Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Khare, Satyam
- Usage of Multimedia Learning Modules for Teaching Human Microanatomy and its Assessment through OSCA/OSCE
Abstract Views :210 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
2 Deparment of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
3 Department of Community Medicine Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
2 Deparment of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
3 Department of Community Medicine Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 3, No 3 (2012), Pagination: 172-174Abstract
With the advent of the multimedia and inclusion of computer assisted instruction in an anatomy course has permitted the acquisition of the course objectives in a reduced amount of time. Keeping this in mind a study was done in department of Anatomy of Subharti Medical College to assess the students on their ability to understand microanatomy when taught on microscope in comparison to teaching on computers.
The performance was also evaluated on basis of OSCA/OSCE in comparison to diagram making which is a conventional method of assessment. Results obtained were statistically evaluated and it was found that on one hand teaching should include both conventional method of teaching i.e. through microscope as well as through computers while on the other hand OSCA is definitely a better means of evaluation.
Keywords
Multimedia Learning Modules, OSCA/OSCE
References
- Testut L. Traite d’ anatomie humaine, Paris Doin; 1896.
- Bannister LH, Berry MM, Williams PL, Gray’s Anatomy: The anatomical basis of Medicine & Surgery. 38th ed. New York: Churchill livingstone; 1995.
- Sobotta J. Atlas d’ anatomine humaine 21st ed. Munich: Urban & Fischer; 2000.
- Marks S.C information technology, medical education and anatomy for the 21st cenlury Clin Anat; 1996, 9: 343-8.
- Benbunan- Fich R Improving education and training with information technology Commun ACM 2000,45: 94-99.
- Smith TL, Ruocco A, Jansen BJ. Digital video in education Proceedings of the ACM Computer Science Education Conference, New Orleans, 1999,p 122-126.
- Lozanoff S, Lozanoff BK, Sora M-C, Rosenheimer J, Keep MF, Tregear J, Saland L, Jacobs J, Saiki S, Alverson D. Anatomy and the access grid: exploiting plastinated brain sections for use in distributed medical education Anat Rec (New Anat) 2003, 270B: 30-37.
- Mattingly G.E & Barnes C.E Teaching human anatomy in physical therapy education in the united States: A survey. Physical therapy , 1994,74, 720-727.
- Fitzharris T.P. survey of gross anatomy courses in the united states and Canada The Anatomical Record 1998, 253,162-166.
- Walsh R.J., & Bohn R.C. Computer assisted instruction : A role in teaching human gross anatomy. Medical education 1990,24, 499-506.
- Standford, W< Erkmonen W.E., Cassell B.D., Moran G, Easley R.L., Carries & Albanese M.A Evaluation of a computer based program for teaching cardiac anatomy. Investigative Radiology, 1994,29,248-252.
- Rolfe I Mc Pherson J. Formative assessment how am I doing ? Lancet 1995; 345: 837-839.
- Leeder SR, Feletti GI, Engel CE. Assessment – help or hurdle ? Programmed learning and educational Technology 1979:16:316-321.
- Engel CE, Feletti GI, Leeder SR. Assessment of medical students in a new curriculum. Assessment in higher education 1980;5: 279-293.
- Trivino X, Vasquez A, Mena A et al , Application of objective structured clinical examination OSCE for pediatric internship assessment in two schools of medicine, Rev Med Chil 2002 Jul; 130 7): 24
- Barman A, Critiques on the objective structured clinical examination, Anu Acod Med Singapore 2005 Sep; 34 (8): 478-82
- Schoonheim Klien ME et al, Implementing an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in dental education : effects on students learning strategics . Eur J Dent Educ 2006 Nov; 10 (4): 226-35.
- Facial Index in Adult Indian Punjabi Males Jat Sikhs and Banias
Abstract Views :420 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Mukesh Singla
1,
Prabhat Goel
2,
Rashmi Ghai
2,
Satyam Khare
2,
Shilpi Jain
2,
Patnaik V. V. Gopichand
3
Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College Delhi-Haridwar By Pass Road, Meerut (U.P.), IN
2 Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
3 Department of Anatomy M.M. Medical College, Mullana Ambala, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College Delhi-Haridwar By Pass Road, Meerut (U.P.), IN
2 Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
3 Department of Anatomy M.M. Medical College, Mullana Ambala, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 2, No 1 (2011), Pagination: 52-56Abstract
Introduction
Face is an entity that allow us to distinguish one person from another. It also permits distinctions between races, ethnic groups, sexes and even members of same family. Human face can be studied by means of natural science or more specifically by biological anthropology, which is scientific study of human biological characters. Many factors are responsible for the variation in the human's face viz hormonal, genetic heritage, sex environment and age. Aims and objectives This research was conducted in view of the importance of anthropometric indices of the face in plastic and cosmetic surgery, forensic medicine and other allied clinical sciences.
Material and methods
This cross-sectional study was set up to determine and compare the face shape in Jat Sikhs and Bania males of Indian Punjab origin (300 adult male Jat Sikhs and 300 adult male Banias). The total facial height&breadth of bizygomatic arch were measured and the facial index was calculated. Then these two endogamous groups were compared for these parameters.
Results
The dominant type of face shape in Jat Sikhs males was euryprosopic (39.94%) whereas hypereuryprosopic type of face was in dominance (44.51 %) in Bania males.
Conclusion
This study showed that ethnicity can affect the form of face in adult Indian Punjabi male Jat Sikhs and Banias.
Keywords
Facial Anthropometry, Facial Index, Adult Jat Sikh Males, Bania Males, PunjabReferences
- Ternio EO: Alloplastic facial contouring by zonal Principles of skeletal anatomy. Clinics in Plastic Surgery 1992 April; 19(2): 487-510.
- Farkas LG and Kolar JC: Anthropometric and art in the aesthetics of women’s faces. Clinics in plastic surgery 1987 October; 14(4): 599-616.
- Henneberg M, Stephan C and Simpson E: Human face in Biological anthropology: Craniometry, evolution and forensic identification. In: The Human Face: Measurement and meaning. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 2001:1-17
- Parwati R and Sawhney A: Midline nasal ergonomics of north Indian males. A baseline study. J Anat Soc India 1997; 46(2): 89-98.
- Marya RK and Maini BK: A short note on the anthropometric variation in members of two communities of Haryana. Indian Anthropologist 1985; 15(2): 181-183.
- Kumar GD, Bhowmik DC, Basu A: All India Anthropometric Survey, North Zone, Vol. 8: Punjab. Anthropological Survey of India, Calcutta; 1990: p 11 – 12.
- Singh IR and Bhasin MK: Introduction. In: A laboratory manual on biological Anthropology, 1st edition. Kamla-Raj Enterprises, Delhi 1968; 2-3.
- Mukerjee B and Kaul KK: Anthropometric observations on urban primary school children. Ind J Med Research 1970; 58: 1257-1271.
- Khandiya PC, Agarwal KN and Taneja PN: Growth study in first year of life on optimal nutritional conditions. Indian Ped Journal 1967; 4(5): 203-207.
- Sutton PRN: Bizygomatic diameter: The thickness of the soft tissue over the zygion. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 1969; 30:303-310.
- Pandey A K.Cephalo-facial variation among Onges.Anthropologist 2006; 8(4):245-249.
- Ghosh S, Malik SL. Sex differences in body size and shape among Santhals of West Bengal. Anthropol 2007; 9:143-9.
- Jahanshahi M, Golalipour MJ, Haidari K. The effect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran.Singapore Med. J. 2008;49(11):940-943.
- Golalipour MJ, Haidari K, Jahanshahi M, Farahani RM. The shapes of head and face in normal male newborns in South-Eastof Caspian Sea (Iran-Gorgan). J Anat Soc India 2003; 52:28-31.
- Golalipour MJ, Jahanshahi M, Haidari K. The variation of head and face shapes in female newborns in the South-East of the Caspian Sea (Iran-Gorgan). Eur J Anat 2005; 9:95.
- Ultrasonic Measurement of Foetal Biparietal Diameter and its Correlation to Gestational Age in the Garhwali Population
Abstract Views :224 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, NH 58 Delhi Haridwar Bypass Road, Meerut, IN
2 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, NH 58 Delhi Haridwar Bypass Road, Meerut, IN
2 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Meerut, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 2, No 1 (2011), Pagination: 74-77Abstract
Accurate knowledge of the maturity of the foetus influences management of antepartum care of a patient, planning of appropriate therapy or intervention, perinatal morbidity and mortality. Measurement of Biparietal diameter by ultrasound has proved to be a useful and accurate method for determining gestational age and maturity of the foetus. In the present study foetal Biparietal diameter was measured in 25 Garhwali women during normal pregnancy between 12-40 weeks of pregnancy and noted that the mean Biparietal diameter of cranium between 12-16 weeks of gestation was 29.74 ± 4.95 mm and it attained a maximum mean of 90.58 ± 2.68 at full term pregnancy (36-40 weeks). This study showed that the gestational age calculated from the regression equation for the Biparietal diameter correlates well with the actual gestational age, so biparietal diameter is a good parameter for assessing maturity of the foetus.Keywords
Biparietal Diameter, Gestational AgeReferences
- Donald I, Brown TG: Demonstration of tissue interfaces within the body of ultrasonic echo sounding: Br J Radiol 1961; 34:539.
- Campbell S. and Newman GB. Growth of the fetal biparietal diameter during normal pregnancy. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1971; 78:513-519.
- William PL, Dyson M, Dussek JE, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P et al. Skeletal system. In: Gray’s Anatomy, 38th edition. Edinburgh, London: ELBS; 1995. p. 607- 12.
- Varma TR. Prediction of delivery date by ultrasound cephalometry. The Journal of Obstertrics and Gynaecology of the British Commonwealth 1973; 80: 316-319.
- Sabbagha RE, Turner JH, Rockette H, Mazer J and Orgill J. Sonar BPD and fetal age. Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1974; 43 :7-13.
- Parker AJ, Davies P, Newton JR. Assessment of gestational age of Asian fetus by the sonar measurement of crown-rump length and biparietal diameter. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 1982; 89: 836- 838.
- Okupe RF, Cooker OO, Gbajumo SA. Assessment of foetal biparietal diameter during normal pregnancy by ultrasound in Nigerian women. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1984; 99: 629-632.
- Rajan R; Fetal biometry. Ultrasonic in obstetrics, gynaecology and infertility. 2nd ed. New Delhi: CBS publishers and Distributors; 1996. p. 181-94.
- Rajlakshmi C, Singh SM, Devi B and Singh CL. Cephalic Index of foetuses of Manipuri population –A Baseline study. Journal of The Anatomical Society of India 2001; 50: 8-10.
- Sabbagha RE, Barton FB and Barton BA. Sonar biparietal diameter. Analysis of percentile growth differences in two normal population using same methodology. American Journal of Obstetetrics and Gynaecology 1976;126:479-484.
- Dubowitz LMS and Goldberg C. Assessment of gestation by ultrasound in various stages of pregnancy in infants differing in size and ethnic origin. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1981; 88: 225- 259.
- Asthana AK, Singh AK, Kumar V et al. Assessment of gestational age by ultrasonographic measurement of biparietal diameter in utero. Journal of Anatomical Sciences 1995; 14(2): 1-5.
- Tuli A, Choudhary R, Agarwal S, Anand C and Garg H. Correlation between craniofacial dimension and fetal age. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India 1995;44: 1-12.
- Willock J, Donald I, Duggan TC and Day N. Obstet Gynaecol British Commonwealth 1964; 71:11.
- Thompson HE, Holmes JH, Gottesfeld KR and Taylor ES. American Journal of Obstetetrics and Gynaecology 1965;92:44.
- Campbell S. The prediction of foetel maturity by ultrasonic measurements of biparietel diameter. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, British commonwealth 1969; 76: 603-609
- Bowie JD and Andreotti RF. Estimating gestational age in utero. In: Callen P, editor. Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Philadelphia : WB Saunders Company; 1983. p. 21-39.
- Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Carpenter RJ and Park SK. Estimating fetal Age : Effect of head shape on BPD. American Journal of Radiology 1981; 137:83-85.
- Gupta K. Measurement of fetal parameters. In: Malhotra N, Kumar P, Gupta DS, Rajan R, editors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 3rd ed. Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Lordson Publishers; 2001. p. 92-8.
- Berger GS, Edelman DA and Kerenyl TD. Fetal crown rump length and biparietal diameter in the second trimester of pregnancy. American Journal of Obstet. Gynaecol 1975; 9-12.
- Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Hagberg H, Sultan B and Wennergren M. Gestational age in pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization: Comparison between ultrasound measurement and actual age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;170-174.