Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Dominant Hand Training on Intermanual Transfer to Sub Dominant Hand in Patients with Cerebral Tumors


Affiliations
1 Delhi Society for Welfave of Special Children, Okhla, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Back ground and purpose The purpose of this study was to find out there is any effect of dominant hand training (RT), on intermanual transfer to subdominant hand (LT) in patients after cerebral tumor surgery. Subjects and methods Subjects were 32 patients with the mean age of 48.21±5.85, height 166.56±6.23 cms, and mean weight 67.68±5.03 kgs with upper limb weakness secondary to cerebral tumors. Using peg board to analyze motor performance. Raw scores were standardized for data analysis using paired't' test under SPSS 11 windows software. Results Over the 2 weeks period the experimental group patients has significantly shown improvement. Reduction in mean time to complete the task on dominant hand is 74.38±9.57 sec to 63.25±8.69 sec and in non dominant hand 145.81±12.58 sec to 139.94±12.41 sec. But in control group has no significant difference (p=0.0018) and the task 73±10.41 sec to 72±10.24 sec. Conclusion and discussion The findings suggest that the task improvement is only by intermanual transfer. So that measuring changed in experimental group. But in control group sufficient improvement only by familiarization of the task though clinically significant.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Martin D. Abeloff, James O, Armitage, Clinical Oncology.(1997) Edited by Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.New York.

  • Darcy A.Umphred , Neurological Rehabilitation . Fourth Edition.

  • Huang ME, Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L. Functional outcome after brain tumor and acute stroke: a comparative analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998 Nov;79(11):1386-90.

  • Cortex (2002) 38:805 -815 :- Intermanual transfer in a simple motor task.

  • Need of surgery. Martin .D, Abelott et al, (1995). Churchill Livingstone.

  • F.A.Hellabrandt . MD., Annie.M.Panish .B.S., Archives of Physical Medicine, 1947 February The influence of unilateral exercises on the contralateral limb.

  • Alexander Lenhard and Joachim Hoffmann, Intermanual learning transfer.

  • Gregor Thut, Ulrike Halsband, Behavioral Brain Research, 89 ( 1997) 129-134 :- Intermanual transfer of training; blood flow correlates in the human brain . 9. Eliot Hazeltine, Wesley K. Nurses and Richard B. Ivry.

  • Journal of Neurophysiology (2003) 90: 2409-2418.The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses.

  • G.Tassinari, S.Aglioti, R.Pallini,G.Beluechi. Behavioral Brain Research (1994) 64: 141-49. Interhemispheric integration of simple visuomotor responses in patients with partial callosal defects.

  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience :2001:13:8:1071– 79:- Posterior corpus collosum and Interhemispheric transfer of somatosensory information: A Functional M.R.I. and Neuropsychological study of a partially callosotomised patient.

  • Ulf.Ziemann, Kenji Ishii, Alessamdra Bargheresi. Journal of Physiology (1999) 518.3, 897-906. Dissociation of pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralalteral motor evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles.

  • Sophie Vanghelume, Veerle Puttemans, Behavioral Brain Research, 154 (2004), 535-547 :-Inter and Intra- limb transfer of a bimanual task; Generalisability of limb dissociation.

  • Journal of Neurophysiology (2003): 89:168-178:- Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to non-dominant arm.

  • Gregor Thut, Claude – Alain Hauert, et,al. Experimental Brain Research (1999)128:256- 61.Evidence for hemispheric motor level transfer in a simple reaction time task, an EEG study.

  • Medicine and science in sports and exercise 37(9), 1594-1600, September 2005:-Cross education of arm Muscular Strength in unidirectional in Right-Handed individuals.

  • Ryuta Kawashima, Michikazu matsumura, Norihiri Sadato, ET,AL. European Journal of Neuroscience: Volume:10 :2254-2260(1998). Regional cerebral blood flow changes in human brain related to ipsilateral and contralateral complex hand movements.

  • Teixeira.L.A., Brain Cognition, 2000 December; 44(3); 455-69 :- Timing and force components in the bilateral transfer of learning.

  • Y.Yasuda, [M.Miyamurra]. European Journal of Applied Physiology (1983 ),51, 31-329 :- Cros transfer effects of Muscular training on blood flow in the ipsilateral and contralateral forearms.

  • Megan E.Andree, Kinsnk.K.Maitra, Intermanual transfer of a anew writing occupation in young adults without disability.

  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitaiton (2003) Volume: 84 :432-443:- Training with an upper limb prosthetic simulation to enhance transfer of skill across limbs.

  • Jean–Luc Velay, Simone Benoit-Dubro Card. Neuropsycholagia- 37(1999) 895-903.

  • Augusto Teixeira, Luis, Laterality : Assymetrics of Body, Brain and Cognition.Volume II, January 2006, pp. 43-56 (14):- Intermanual transfer of [learning] control between tasks holding different levels of motor complexity.

  • Luis Augusto Teixeira and Leandro [Quedus ] Cominha, Intermanual transfer of force control is modulated by asymmetry of muscular strength.

  • Gregor Thut, Vlrike Haliband; Experimental Brain Research (1997) 113; 365-370 :- What is the role of the Corpus Callosum in intermanual transfer of Motor skills? A study of three cases with Callosal pathology.

  • Kumar. S., Mandal.M.K., Laterality 2005 July; 10(4); 337-44:- Bilateral transfer of skill in left and right handers.

  • Experimental Brain Research (2002) 146:369 -378:- Motor Learning sequence with the non-dominant left hand.

  • C.J.Winstein, P.S.Pohi . Experimental Brain Research (1995):105:163-174 .Effects of Unilateral brain damage on the control of goal directed hand movements.

  • Gregor Thut, Naman D. Cook, Marianne Regard. Experimental Brain Research (1996) 108:321-27. Intermanual transfer of proximal and distal motor engrams in humans.

  • Ritsuko Hanajima, Yasno Terao; Jouranl of Physiology (2001), 531.3, pp.849-859:- Interhemispheric facilitation of the hand motor area in humans.

  • Annett M; Left, Right, Hand, Brain.; The right shift theory. London Erlbaum. (1985).

  • Dayen AL and Carlier M. Measuring handedness. A validations study of Bishop’s reaching card test. Laterality. (1964).

  • Iacoboni M Woods RP and Mazziotta J.C. Bimodel auditory and visual left fronto parietal circuitry for sensorimotor integration and sensorimotor learning. Brain 121; 2135-2143. (1998).

  • Janckle L et al . f MRI study of bimanual co-ordination. Neuropsychologia 38; 164-174. (2000).

  • Lutz et al. Tapping movements according to regular and irregular visual timing signals investigated with MRI. Neuroreport. 11; 1301-1306; (2000).

  • Penhune et al. Cerebellar contributions to motor training. A PET study of auditory and visual rhythm reproducction. Journal of cognotive neurosciences, 10; 752-765. 1998.

  • R.C Old field.Neuropsychlogia (1971). Vol 9; 99-113. the analysis of handedness; the edinburhg inventory.

  • Susan B.O’Sullivan. Physical Rehabilitation, Assessment and Treatment. Fourth Edition. Jaypee Brothers. P.B.No:7193, New Delhi. India. 2001.


Abstract Views: 315

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Dominant Hand Training on Intermanual Transfer to Sub Dominant Hand in Patients with Cerebral Tumors

Abstract Views: 315  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

D. Satheesh
Delhi Society for Welfave of Special Children, Okhla, New Delhi, India
Ajay Sharma
Delhi Society for Welfave of Special Children, Okhla, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Back ground and purpose The purpose of this study was to find out there is any effect of dominant hand training (RT), on intermanual transfer to subdominant hand (LT) in patients after cerebral tumor surgery. Subjects and methods Subjects were 32 patients with the mean age of 48.21±5.85, height 166.56±6.23 cms, and mean weight 67.68±5.03 kgs with upper limb weakness secondary to cerebral tumors. Using peg board to analyze motor performance. Raw scores were standardized for data analysis using paired't' test under SPSS 11 windows software. Results Over the 2 weeks period the experimental group patients has significantly shown improvement. Reduction in mean time to complete the task on dominant hand is 74.38±9.57 sec to 63.25±8.69 sec and in non dominant hand 145.81±12.58 sec to 139.94±12.41 sec. But in control group has no significant difference (p=0.0018) and the task 73±10.41 sec to 72±10.24 sec. Conclusion and discussion The findings suggest that the task improvement is only by intermanual transfer. So that measuring changed in experimental group. But in control group sufficient improvement only by familiarization of the task though clinically significant.

References