A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Phadnaik, Mangesh
- Prevalence of Gingival Recession and its Associated Etiologic Factors: a Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
1 Department of Dentistry, Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) Adilabad. Govt. of A. P., IN
2 Dept. of Periodontology, Govt. Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur, M.S, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 119-123Abstract
Background: Gingival recession, sometimes called ischolar_main exposure, is a rather common clinical finding in adults. During recent years, a growing concern about an increase in gingival recession has been expressed by a number of dental clinicians all over the world. Studies on the incidence, prevalence, etiology and treatment of gingival recession have been published by various authors from different countries. However, representative information about the occurrence and risk factors of gingival recession in Indian population is limited.
Objective: To determine prevalence, extent, severity and associated etiological factors of gingival recession in a sample of dental patients.
Materials and Method: 511 subjects of either sex, aged 15 years and above were selected randomly and examined. Demographic data, dental complaints, deleterious oral habits, oral hygiene habits and detailed intraoral examination was done. Prevalence of gingival recession, its correlation to demographic data and etiological factors were examined.
Results: The prevalence of gingival recession in the present study was 89.04%.Prevalence increased with increasing age. Tooth powders, tobacco and ash as dentifrice, deleterious habits like smokeless tobacco, pan and/or betelnut chewing, frenum pull, poor oral hygiene and periodontitis contributed significantly in increasing the prevalence of gingival recession.
Conclusion: A high prevalence of gingival recession exists in dental patients in India. Etiology of gingival recession appears to be multifactorial.
Keywords
Gingival Recession, Prevalence, Etiological Factors
References
- Smith RG. Gingival recession: Reappraisal of an enigmatic condition and a new index for monitoring. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 201-05.
- Albandar JM, Kingman A. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding and dental calculus in adults 30 yrs of age and older in the United States 1988- 1994. J Periodontol 1999;70 (1): 30-43
- Loe H, Anerud A, Boysen H. The natural history of Periodontal disease in man: Prevalence, severity and extent of gingival recession. J Periodontol 1992; 63 (6) : 489-95.
- Vehkalahti M. Occurrence of gingival recession in adults. J Periodontol 1989; 60:599-603.
- Marini MG, Greghi SLA,Passanezi E, Passanezi San’t Ana AC. Gingival recession: Prevalence, Extension and severity in adults. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12(3)250-55.
- Ainamo J, Paloheimo L, Nordblad A, Mutomaa H. Gingival recession in school children at 7,12, and 17 yrs of age in Espoo, Finland. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986; 14:283-86.
- Bindu R, Cheru TR. Prevalence and etiology of gingival recession-An Epidemiological study. Ind Soc Periodontol Bulletin 1992;16(2):4-8.
- Susin C, Haas AN, Oppermann RV,Hangejorden O,Albandar JM. Gingival recession: Epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian Population. J Periodontol 2004; 75:1377-86.
- Kassab MM,Cohen RE.The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134(2):220-25
- Smukler H, Landsberg J. The tooth brush and gingival traumatic injury. J Periodontol 1984;55(12): 713-19
- Carlos MC, Muyco MM, Caliwag MC, Fajardo JA, Uy HG. The prevalence and distribution of gingival recession among UG dental students with a high standard of oral hygiene. J Philipp Dent Assoc 1995Dec-1996Feb;47(3):27-48
- Niemi ML, Sandholm L, Ainamo J. Frequency of gingival lesions after standardized brushing as related to stiffness of toothbrush and abrasiveness of dentifrice. J Clin Periodontol 1984; 11:254-61.
- Thomson WM, Hashim R,Pack ARC. The prevalence and intraoral distribution of periodontal attachment loss in a birth cohort of 26 year olds. J Periodontol 2000; 71:1840-45.