International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Firm Performance of Companies in India


Affiliations
1 UBS, Panjab University, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The core idea of sustainability is that current decisions should not impair the prospects for maintaining or improving future living standards (Repetto, 1986). GRI (2006) defined sustainability as "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs". The challenges of sustainable development are many and it is widely accepted that organisations have not only a responsibility but also a great ability to exert positive change on the state of the world's economy, and environmental and social conditions. Further, the issue of environmental sustainability is intertwined with that of poverty and inequity. The causative relationship runs both ways- increased poverty and loss of rural livelihoods accelerates environmental degradation as displaced people put greater pressure on forests, fisheries, and marginal lands. The present study has made an attempt to investigate the relationship between sustainability reporting and financial performance of companies in India. Data have been collected with the help of annual reports of selected companies and Prowess Database. Collected data have been analysed with the help of SPSS 16.0. The study shows that sustainability reporting practices of companies has improved over the time. Further, research reveals that sustainability reporting practices of a firm impact its performance negatively in short run while positively in long run.

Keywords

Sustainable Development, Sustainability Reporting, Firm Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfi eld, J. D. (1985). An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profi tability. Academy of Management, 28(2), 446-463.

  • Babalola. & Abiodun, Y. (2012). The impact of corporate social responsibility on fi rms’ profi tability in Nigeria. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 45(1), 39-50.

  • Campbell, D. (2004). A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure in UK companiesa research note. The British Accounting Review, 36(1), 107-117.

  • Chang, D. S., Kuo, L. C. R., & Chen, Y. T. (2011). Industrial changes in corporate sustainability performancean empirical overview using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1-9.

  • Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P. A., & Ameer, P. (1996). Does improving a fi rm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price?. Journal of Investing, 6(4), 87-97.

  • GRI (2002a). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiative, Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org/guidelines/2002/gri_2002_guidelines.pdf on March 25, 2011.

  • GRI (2002b). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Global Reporting Initiative, Retrieved from www.globalreporting. org/guidelines/2002/gri_2002_guidelines.pdf on Jan 9, 2011.

  • GRI (2006). Sustainability Reporting Guidelines Version 3.0 (G3), Global Reporting Initiative, Amsterdam, Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org/index.asp on Jan 10, 2011.

  • GRI (2009). GRI reports list, Global Reporting Initiative, Retrieved from www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/ E033E311-68E7-41F9-A97F-9F3B94F3FE40/38 08/19992009reportslist_6jan6.xls on Jan 10, 2011.

  • Griffi n, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate fi nancial performance debate: Twenty- fi ve years of incomparable research. Business Society, 36(1), 5-31.

  • Grinyer, P. H., Yasai-Ardekani, M., & Al-Bazzaz, S. (1980). Strategy, structure, the environment, and fi nancial performance in 48 United Kingdom. Academy of Management, 23(2), 193-220.

  • Isa, M. A. (2014). Sustainability reporting among Nigeria food and beverages fi rms. International Journal of Agriculture and Economic Development, 2(1), 1-9.

  • Lin, C. H., Yang, H. L., & Liou, D. Y. (2009). The impact of corporate social responsibility on fi nancial performance: Evidence from business in Taiwan. Technology in Society, 31, 56-63.

  • Lopez, M. V., Garcia, A., & Rodriguez, L. (2007). “Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 285-300.

  • Lozano, R. (2011). The state of sustainability reporting in universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 67-78.

  • Makni, R., Francoeur, C., & Bellavance, F. (2009). Causality between corporate social performance and fi nancial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 409-422.

  • Michael, B., & Gross, R. (2004). Running business like a government in the new economy lessons for organizational design and corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 32-46.

  • Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D., & Gray, R. (2006). Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(2), 228-255.

  • Repetto, R. (1986). World enough and time. New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Saxena, M., & Kohli, A. S. (2012). Impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate sustainability: A study of the Indian banking industry. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 11(4), 39-54.

  • Siew, R. Y. J., Balatbat, M. C. A., & Carmichael, D. G. (2013). The relationship between sustainability practices and financial performance of construction companies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 2(1), 6-27.

  • Sun, L. (2012). Further evidence on the association between corporate social responsibility and fi nancial performance. International Journal of Law and Management, 54(6), 472-484.

  • Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (2000-06). Global Reporting Initiative Version 3, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/ ED9E9B36-AB54-4DE1-BFF2-5F735235CA44/0/G3_GuidelinesENU.pdf

  • Vijfvinkel, S., Bouman, N., & Hessels, J. (2011). Environmental sustainability and fi nancial performance of SMEs. EIM Research Reports, 1-47. Retrieved from http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/H201101.pdf.

  • Wagner, M. (2005). How to reconcile environmental and economic performance to improve corporate sustainability: Corporate environmental strategies in the European paper industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 76, 105-118.

  • Wagner, M., & Schaltegger, S. (2004). The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing. European Management Journal, 22(5), 557-572.

  • WBCSD. (2003). Sustainable development reporting: striking the balance. Geneva, Switzerland: The world business council for sustainable development.

  • Yang, F. J., Lin, C. W., & Chang, Y. N. (2010). The linkage between corporate social performance and corporate financial performance. African Journal of Business Management, 4(4), 406-413.

  • http://greeneconomypost.com/sustainability-and-profi trelationshipremains-uncertain-8139.htm

  • http://www.sustainabledevelopment.in/services/corporate_ substainability_management/activities/sustainability_ reporting.htm


Abstract Views: 339

PDF Views: 0




  • Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Firm Performance of Companies in India

Abstract Views: 339  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Priyanka Garg
UBS, Panjab University, Punjab, India

Abstract


The core idea of sustainability is that current decisions should not impair the prospects for maintaining or improving future living standards (Repetto, 1986). GRI (2006) defined sustainability as "meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their needs". The challenges of sustainable development are many and it is widely accepted that organisations have not only a responsibility but also a great ability to exert positive change on the state of the world's economy, and environmental and social conditions. Further, the issue of environmental sustainability is intertwined with that of poverty and inequity. The causative relationship runs both ways- increased poverty and loss of rural livelihoods accelerates environmental degradation as displaced people put greater pressure on forests, fisheries, and marginal lands. The present study has made an attempt to investigate the relationship between sustainability reporting and financial performance of companies in India. Data have been collected with the help of annual reports of selected companies and Prowess Database. Collected data have been analysed with the help of SPSS 16.0. The study shows that sustainability reporting practices of companies has improved over the time. Further, research reveals that sustainability reporting practices of a firm impact its performance negatively in short run while positively in long run.

Keywords


Sustainable Development, Sustainability Reporting, Firm Performance.

References