A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Manjunath, S
- A Study of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology as an Evaluation Tool in Head and Neck Masses
Authors
1 Dept. of Pathology, Navodaya Medical College and Research Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka
2 Dept. of ENT, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore
3 Greenview Hospital, Bangalore
4 Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 57-62Abstract
Background and objectives: Masses in head and neck region are a common clinical problem. The clinical evaluation of head and neck masses can be difficult because of anatomical peculiarities, proximity of tissues of various types and wide range of primary and metastatic neoplasm of these areas. The aim of pre-operative and pretreatment investigation is to arrive at a precise and whenever possible type specific diagnosis.
The conventional surgical histopathological examination is considered as confirmatory test. So arise the need for a technique which is less invasive and with less complication, so that treatment can be directed early.
Materials and method: A prospective study was done in department of Pathology from Feb 2008 to Aug 2010. The patients presenting to ENT OPD were subjected to FNAC, whenever possible, these patients were subjected to histopathological study by biopsy. Only those cases, which were subjected to, FNAC and Biopsy, were taken for the study. All cases were examined in detail regarding site, size, and consistency of swelling. Acute inflammatory conditions like neck abscesses and nasal masses like polyps were excluded from the study.
Results: Fifty cases were studied and data were analysed. 27 patients were females and 23 were males. Of the 50 cases 5 (10%) were seen in nasal cavity, 2 (4%) cases were seen in maxillary sinus, 12 (24%) cases were in oral cavity, 11 (22%) in salivary glands i.e. in parotid 6 (12%), 5 (10%) in Submandibular gland, 10 (20%) were in thyroid, 10 (20%) in neck i.e. including both lymph nodes and soft tissue swellings.
Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a rapid, cost effective and simple out patient procedure which can be performed safely. It has high accuracy rate for head and neck masses. FNAC is the first step of pathological examination in all head and neck masses. In primary diagnosis, accuracy varies with site of lesions, the tissue of origin and the nature of the process. Clinically FNAC should only be used as a guide for preliminary diagnosis, especially in malignant pathologies. Final treatment decision should not be made according to the results of FNAC and tissue biopsy should be obtained before definitive treatment.
Keywords
FNAC, Head and Neck, Biopsy
References
- Orell SR, Sterrett GF, Walters MN-I, Whitaker D (1999). Head and Neck; salivary Glands. In: Manual and Atlas of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology .3rd Edition, Churchill Livingstone, New York.
- Cramer H; Lampe H; Downing P (1995): Intraoral and transoral fine needle Aspiration .A review of 25 cases .Acta Cytol 39:683-688.
- Roussel F, Dalion J, Benozio M: The risk of tumoral seeding in needle biopsies.Acta cytol 33:936-939, 1989
- Fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosis of Head & neck Tumour –study of 1082 cases.Asitieiva Mandal, B.K. Choudary –Indian Journal of Otolaryngology & Head & Neck, pg 176.
- Meatheringham R.E., Ackerman L.U.; Aspiration Biopsy of Lymphnodes, A Critical review of results of 300 aspirations; Journal of surgery, Gynaecology And obstetrics: 1071-1076, 1947.
- Thomson J., Anderson J.C, Bangsho C. Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy of tumours of head and neck. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 1973; Vol871211-1216.
- Rode J: Fine needle cytology versus Histology. Histopathology 15:435-439, 1989.
- Koss L.G., Woyke S, Olszewski W: Aspiration biopsy; Cytologic interpretation And Histologic basis, lgaku-shoin, New York 1984.
- Sismanis A, Merriam J, Yamaguchi KT, Shapshay S.M, Strong M.S. Diagnostic value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in neoplasms of head & neck. Otolaryngology Head & Neck surgery 89 62-66 1981.
- Frable W.J., Frable M.A., Thin Needle Aspiration Biopsy –the diagnosis of Head and neck tumors revised; cancer 43: 1541-111548, 1979.
- Frable W.J.; Thin Needle Aspiration Biopsy-A personal experience with 469 Cases; American Journal of clinical pathology 65:168-182, 1966.
- Pontifex A.H., Roberts F.J. Fine needle aspiration cytology in inflammatory Condition .Acta cytologica1986; Vol29:979-982
- Ramzy .T, Rose R., Buhaug J., Schultenover S.J. LymphnodeAspiration Biopsy-Diagnostic reliability and limitations-An analysis of 350 Cases.Diagnostic cytopathology 1985; Vol1:39-45.
- Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration biopsy of cold nodules of Thyroid Becharam Sadhikhan, Baran Kumar, Roy Choudary –Indian Journal Of Otolaryngology & Head pg 63 June 1992.
- Boey J., R.J., Hau C., Wong J., A prospective controlled study of fine needle Aspiration and tru cut needle biopsy of dominant thyroid nodules; world Journal of surgery 8:458-465, 1984.
- Chu E.W., Hoyer G.; Study of cells in fine needle aspiration of thyroid gland; Acta cytological 23: 309-314, 1979.
- Mondal A., Barin Kumar Roy chaudhary, Shantanu Banerjee, Bechuram Sadhukham; Cytodiagnostic Accuracy of fine Needle Aspiration of cold Nodules of thyroid; Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and head and neck, Vol. No @: 63-65.1992.
- GErshengorn M.C., Chu E.W., Manson T.A.S., Melung M.R.; Robbins J., Weintraiub B.D., Fine needle Aspiration Cytology in pre operative diagnosis Of Thyroid nodules; Ann Int. med. 77, 87:265-269, 1977.
- FNAC versus Histopathology in cervical lymhadenopathy .M.Aslam, S.M.Hasan, S.A. Hasan .Vol 52 pg137.
- Kline T.S., Neal H.S.; Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy: Critical Appraisal, 8 Years and 3267 specimen later; Journal of American Medical Association 239:36-39, 1978.
- A Prospective Study of Role of FESS in Management of Recurrent Nasal Polyposis
Authors
1 Dept. of ENT, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, EPIP Bangalore, IN
2 Dept. of Pathology, Navodaya Medical College and Research Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka, IN
3 Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 4 (2013), Pagination: 257-261Abstract
Objectives: Nasal Polyps are the most frequent and very prevalent nasal masses, which the otorhinolaryngologists come across. The uncertain etiologies of this condition have contributed greatly to a wide range of treatment, none of which has been uniformly successful or universally accepted. Hence, this literature looks at the various causes of recurrence of nasal polyposis and also compares the efficacy of conventional and endoscopic endonasal polypectomy in terms of safety, recurrence and postoperative morbidity.
Materials and method: The present study was conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology in Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre from April 2009 to March 2011.
Data for this study was collected. All clinically confirmed cases of recurrent nasal polyposis Cases selected were subjected to a complete examination according to the defined proforma. Detailed history was taken and clinical examination done. Acute infections were treated on medical line and then taken up for surgery. All patients received a course of antibiotics starting one day prior to surgery. The patients were treated either by conventional polypectomy or Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).The patients were discharged when fit and were strictly called for follow-up on the first week, third week, 2nd month, 4th month, 6th month and 1 year from date of surgery.
Results: Fifty cases having nasal polyposis were selected and subjected to surgical management. The cases were divided into 2 groups. The first 25 cases were identified as Group-1 and were subjected to surgical management using conventional polypectomy. Similarly, the next 25 cases were identified as Group-2 and were subjected to surgical management using Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS).
The salient observations of this study are as follows:
1. Age: The age of the patients ranged from 6-65 years with a mean age of 31.5 years. In case of antrochoanal polyp, the average age was 20 years.
2. Sex: A male preponderance is seen with a male: female ratio of 2.57:1.
3. Complaints: Majority of the patients presented with complaints of nasal obstruction and nasal discharge, followed by headache, sneezing, anosmia and postnasal drip.
4. Diagnosis: Out of 50 cases, 31 patients presented with Ethmoidal polyp and 19 patients presented Antrochoanal polyp.
5. Complications: Bleeding (<50 ml), was the most common intraoperative and postoperative complication.
6. Recurrence: Recurrence was seen in 36% cases with conventional polypectomy and 12% cases with functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), which indicates low recurrence in case of patients who underwent FESS.
Conclusion: Nasal polyposis is a prevalent disease and is known for its recurrence. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a minimally invasive technique used to restore sinus ventilation and normal function. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery revolutionized the management of chronic inflammatory sinus diseases. In nasal polyposis, there is no doubt that the polypoidal mucosa needs to be completely removed to prevent recurrence. Endoscopic technique can help achieve this goal and also preserve the healthy mucosa and its physiological function of mucociliary mechanism. Also, patients usually experience only minimal discomfort. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery has better success rates than conventional polypectomy and is less traumatic to the patients. The complication rate for this procedure is lower than that for conventional sinus surgery.
Keywords
Nasal Polyps, Polypectomy, FESSReferences
- Martin E. Vancil. A historical survey of treatments for nasal polyposis. The Laryngoscope 1968; 435-445.
- Ramesh C. Deka. Antrochoanal polyps: Its pathogenesis, origin and management by FESS. Ind J Otology Head Neck Surg 1999; 51:33-35.
- Stammberger Heinz. FESS – The Messerklinger Technique. Mosby Yearbook 1991. Pg. xii.
- Wigand ME. Transnasal Ethmoidectomy under Endoscopic Control. Rhinology 1981; 19: 7-10
- Wigand ME, Steiner W, Jaumann MP. Endonasal sinus surgery with endoscopic control from radical operation to rehabilitation of the mucosa. Endoscopy 1978; 10: 255-260.
- Levine HL. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: Evaluation, Surgery and follow up of 250 patients. Laryngoscope 1990; 100: 79-84.
- Wynn and Has EL. Recurrence rates after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Laryngoscope 2004; 114: 118-120.
- Drake Lee AB. Nasal Polyps, Scott Brown’s Otolaryngology, Vol. 4, 6th edition, Butterworth- Heinemann 1997; Chapter 4/10/1-15.
- Duncavage JA. Nasal Polyposis. Current Therapy in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 1994; 6th edition, Mosby Inc. 366-369.
- Gindy AE, Mansour MH. The role of transcanine surgery in Antrochoanal Polyps. J Laryngol Otol 1994; 108: 1055-1057.
- Mayers D, Myers EN. The medical and surgical treatments of nasal polyps. Laryngoscope 1994; 84: 833-847.
- Stammberger H. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Ed Decker BC, Philadelphia 1991; 17-87 / 145-268.
- Jean Michel Klossek. Diffused nasal polyposis: Postoperative long-term results after endoscopic sinus surgery and frontal irrigation. Otolaryngology Head and neck surgery 1997; 117(4): 355-361.
- Neena Chowdhary, Rajeev Kapoor, Gul Motwani, Gandotra SC. FESS results in 69 patients. Ind J Otolaryngol and Head and Neck Surg 1999; 52(1): 5-8.
- Deka Ramesh. Antrochoanal polyp: Its pathogenesis, origin and management by FESS. Indian journal of otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery 1999; 51(1): 33-35.
- Freitas MR, Giesta RP, Pinheiro D, Sitva VC. Antrochoanal polyp review of 16 cases. Rev Bras Otrorhinolaryngology (Engl Ed) 2006; 72(6): 831-835.
- Yuca K, Bayran I., Kiroglu A.F, Etlik O, Cankaya H., Silcin F, Kiris M. Evaluation and treatment of antrochoanal polyp. J Otolaryngol 2006; 34 (6):420-3.
- Wang H, Zhang L, Zhou B, Zhang W, Liu HC, Liu M. Huang Q. Relationship between allergic factors and chronic sinusitis with or without nasal polyposis. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2005; 40 (3): 168-71.
- Jovicevic J, Kljajic V. Nasal polyposis and allergic rhinitis. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2005; 133 (supplement 2): 105-7.
- Hemanth Chopra AS, Khurana, Manish Munjal, Kapil Due. Indian journal of Otorhinolaryngology and head and neck surgery 2006; 58(2).
- Dalsiel K, Stein K, Round A, Garside R, Royke P. Systematic review of endoscopic Sinus surgery for nasal polyp. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7(17):1-159.
- Venkatachalam et al. Comparative evaluation of endoscopic and conventional Surgical techniques in the management of nasal polyposis. J K Practitioner 1998; 5(4): 295-299.
- Bussaba et al. Endoscopic sinus surgery for inflammatory maxillary sinus disease. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 1378-1383.
- Zhang et al. The clinical application of FESS and conventional technique in sinus Surgery. Zhongua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi 1998; 33(6): 354-355.