Indian Journal of Fibre & Textile Research

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Modelling and Prediction of Visual-Haptic Perception in Textiles


Affiliations
1 Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502 285, India
2 Department of Textile Technology, University College of Technology, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India
 

The study examines the contact and non-contact assessment of textile modalities under three task conditions, namely visual, haptic, and visual-haptic combination. A comparative analysis shows that the cues perceived by flattened fabrics are insufficient to stimulate the perception of softness during the purely visual condition. At the same time, the spatial deformation caused by the action significantly stimulates the perception of softness in the purely haptic state. While in the visual-haptic dual condition, the spatial deformation causes a folding formation that stimulates the perception of softness by matching the visual and haptic cue information. The study outcomes are theoretically defined as Perceptual Conflict of Interest (PCI), which further focuses on the PCI model of fabric perceptual prediction. Accordingly, this study also discusses different concepts of sensory cue tracking and their impact on cloth modality assessment.

Keywords

Fabric hand feel, Fabric softness, Perceptual control theory, Subjective evaluation, Textile e-commerce, Visualhaptic dual conditions
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Rakhin K V & Prasad S Onkar, Proceedings, Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering, (2018) 647.

  • Peirce F T, J Text Inst, 21 (1930) T377.

  • Klatzky R L & Wu B, Multisensory Softness (Springer), 2014, 17.

  • Klatzky R L, Pawluk D & Peer A, Proc., The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 101 (9) (2013) 2081.

  • Elder H M, Fisher S, Armstrong K & Hutchison G, J Text Inst, 75 (1984) 99.

  • Di Gian francesco A, Materials for Ultra-Supercritical and Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Power Plants (Woodhead Publishing), 2017, 236.

  • Lederman S J & Klatzky R L, Atten Percept Psychophys, 71 (7) (2009) 1439.

  • Bishop D P, Text Prog, 26 (3) (1996) 1.

  • Elder H M, Fisher S, Hutchison G & Beattie S, J Text Inst, 76, (6) (1985) 442.

  • Elder H M, Fisher S, Armstrong K & Hutchison G, J Text Inst, 75 (1) (1984) 37.

  • Tian Yuan, Yi Sun, Zhaoqun Du, Dongming Zheng, Haochen Zou, Zhenrui Liu, Gui Liu & Xingxing Pan, Text Res J, 91 (11-12) (2021)1227.

  • Zheng Dongming, Liu Z, Zou H, Xiong Q, Liu J, Wang M, Liu G, Pan X & Du Z, Text Res J, 91 (7-8) (2021) 743.

  • Laughlin J, Int J Cloth Sci, 3 (1) (1991) 28.

  • Tadesse, Getnet M, Harpa R, Chen Y, Wang L, Nierstrasz V & Loghin C, J Ind Text, 48 (8) (2019) 1310.

  • AATCC Evaluation Procedure 5: 2006 (American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists, USA), 2010.

  • Shi Z, Hirche S, Schneider W X & Muller H, Proceedings, Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Tele Operator Systems (IEEE), 2008, 65.

  • Vanden Bos G R, APA Dictionary of Psychology (American Psychological Association), 2007, 776.

  • Schiffman H R, Sensation and Perception: An Integrated Approach (John Wiley & Sons), 1996, 6.

  • Landy M S, Banks M S & Knill D C, Sensory Cue Integration (OUP), 2011, 5.

  • Mansell W, The Interdisciplinary Handbook of Perceptual Control Theory: Living Control Systems IV (Academic Press), 2020, 9.

  • Powers W T, Abbott B, Carey T A, Goldstein D M, Mansell W, Marken R S & Taylor M, Perceptual Control Theory: An Overview of the Third Grand Theory in Psychology-Introductions, Readings, and Resources (Living Control Systems Publishing), 2016, 30.

  • Baddeley A D & Hitch G, Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Academic Press), 1974, 47-89.

  • Cohen J D, Perlstein W M, Braver T S, Nystrom L E, Noll D C, Jonides J & Smith E E, Nature, 386 (6625) (1997) 604.

  • Koster-Hale J & Saxe R, Neuron, 79 5 (2013) 836

  • Baddeley A D & Andrade J, J Exp Psychol: General, 129 (1) (2000) 126.

  • D’Angiulli A & Reeves A, Am J Psychol, 120, 4 (2007) 521.

  • D’Angiulli A, Runge M, Faulkner A, Zakizadeh J, Chan A & Morcos S, Front Psychol, 4 (2013) 1.

  • Herssens J & Heylighen A, Proceedings, Sensory Urbanism Conference (University of Strathclyde, UK) 2008, 102.

  • Licona A R, Liu F, Pinzon D, Torabi A, Boulanger P, Lelevé A, Moreau R, Pham M T & Tavakoli M, Haptic Interfaces for Accessibility, Health, and Enhanced Quality of Life (Springer), 2020, 183.

  • Polanyi M, Philosophy, 41, 155 (1966) 1.

  • Scott W T, Philos Q, 21, 82 (1971) 22.

  • Cruse D & Clifton C, Bull Psychon Soc, 6, (6) (1975) 585.

  • Denis M, Gonc M R & Memmi D, Neuropsychologia, 33 (11) (1995) 1511.

  • Lupyan G & Lewis M, Lang Cogn Neurosci, 34 (10) (2019) 1319.

  • Osgood C E, Suci G J & Tannenbaum P H, The Measurement of Meaning (UoI Press), 1957, 1.

  • Anderson B L, Curr Biol, 21, (24) (2011) R978.

  • Schlüter N & Faul F, J Vis, 19, (4) (2019) 24.

  • Xiao B, Zhao S, Gkioulekas I, Bi W & Bala K, J Vis, 20, (7) (2020) 10.

  • Baddeley A, The Handbook of Memory Disorders (John Wiley & Sons), 2003, 1-13.

  • Zadeh M H, Wang D & Kubica E, Multimed Syst, 13 (4) (2008) 275.

  • Bi W, Jin P, Nienborg H & Xiao B, J Vision, 19 (5) (2019) 18.


Abstract Views: 42

PDF Views: 23




  • Modelling and Prediction of Visual-Haptic Perception in Textiles

Abstract Views: 42  |  PDF Views: 23

Authors

K. V. Rakhin
Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502 285, India
Prasad S. Onkar
Department of Design, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 502 285, India
J. Hayavadana
Department of Textile Technology, University College of Technology, Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India

Abstract


The study examines the contact and non-contact assessment of textile modalities under three task conditions, namely visual, haptic, and visual-haptic combination. A comparative analysis shows that the cues perceived by flattened fabrics are insufficient to stimulate the perception of softness during the purely visual condition. At the same time, the spatial deformation caused by the action significantly stimulates the perception of softness in the purely haptic state. While in the visual-haptic dual condition, the spatial deformation causes a folding formation that stimulates the perception of softness by matching the visual and haptic cue information. The study outcomes are theoretically defined as Perceptual Conflict of Interest (PCI), which further focuses on the PCI model of fabric perceptual prediction. Accordingly, this study also discusses different concepts of sensory cue tracking and their impact on cloth modality assessment.

Keywords


Fabric hand feel, Fabric softness, Perceptual control theory, Subjective evaluation, Textile e-commerce, Visualhaptic dual conditions

References