Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bathini, Dharma Raju
- Work from Home:A Boon or a Bane? The Missing Piece of Employee Cost
Abstract Views :172 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
2 Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, IN
1 Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
2 Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 50, No 4 (2015), Pagination: 568-574Abstract
This paper examines the discourse on work from home in global and indian contexts. it shows a long-held excessive focus on employee benefits which deflected the attention away from employee costs. Even though there was discussion on costs in th recent past, it mainly focussed on employers' costs. However, a growing body of recent research shows that the framing of work from home as an employee benefit creates normative pressures on employees to intensify their work. the authors argue that current discourse, which portrays work from home as an employer cost and simultaneously an employee benefit, can steepen the normative pressures on employees, creating undesirable outcomes.- McDonaldization of Work in Indian Fast-food Industry
Abstract Views :220 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 HRM Group, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
1 HRM Group, Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 52, No 3 (2017), Pagination: 386--399Abstract
This study explores the nature of fast-food work in the Indian context using a qualitative case study approach. The production and service systems at an Indian fast-food chain outlet and employees' experiences of these systems are analyzed. Standardization and rout inization is not strictly enforced compared to multinational chains like Domino's or McDonald's. Workers from rural background with little education oppose these practices as they find it difficult to adapt them. Poor pay, hectic workload and limited potential for growth become acceptable to young and vulnerable workers due to lack of alternate job opportunities.- Integrating P-E Fit & Demand Induced Strain Compensation Models of Work Stress
Abstract Views :246 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
1 Indian Institute of Management, Calcutta, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 53, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 462-474Abstract
Work stress has dire consequences both for the employee and the organization. “Person-environment” (P-E) fit models capture the specific effects of the transaction between the individual and the environment. On the contrary, match models of stress are universal in nature, and describe the relationship between various job characteristics. “Demand induced strain compensation” (DISC) is one such match model, which describes a triple match between job demands, job resources and strain. This paper, reviews both P-E fit and DISC models, and then integrates both the models to develop a comprehensive work stress model.References
- Benishek, L. A. & Lopez, F. G. (1997), “Critical Evaluation of Hardiness Theory: Gender Differences, Perception of Life Events, and Neuroticism”, Work & Stress, 11(1): 21-26
- Caplan, R. (1987), “Person-environment Fit Theory and Organizations: Commensurate Dimensions, Time Perspectives and Mechanisms”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3): 248-67. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X
- Carston, M. & Gardner, D. (2009), “Cognitive in the New Zealand Military’, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 38(3): 26-34.
- Cooper, C. L., Dewe, P. J., Michael, P. O. (2001), Organizational Stress: A Review of Theory, Research, and Application (2nd ed.), California, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Daniels, K. & de Jonge, J. (2010), “Match Making and Match Breaking: The Nature of Match within and Around Job Design”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1): 1-16. Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1348/096317909X485144
- de Jonge, J. & Dormann, C. (2006), “Stressors, Resources, and Strain at Work: a Longitudinal Test of the Triple-match Principle”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6): 1359-74.doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1359.
- Edwards, J. R. (1996), “An Examination of Competing Versions of the Person-environment Fit Approach to Stress”, Academy of Management Journal, 39(2): 292-339. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/256782
- Edwards, J. R. (2008), “Person–Environment Fit in Organizations: An Assessment of Theoretical Progress”, The Academy of Management Annals, 2(1): 167-230. doi:10.1080/19416520802211503
- Edwards, J. R. & Cooper, C. L. (1990), “The Person-environment Fit Approach to Stress: Recurring Problems and some Suggested Solutions”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(4): 293-307. doi:10.1002/job.4030110405
- Edwards, J. R. & Harrison, R. V. (1993), “Job Demands and Worker Health: Three-dimensional Reexamination of the Relationship between Person-environment Fit and Strain”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4): 628-48. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8407706
- Eschleman, K., Bowling, N. & Alarcon, G. (2010), “A Meta-analytic Examination of Hardiness”, International Journal of Stress Management, 17(4): 277-307.
- Furnham, A. & Schaeffer, R. (1984), “Person-environment Fit, Job Satisfaction and Mental Health”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(1): 295-307.
- Furnham, A.& Walsh, J. (1991), “Consequences of Person - environment Incongruence: Absenteeism, Frustration and Stress”, Journal of Social Psychology, 131(2): 187-204.
- Frese, M. (1999), “Social Support as a Moderator of the Relationship between Work Stressors and Psychological Dysfunctioning: A Longitudinal Study with Objective Measures”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 4(3): 179-92. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.4.3.179
- Johnson, J. V. & Hall, E. M. (1988), “Job Strain, Work Place Social Support and Cardiovascular Disease: A Cross-sectional Study of a Random Sample of the Swedish Working Population”, American Journal of Public Health, 78(10): 1336-42.
- Karasek Jr, R. A. (1979), “Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign”, Administrative Science Quarterly: 285-308.
- Maddi, S. & Hightower, M. (1999), “Hardiness and Optimism as Expressed in Coping Patterns”, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 51(2): 95-105.
- Quick, J. C., Nelson, D. L., Quick, J. D. & Orman, D. K. (2001), “An Isomorphic Theory of Stress: the Dynamics of Person-environment Fit”, Stress and Health, 17(3): 147-57. doi:10.1002/smi.893
- Revicki, D. & Gershon, R. (1996), “Work-related Stress and Psychological Distress in Emergency Medical Technicians”, Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1(4): 391-96.
- Searle, B. & Bright, J. (2003), “Bus Driving: A Bad Job for All or A Good Job for Some?” Australian Journal of Psychology, 55:143.
- Soderstrom, M., Dolbier, C., Leiferman, J. & Steinhardt, M. (2000), “The Relationship of Hardiness, Coping Strategies and Perceived Stress to Symptoms of Illness”, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(3): 311-28.
- Tansey, T. N., Mizelle, N., Ferrin, J. M., Tschopp, M. K. & Frain, M. (2004), “Work-related Stress and the Demand-ControlSupport Framework- Implications for the P X E Fit Model”, Journal of Rehabilitation, 70(3): 34-41.
- Vollrath, M. (2001), “Personality and Stress”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42(4): 335–47, Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9450.00245/abstract
- Wallace, K., Bisconti, T. & Bergeman, C. (2001), “The Mediational Effect of Hardiness on Social Support and Optimal Outcomes in Later Life”, Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 23(4): 267-79.
- Westman, M. (1990), “The Relationship between Stress and Performance: The Moderating Effect of Hardiness”, Human Performance, 3(3): 141.
- Yu, K. Y. T. (2009), “Affective Influences in Personenvironment Fit Theory: Exploring the Role of Affect as Both Cause and Outcome of P-E Fit”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5): 1210-26. doi:10.1037/a0016403