Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Four Poorly Known Deep-Sea Demersal Finfishes From Indian Eez


Affiliations
1 Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamilnadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu – 628 008, India
2 Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology (CMLRE), Govt of India, Kochi, Kerala – 682 508, India
3 Department of Aquaculture, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Cochin, Kerala – 682 013, India
 

Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs) and condition factor (K) were estimated for four deep-sea fish species belonging to four families from the Southeastern Arabian Sea and Western Bay of Bengal of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The specimens of Lamprogrammus brunswigi (Ophidiidae), Alepocephalus blanfordii (Alepocephaliformes), Parascombrops pellucidus (Synagropidae) and Pterigotrigla hemisticta (Triglidae) were collected using a high-speed demersal trawl II (HSDT II, crustacean version) and an EXPO-model trawl onboard FORV Sagar Sampada during March 2020. The b values ranged from 2.97 to 3.34 and the coefficient of variation (r2) ranged from 0.92 to 0.95. P. hemisticta showed negative allometric growth, and the remaining three species showed positive allometric growth. The condition factor was found to be high for P. hemisticta (1.108) compared to P. pellucidus (0.453), A. blanfordii (0.257), and L. brunswigi (0.082).

Keywords

Condition factor, Deep-sea fishes, Indian EEZ, Length-weight relationship
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Khan F M, Zacharia P U, Nandakumaran K, Mohan S, Arputharaj M R, et al., Catch, abundance and some aspects of biology of deep‐sea fish in the south eastern Arabian Sea, In: Proceedings of second workshop on scientific results of FORV Sagar Sampada, edited by V K Pillai, S A H Abidi, V Ravindran, K K Balachandran & V V Agadi, (New Delhi, India), 1996, pp. 564.

  • Hashim M, Distribution, diversity and biology of deep‐sea fishes in the Indian EEZ, Ph.D. thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India, 2012.

  • Kumar K V A, Thomy R, Deepa K P, Hashim M & Sudhakar M, Length–weight relationship of six deep‐sea fish species from the shelf regions of western Bay of Bengal and Andaman waters, J Appl Ichthyol, 32 (6) (2016) 1334-1336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13164

  • Froese R, Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta‐analysis and recommendations, J Appl Ichthyol, 22 (4) (2006) 241-253. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1439-0426.2006.00805.x

  • Froese R, Thorson J T & Reyes Jr R B, A Bayesian approach for estimating length‐weight relationships in fishes, J Appl Ichthyol, 30 (1) (2014) 78-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jai.12299

  • Kumar K V A, Thomy R, Hashim M & Sudhakar M, Length-weight relationships of 11 deep‐sea fishes from the western Bay of Bengal and Andaman waters, India, J Appl Ichthyol, 34 (4) (2018) 1048-1051. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13695

  • Drazen J C & Sutton T T, Dining in the deep: the feeding ecology of deep-sea fishes, Ann Rev Mar Sci, 9 (2017) 337-366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-010816-060543

  • Rajeeshkumar M, Aneesh Kumar K V, Hashim M, Saravanane N, Sanjeevan V N, et al., Length‐weight relationships of five deep‐sea anglerfishes from Andaman and Nicobar waters, J Appl Ichthyol, 34 (5) (2018) 1247-1250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.13773

  • Venu S, The systematics, distribution and bionomics of deep sea fishes beyond depth 200 m along the south west coast of India. Kerala, India, Ph.D. thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India, 2009.

  • Garcia C B, Duarte J O, Sandoval N, Von Schiller D, Melo G, et al., Length-weight relationships of demersal fishes from the Gulf of Salamanca, Colombia, Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 21 (1998) 30–32.

  • Pauly D, Fishbyte section, Editorial, Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 16 (1993) 1–26.

  • Petrakis G & Stergiou K I, Weight-length relationships for 33 fish species in Greek waters, Fish Res, 21 (3–4) (1995) 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7836(94)00294-7

  • Sileesh M, Madhusoodana Kurup B & Korath A, Length‐weight relationship of deep‐sea demersal finfishes from the Southeastern Arabian Sea, J Appl Ichthyol, 36 (6) (2020) 855-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/jai.14088

  • Jacob V, Biodiversity and Ecology of deep-sea megafauna within the 1500 m depth zone of Terrace off Trivandrum, Ph.D. thesis, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India, 2017.

  • Alcock A W, Natural history notes from H.M. Indian marine survey ship ―Investigator‖, Series II, No 25, A note on the deep-sea fishes, with descriptions of some new genera and species, including another probably viviparous ophidioid, Ann Mag Nat Hist, 2 (8) (1898) 136–156.

  • Alcock A W, A descriptive catalogue on the Indian deep‐sea fishes in the Indian Museum: Being a revised account of the deep‐sea fishes collected by the Royal Indian marine survey ship Investigator III, (Calcutta, India), 1899, pp. 211.

  • Fischer W & Bianchi G, FAO species identification sheets for fishery purposes. Western Indian Ocean (Fishing Area 51), Vol 1–6, (FAO Rome), 1984, pp. var. http:// www.fao.org/3/ad468e/ad468e00.html

  • Smith M M & Heemstra P C (Eds.), Smiths' Sea Fishes, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo), 1999, pp. 1047.

  • Froese R, Tsikliras A C & Stergiou K I, Editorial note on weight-length relations of fishes, Acta Ichthyol Piscat, 41 (4) (2011) 261-263. https://doi.org/10.3750/AIP2011.41.4.01

  • Treer T & Babacic H, The relationship between condition and form factors of the Adriatic fishes in the Zadar area, Croat J Fish, 75 (4) (2017) 153-155.

  • Hile R, Morphometry of the cisco, Leucichthys artedi (Le Sueur), in the lakes of the Northeastern Highlands, Wisconsin, Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 36 (1) (1938) 57-130.

  • Sreedhar U, Sudhakar G V S & Meenakumari B, Length-weight relationship of deep‐sea demersal fishes from the Indian EEZ, Indian J Fish, 60 (2013) 123–125.

  • Thomas J, Venu S & Kurup B M, Length‐weight relationship of some deep‐sea fish inhabiting the continental slope beyond 250m depth along the West Coast of India, Naga, The ICLARM Quarterly, 26 (2003) 17–21.

  • M'hetli M, Ben Khemis I, Hamza N, Turki B & Turki O, Allometric growth and reproductive biology traits of pikeperch Sander lucioperca at the southern edge of its range, J Fish Biol, 78 (2) (2011) 567-579. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02878.x

  • Mahadevan G, Gosavi S M & Murugesan P, Length-weight relationships and condition factor of five marine finfish species from Parangipettai (Tamil Nadu) and Mumbai (Maharashtra) coast of India, Thalassas, 36 (2) (2020) 375-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41208-020-00222-y

  • Meshram M M, Mridula R, Rajesh K M & Suyani N K, Morphological measurements, length weight relationship and relative condition factor (Kn) of Obtuse barracuda Sphyraena obtusata (Cuvier, 1829) from South-eastern Arabian Sea, Indian J Geo-Mar Sci, 50 (06) (2021) 480–488. http://nopr. niscpr.res.in/handle/123456789/57710

  • Deepu A V, Haridas D V & Kurup B M, Catch and biology of Alepocephalus bicolor (Alcock, 1891) from the southwest coast of India, J Mar Biol Assoc India, 49 (2) (2007) 239-242.

  • Olurin K B & Aderibigbe O A, Length-weight relationship and condition factor of pond reared Oreochromis niloticus, World J Zool, 1 (2) (2006) 82-85.

  • Jayaprakash A A, Kurup B M, Sreedhar U, Venu S, Thankappan D, et al., Distribution, diversity, length-weight relationship and recruitment pattern of deep-sea finfishes and shellfishes in the shelf-break area off southwest Indian EEZ, J Mar Biol Assoc India, 48 (1) (2006) 56-67.

  • Bineesh K, Nashad M, Kumar K V A, Akhilesh K V & Hashim M, Length-weight relationships of eight deep‐sea fish species collected from the southwest coast of India, J Appl Ichthyol, 34 (5) (2018) 1220-1222. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/jai.13745

  • Wang L, Wu Z, Liu M, Liu W, Zhao W, et al., Length-weight, length-length relationships, and condition factors of black rockfish Sebastes schlegelii Hilgendorf, 1880 in Lidao Bay, China, Thalassas, 33 (1) (2017) 57-63. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s41208-017-0021-6

  • Oni S K, Olayemi J Y & Adegboye J D, Comparative physiology of three ecologically distinct freshwater fishes, Alestes nurse Ruppell, Synodontis schall Broch & Schneider and Tilapia zillii Gervais, J Fish Biol, 22 (1) (1983) 105-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb04730.x

  • Jisr N, Younes G, Sukhn C & El-Dakdouki M H, Length-weight relationships and relative condition factor of fish inhabiting the marine area of the Eastern Mediterranean city, Tripoli-Lebanon, Egypt J Aquat Res, 44 (4) (2018) 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejar.2018.11.004

  • Anene A, Condition factor of four Cichlid species of a man-made lake in Imo State, Southeastern Nigeria, Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci, 5 (1) (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ejar.2018.11.004

  • Aura C M, Munga C N, Kimani E, Manyala J O & Musa S, Length–weight relationships for nine deep sea fish species off the Kenyan coast, Pan-Am J Aquat Sci, 6 (2011) 188–192.

  • Gayanilo F C Jr & Pauly D, FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools (FiSAT) reference manual, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1997.

  • Rex M A, Deep-sea species diversity: decreased gastropod diversity at abyssal depths, Science, 181 (4104) (1973) 1051-1053. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.181.4104.1051

  • Nandikeswari R, Sambasivam M & Mohan P M, Comparative study on condition factors of Terapon jarbua and Terapon puta from Puducherry waters, Indian J Geo-Mar Sci,

  • (2) (2017) 245- 249. 39 Mamaev Y L & Tkachuk L P, A new genus and species of monogenetic trematodes of the family Plectanocotylidae, Biol Morya Vladivost, 6 (1979) 72-75.

  • Masoomizadeh S Z, Pazooki J & Valinassab T, Changes in lengthweight relationship and condition factor of Talang queenfish (Scomberoides commersonnianus) in the north-west Persian Gulf, Iran J Fish Sci, 17 (1) (2018) 118-136.

  • Barnham C P S M & Baxter A, Condition factor, K, for salmonid fish, In: Fisheries notes, (State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries), 2003, ISSN 1440-2254.

  • King M, Fisheries biology, assessment and management, (Fishing News Books, London, UK), 1995, pp. 314.


Abstract Views: 39

PDF Views: 22




  • Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Four Poorly Known Deep-Sea Demersal Finfishes From Indian Eez

Abstract Views: 39  |  PDF Views: 22

Authors

K. Bheemeswararao
Department of Fisheries Biology and Resource Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamilnadu Dr. J. Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu – 628 008, India
D. Nihal
Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology (CMLRE), Govt of India, Kochi, Kerala – 682 508, India
K. V. Aneesh Kumar
Department of Aquaculture, Sacred Heart College (Autonomous), Cochin, Kerala – 682 013, India
R. Rajeev
Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology (CMLRE), Govt of India, Kochi, Kerala – 682 508, India
H. Manjebrayakath
Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology (CMLRE), Govt of India, Kochi, Kerala – 682 508, India

Abstract


Length-Weight Relationships (LWRs) and condition factor (K) were estimated for four deep-sea fish species belonging to four families from the Southeastern Arabian Sea and Western Bay of Bengal of the Indian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). The specimens of Lamprogrammus brunswigi (Ophidiidae), Alepocephalus blanfordii (Alepocephaliformes), Parascombrops pellucidus (Synagropidae) and Pterigotrigla hemisticta (Triglidae) were collected using a high-speed demersal trawl II (HSDT II, crustacean version) and an EXPO-model trawl onboard FORV Sagar Sampada during March 2020. The b values ranged from 2.97 to 3.34 and the coefficient of variation (r2) ranged from 0.92 to 0.95. P. hemisticta showed negative allometric growth, and the remaining three species showed positive allometric growth. The condition factor was found to be high for P. hemisticta (1.108) compared to P. pellucidus (0.453), A. blanfordii (0.257), and L. brunswigi (0.082).

Keywords


Condition factor, Deep-sea fishes, Indian EEZ, Length-weight relationship

References