A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bommanahalli, Basavaraj P.
- Neoplastic Breast Lesions-a Histopathological Study with Special Emphasis on Histological Grading
Authors
1 Dept. of Pathology, Navodaya Medical College and Research Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka-584103, IN
2 Dept. of Pathology, Navodaya Medical College and Research Hospital, Raichur, Karnataka, IN
3 Dept. of Pathology, SSMC, Tumkur, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, Vol 4, No 1 (2013), Pagination: 58-62Abstract
Background and objectives: Breast neoplasms are the most common tumors affecting the women. This study was undertaken with an overall aim to explore the different aspects of breast tumors as one of the commonest neoplasia in women, particularly the histopathological features with special reference to histological grading.
Materials and methods: A prospective study was done in the department of Pathology, from June 2008 to May 2010. The specimens were collected from patients clinically diagnosed as having masses and histopathologically as tumors. All these lesions were classified according to World Health Organization classification.
Results: Hundred and ten cases were studied and data were analysed. All patients were females. Of the total 110 breast tumors, 62( 56.36% ) cases were benign, One( 00.90% ) ca-in situ, and 47 ( 42.72% ) were malignant. Fibroadenoma was the commonest among benign tumors. Of the malignant lesions studied 38 were infiltrating ductal carcinoma (80.85%), four (08.51%) were malignant phylloides, two (04.25%) were medullary carcinoma, two (04.25%) were lobular carcinoma and one (02.12%) was tubular carcinoma. Majority of malignant tumors were of grade I. ER/PR was positive in 16/22 cases. HER2/ neu was positive in 3/22 cases.
Conclusion: Morphological variants of invasive cancer have different biological outcomes. Distinguishing these heterogeneous forms of breast cancer along with grading is crucial for prognostic prediction. Therefore grading should be included as a component of minimum data set for histological reporting of breast cancer.
Keywords
Breast Neoplasms, Grading, Phyllodes Tumor
References
- Schmitt, SJ. The breast. In : Stenberg’s diagnostic surgical pathology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2004. 323-95.
- Pai MR, Pai KN, Rao RV, Naik R, Shankaranarayana, Baliga P. Connective tissue stromal changes in tumors and tumors like lesions of the breast. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1999; 42: 327-332.
- Khanna R, Khanna S, Chaturvedi S, Arya NC. Spectrum of breast disease in young females: A retrospective study of 1315 patients, Indian J Pathol Microbiol 1998; 41: 397-401.
- Hemalatha AL, Vidyakumari M & Rupashree S. Intra-operative imprint cytodiagnosis of breast lesions – A current perspective. Journal of Cytology. 2005; 22: 23-7.
- Bell DA, Hajdu SI, Urban JA, Gaston JP. Role of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of mammary lesions in office practice. Cancer 1983; 51: 1182-89.
- Giuliano AE. Breast. In: Way LW and Doherty GM eds. Current surgical diagnosis and treatment. 11th ed. Boston: Lange. 2003; 319-43.
- Russell RCG, Williams NS and Bulstrode CJK. The breast. In: Bailey and Love’s short practice of surgery. 24th ed. London: Arnold. 2004; 824-46.
- Kuijper A, Mommers EC, Vanderwall E, Van Diest PJ. Histopathology of fibroadenoma of the breast. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 115: 736-42.
- Pietruszka M, Barnes L. Cystosarcoma phyllodes: A clinicopathological analysis of 42 cases. Cancer. 1978; 41: 1974-83.
- Azzopardi JG. Problems in breast pathology. WB Saunders Company. 1979; 346-65.
- Rosai J, editor. Breast. In: Rosai and Ackerman’s surgical pathology. 9th ed, St.Louis: Mosby. 2004; 1763-1876.
- Lester SC, Kumar V, Abbas AK and Fausto N. The breast. In: Robbins and Cotron Pathologic basis of disease.7thEdition.Philadelphia, WB Saunder’s Company; 2004: 1119-1154.
- Ellis IO, Schnitt SJ, Garau XS, Bussolati G, Tavasolli FA and Eusebi V et al. Invasive breast carcinoma. In: World Health Organization classification of tumors, Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital organs. Lyon, IARC Press. 2002; 13-59.
- Macmohan B, Feinleib M. Breast cancer in relation to nursing and menopausal history. J Natl Cancer Inst 1960; 24: 733-53.
- Chary AY. Malignant breast lump. In: Clinical and operative surgery. 2nd ed. Hyderabad: Paras. 2002; 176-220.
- McDivit RW, Stewart FW, Berg JW. In: Atlas of tumor pathology, Second series, Fascicle 2. Tumors of the breast. Washington DC: AFIP, 1968.
- Pereira H, Pinder SE, Sibbering DM.Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. IV: Should you be a typer or a grader? A comparative study of two histological prognostic features in operable breast carcinoma. Histopathology.1995; 27: 219-26.
- Dalton LW, Page DL, Dupont WD. Histologic grading of breast carcinoma. A reproducibility study. Cancer 1994; 73: 2765-70.
- Frierson HF Jr, Wolber RA, Berean KW, Franquemont DW, Gaffey MJ, Boyd JC, Wilbur DC. Interobserver reproducibility of the Nottingham modification of the Bloom and Richardson histologic grading scheme for infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 1995; 103: 195-98.
- Robbins P, Pinder S, de Klerk N, Dawkins H, Harvey J, Sterett G, Ellis I, Elston C. Histological grading of breast carcinomas. A study of interobseryer agreement. Hum Pathol 1995; 26: 873-79.
- Elston CW, Ellis IO. Systemic pathology. 3Ed. In: The Breast. CW Elston and IO Ellis Eds. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.1998.
- Henson DE, Ries L, Freedman LS, Carriage M. Relationship among outcome, stage of disease, and histologic grade for 22,616 cases of breast cancer. The basis foe a prognostic index. Cancer.1991; 68: 2142-9.
- Elston CW & Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991; 19: 403-10.