Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Correlation of Cranio-vertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion with Pain, Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Indian Population


Affiliations
1 Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
2 Indian Spinal Injury Centre, New Delhi, India
3 AIIMS, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Study Objective: To determine correlation of cranio-vertebral angle and cervical range of motion with pain, severity of symptoms and functional status in patients with CTS.

Study Design: Correlation study design.

Methods: A total number of 60 patients were included in the study. Pain intensity was assessed by VAS&Boston questionnaire was used for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status. FHP was assessed in standing position, a side-view picture were taken and cranio-vertebral angle was measured using a digitizing software. CROM was measured using a full circle goniometer.

Results: Karl Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation of CV angle&CROM with parameters of CTS. The results indicated that patients with CTS have a forward head posture and restricted cervical range of motion. But no significant correlation was found of FHP and CROM with parameters of pain, severity and functional status of CTS.

Conclusions: A cause and effect relationship cannot be concluded from this study. Since, no significant correlation was found between any of the variables, so our null hypothesis is accepted.


Keywords

Forward Head Posture, Cervical Range of Motion, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Isam Atroshi. Prevalence of Carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA, July 14,1999-vol 281(2).

  • George S.Phalen. The Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome,17yrs experience in diagnosis & treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands.The Journal of Bone & Joint surgery.1966;vol 48-A(2).

  • Frans J M Bongers. Carpal tunnel syndrome in general practice (1987 and 2001); incidence & the role of occupational factors. British journal of general practice, Jan 2007;57;36-39.

  • Brent S. Russell. Carpal tunnel syndrome and the “double crush” hypothesis : a review and implications for chiropractic. Chiropractic & Osteopathy.2008,16:2.

  • Ana I. De-La-Llave-Rincon. Increased Forward head posture & restricted Cervical range of motion in patients with Carpal tunnel syndrome. JOSPT, Sep 2009,39(9).

  • C.C.Donaldson.Potential contributions of neck muscle dysfunctions to initiation and maintenance of carpal tunnel syndrome. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, Vol.23, No.1, 1998.2009, 39(9).

  • Norkins, C.White.A guide to goniometry.

  • Frank L.Tinel’s sign and Phalen’s maneuver : Physical signs of carpal tunnel syndrome.

  • Lawrence C.Hurst. The relationship of the double crush to carpal tunnel syndrome (An analysis of 1000 cases of CTS). The Jr of Hand Surgery.1984.

  • Roy P.Walmsley.The effect of initial head position on active cervical axial rotation range of motion in two age populations. Spine.Vol 21,No.21, 2435-2442.

  • Jennifer M. Medina McKeon. Neural gliding techniques for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a systemic review. Jr of Sports Rehab,2008,17,324-341.

  • Kurt A.Mariano.Double crush syndrome: Chiropractic care of an entrapment neuropathy.Jr manipulative physiol ther 1991;14:262-265.

  • Hee-Kyu Kwon. Frequency and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome according to level of cervical radiculopathy: Double crush syndrome? Clinical Neurophysiology 117 (2006) 1256-1259.

  • Joseph S. Ferezy. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a case report. Chiropractic technique. Jan: 1989.

  • Richard Valente. Chiropractic Manipulation in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Jr. of Manipulative and Phsiological therapeutics Vol.17 (4): May 1994.

  • Bednarik J: Median nerve mononeuropathy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: double crush syndrome? J Neurol 1999. 246: 544-551.

  • Isabel Reading: Anatomic Distribution of Sensory Symtoms in the Hand and Their Relaation to Neck Pain, Psychosocial Variables, and Occupational Activties. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:524-530.

  • Claude Pierre-Jerome: Magnetic Resonance Assessment of the Double- Crush phenomenon in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A bilateral Quantitative study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand surg 2003; 37: 46-53.

  • Andrian R. M. Upton: The Double Crush in Nerve-Entrapment Syndromes.The Lancet Aug, 1973.

  • Nathaniel R. Cervical flexion, extension, protrusion and retraction. Spine. Vol 24,No.3; 240-247.


Abstract Views: 361

PDF Views: 0




  • Correlation of Cranio-vertebral Angle and Cervical Range of Motion with Pain, Severity of Symptoms and Functional Status in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Indian Population

Abstract Views: 361  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Shilpi Mateen
Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
Sohrab A. Khan
Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi, India
Meena Makhija
Indian Spinal Injury Centre, New Delhi, India
Smita Das
AIIMS, India

Abstract


Study Objective: To determine correlation of cranio-vertebral angle and cervical range of motion with pain, severity of symptoms and functional status in patients with CTS.

Study Design: Correlation study design.

Methods: A total number of 60 patients were included in the study. Pain intensity was assessed by VAS&Boston questionnaire was used for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status. FHP was assessed in standing position, a side-view picture were taken and cranio-vertebral angle was measured using a digitizing software. CROM was measured using a full circle goniometer.

Results: Karl Pearson correlation was used to study the correlation of CV angle&CROM with parameters of CTS. The results indicated that patients with CTS have a forward head posture and restricted cervical range of motion. But no significant correlation was found of FHP and CROM with parameters of pain, severity and functional status of CTS.

Conclusions: A cause and effect relationship cannot be concluded from this study. Since, no significant correlation was found between any of the variables, so our null hypothesis is accepted.


Keywords


Forward Head Posture, Cervical Range of Motion, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

References