A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Suganthi, Pearline
- Direct Observation Pattern of DOTS (Directly Observed Treatment Short Course) by Alternate DOTS Providers for Patients Treated under RNTCP in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Authors
1 Department of Community Medicine, SMIMS, Kulasekharam, T.N., IN
2 Department of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, T.N., IN
3 Department of Community Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, T.N, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 3, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 131-134Abstract
Direct Observation of Treatment Short course (DOTS) is the proven effective in controlling TB on a mass basis around the world. Direct observation is the central and key element for the success of the DOTS strategy. In India, Multi-purpose health workers play a major role in treatment observation; where they are not available, treatment observation is done by community volunteers including anganwadi workers, traditional dais, and community and religious leaders. The choice of DOTS provider should be based on access, patient preference and availability of the DOTS providers. This study was done to find the pattern of the direct observation component of the DOTS strategy by the professional and community DOTS providers and to find out their acceptance among the patients.
Material and Method
164 new sputum positive patients treated at rural and urban TB clinics of CMC Vellore from January 2001 to December 2004 were followed up during November 2005 along with their respective DOTS providers using separate structured questionnaires. The data entry and statistical analysis was done using SPSS data analysis package version 12.0. Chi2 test and t- test were used to test the significance of the data.
Result
Intensive Phase (IP) treatment was given alternate days by 94.5% of the community providers compared to 90.1% of professional providers. In Continuation Phase (CP) treatment, it was not expected by the RNTCP guidelines to give alternate days. But 34.2% of community providers had given on alternate days as in IP compared to only 4.4% of professional providers. The difference is statistically significant (p value <0.001). Patients observed by professional providers had to travel the mean distance of 0.91 Km compared to only 0.31 km with community providers (p value <0.001). The average time spent each time to get drugs from their providers in the professional arm is 27.42 minutes compared to only 14.86 minutes with community providers (p value <0.001). In the professional arm the main place was clinics/hospitals (90.1%) and in the community arm mainly either it was patients' house (452%) or providers' house (41.1%). In the professional arm, the patients are cumulated in the working hours of the professional providers and they are evenly distributed regarding time in the community arm.
Conclusion
The DOTS being provided at home with less consumption of time and lesser distance to travel are significantly different in the community arm of DOTS providers as compared to the professional DOTS providers.
Keywords
DOTS Providers, Community Providers
References
- Dye C, Scheele S, Dolin P, Pathania V, Raviglione MC. Global burden of tuberculosis: estimated incidence, prevalence and mortality by country. J Am Med Assoc 1999; 282(7):677-86.
- TB India 2005. RNTCP Status Report, Central TB Division Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi–110011.
- Maher D, Mikulencak M. What is DOTS? A guide to understanding the WHO recommended TB control strategy known as DOTS. Geneva: WHO Communicable Diseases Prevention and Control, 1999 (WHO/CDS/CPC/TB/99.270).
- Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme Introduction; Central TB Division, Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi–110011.
- World Health Organization. Managing tuberculosis at the district level: a training course. Geneva, WHO, 1994 (document WHO/TB/96.211).
- Chowdhury AMR. Control of tuberculosis by community health workers in Bangladesh. Lancet 1997; 350:169 - 72.
- Wilkinson D, Davies GR, Connolly C. Directly observed therapy for tuberculosis in rural South Africa 1991 through 1994. American Journal of Public Health 1996; 86:1094-97.
- Tomans Tuberculosis, case detection, treatment and monitoring - second Edition, WHO, Geneva, 2004.
- Khatri GR. The Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme: A Status Report on first 1,00,000 patients. Ind J Tuberc 1999;46:157.
- Wright J, Walley J, Philip A, Pushpananthan S, Dlamini E, Newell J et al. Direct observation of treatment for tuberculosis: A randomized controlled trial of community health workers versus family members. Tropical Medicine and International Health 2004 May; 9(5) 559–65.
- Volmink J, Garner P. Directly observed therapy [letter]. Lancet 1997;349:1399-00.
- Sbarbaro J. What are the advantages of direct observation of treatment? In: Frieden T, editor. Toman’s tuberculosis: Case detection, treatment and monitoring – questions and answers. Second edition, Geneva: WHO, 2004:183-84.
- Shafer J, Falzon D, Small I, Kittle D, DOTS in Aral Sea area. Correspondence. Lancet 2001 Dec 8;358;2001
- Toman K. What are the keys to cure? In: Frieden T, editor. Toman’s tuberculosis: Case detection, treatment and monitoring – questions and answers. Second edition, Geneva: WHO, 2004:260-62.