle angle normal value and relationship with gender and selected measure. Phy ther. 1989; 69: 897-901.

  • Puniello MS. Iliotibial band tightness and medical patellar glide in patient with patella-femoral dysfunction. J Orthop sports phys ther. 1993; 17: 144-148.

  • Livingston LA, Mandigo JL. Bilateral within subject Q angle asymmetry in young adult female and males. Biomed sci Instrum.1997;33:112-117.

  • Silver, D. Measurment of the range of motion joints joints. bone joint surg.1923; 21:569.

  • Hubbard JK, Sampson HW, Elledge JR. Prevalence and morphology of the vastus medialis oblique muscle in human cadavers. Anat Rec.1997;249: 135-142.

  • Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris angle: normal values and relationship with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys Ther. 1989; 69: 897-901.

  • Woodland LH, Francis RS. Parameters and comparison of the quadriceps angle of college aged men and women in the supine and standing position. The AM J sports med 1992; 20: 208-2011.

  • Byl T. And L.A. Livingston. Bilateral imbalance in Q- angle and quadriceps peak torque measurement.1999

  • Bryan C. HEIDERSCHEIT, Joseph Hamill, and Richard E.A. et al. Q- angle influence on the variability of lower extremity co-ordination during running. Med sci in sports and exercise.1999; 31:1313-1319.

  • Lori A. Livingston and Sandi J. Spauulding.OPTOTRAK measurement of the quadriceps angle using standardization foot position. J Athl. Train. 2002; 37: 252-255.

  • Huston LT Green field ML, et al. anterior cruciate ligament injuries in females athletes potential risk fectof. Cin ortgop.2000; 373: 50-63.

  • T Puckree A Govender, K Govenderet al. The quadriceps angle and the incidence of knee injury in Indian long distance runners. 2007; 19:9-11.

  • Mohammad- Jafar Emami, Mohammad- Hossein Ghahramani et al. Q- angle an invaluable parameter for evaluation of anterior knee pain. Arch Iranian med 2007: 10: 24- 26.

  • Akinbo Sra, Tella Ba et al. Comparison of bilateral quadriceps angle asymptomatic and symptomatic males with unilateral anterior knee pain. The internet journal of pain, symptoms, control and palliative care 2008; 6: 1528- 8277.

  • Bade B. Omololu, et al. Normal Q- angle in adult’s Nigerian population. 2008; 1-7.

  • Aparna Sarkar, Shaily Razdan et al. Effect of isometric quadriceps activation on Q- angle in females. Indian j physiol pharmacol. 2009; 53: 275-278.

  • Veeramani Raveendranath et al. The Q- angle in Indian men and women. EURJ Anta. 2009; 13: 105- 109.

  • Jaiyesimi, A.O and Jegede, O.O. influence of gender and leg dominance on Q- angle among young adults Nigerians. AJARS. 2009; 1: 18- 23.

  • Hahn T, Foldspang A. The Q- angle and sports.scand j med csi sports.1997; 7: 43-48.


Abstract Views: 408

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study of Comparision of Quadriceps Angle in Normal Young Adults and Older Individuals

Abstract Views: 408  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Komal Singh
College of Applied Education and Health Sciences, Meerut, India
Renu Chauhan
College of Applied Education and Health Sciences, Meerut, India

Abstract


Objectives: To evaluate the values of Q- angle in normal young adults and older individuals and to determine whether those values differed in young adults and older individuals.

Procedure: Convenient sample of n=31 were recruited from CAEHS Meerut and some were residents of the Meerut city. All subjects were informed about the procedure and purpose of the study and their demographic details were taken. The total subjects were divided into 2 groups on the basis of inclusion criteria. Group A included younger individuals between the age group of 19-25 years, Group B included older individuals between age group of 50-65 years. Measurement was taken in supine and standing position. Anatomical landmarks including the border of the patella, were palpated and the center of the patella marked by marker and then joined by the use of a scale and a marker. With the pivot of the goniometer placed on the midpoint of the patella, the stationary arm on the line adjoining the ASIS to mid-point of the patella, and the moveable arm placed over the line adjoining the tibia tubercle to the mid-point of the patella. The angle thus formed between the two arms of the goniometer was then measured and recorded as the Q- angle.

Results: Result were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 window, using the t test. The study revealed older individuals had more Q- angle as compared to the young adults.

Conclusion: There is significant difference in Q-angle between younger and older individuals with older individuals have more Q- angle than younger individuals.


Keywords


Quadriceps Angle, Universal Goniometer

References