Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rastogi, Rakhi
- Aortic Arch Variations: Embryological Basis and Surgical Correlation
Abstract Views :206 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Delhi-Haridwar By Pass Road, Meerut (U.P.), IN
1 Department of Anatomy, Subharti Medical College, Delhi-Haridwar By Pass Road, Meerut (U.P.), IN
Source
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Vol 4, No 1 (2010), Pagination: 71-73Abstract
Branching patterns of the aortic arch were studied in 60 formalin fixed cadavers of both sexes of Indian origin, aged 40-70. The dissections were carried out and the aortic arch variations were observed after exposing the thoracic and cervical region during routine dissection for undergraduate M.B.B.S. students in Subharti Medical College, Meerut. The usual three branched aortic arch was found in 57 cadavers. Variations were found in 3 cadavers. Variations include common trunk of origin for brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery, left vertebral artery arising directly from arch of aorta and brachiocephalic trunk arising from left side of aortic arch. In the present study the variations are discussed along with embryological basis and surgical correlation. Sometime these variations are merely observed as autopsy findings.Keywords
Aortic Arch, Left Common Carotid Artery, Vertebral Artery, Brachiocephalic Trunk
References
- Sadler TW. Langman’s medical embryology, med tour press international (Warszawa) 1993; pp. 207-219.
- Alek san drowicz R. two cases of absence of the brachicephalic trunk. Folia Morphol 1967; 26 : 235-237.
- Roguin N, Sujov P, Shapir Y, Peleg H, Riss E. Single arterial trunk arising from the aortic arch associated with coarctation of aorta. Pediatr Radiol 1982; 12: 39-40.
- Sora M, Strobl B, Forstner – streffleur S, Staykov D. aortic arch variations analysed by using plastination. Clinical Anat 2002; 15 : 379-383.
- Kozielec T. Origin of left subclavian artery from the arterial duct in fetal life in man. Folia Morphol 1977; 36: 191-194.
- Bernardil, Deton P. Angiographic study of a rare anomalous origin of the vertebral artery. Neuroradiology 1975; 9: 43 –47.
- Lemke AJ, Benndorf G, Liebig T, Felix R. Anomalous origin of the right vertebral artery, review of the literature and case report of right vertebral artery origin distal to the left subclavian artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20: 1318-1321.
- Czerwinski F, Mierzwa A, Krzanowski K, Michalska G. Rare case of arteries branching directly from aortic arch in the man. Folia Morphol 1993; 53: 223-231.
- Lize J. Abnormal origin of the great vessels from the aortic arch. Folia Morphol 1970; 29: 401-402.
- Bhatia K, Ghabriel MN, Henneberg M. Anatomical variations in the branches the human aortic arch, a recent study of a south Australian population. Folia Morphol 2005; 64 (3): 217-223.
- Georgios Paras Kevas, Paris Agios, Marios stavarakas. Left common carotid artery arising from the brachiocephalic trunk. Cases Journal 2008, 1: 83.
- Soubhagya R, Naya K, Mangala M Pai, Latha V Prabhu, Sujatha D Costa, Prakash Shetty. Anatomical organization of aortic arch variations in India: Embryological basis and review. J Vasc Bras 2006; 5 (2): 95-100.
- Jerzy st. Gielecki, Renata Wilk, Bozenasy C. Digital-image analysis of the aortic arch’s development and its variations. Folia Morphol 2004; Vol 63 (4): 449-454.
- Panicker H.K, Tarneka A, Dhawane V, Ghosh SK. Anomalous origin of left vertebral artery-embryological basis and applied aspects. J Anat. Soc. India 2002; 51 (2): 234-235.
- Gupta Roopam Kumar, Mehta CD. Anomalous origin and potentially hazardous course of the brachiocephalic artery. J Anat. Soc India 2007; 56 (2) 38-41.
- Satyapal KS, Singaram S, Pratab P, Kalideen JM, Robbs JV. Aortic arch branch variations-case report and angiographic analysis. S Atr surg. 2003; 41: 48-50.
- Moskowitz WB, Topazo. The implications of common brachiocephalic trunk on associated congenital cardiovascular defects and their management. Cardiol Young 2003; 13: 537-543.
- Matula C, Trattnig S, Tschabitscher M, Day JD, Koos WT. the course of the prevertebral segment of the vertebral artery, anatomy and clinical significance. Surg. Neurol 1997; 48 (2): 125-131.
- Mukadam GA, Hoskings E. Aberrant brachiocephalic artery precluding placement of tracheostomy. Anesthesia 2002; 57: 297-298.
- Muhammad JK, Major E, Wood A, Patton DW. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: haemorrhagic complications and the vascular anatomy of the anterior neck, a review based on 497 cases. Int. J oral maxillofac. Surg. 2000; 29 (3): 217-222.
- Clinical Anatomy of Great Cardiac Vein and Triangle of Brocq and Mouchet
Abstract Views :284 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Anatomy Subharti Medical College, Meerut, U.P, IN
2 Department of Anatomy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Anatomy Subharti Medical College, Meerut, U.P, IN
2 Department of Anatomy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Vol 5, No 1 (2011), Pagination: 115-117Abstract
The aim of this work is to determine morphological and topographical aspects of great cardiac vein, especially its relation to the branches of left coronary artery. Examination of the great cardiac vein, left coronary artery and its branches was carried out on 45 specimens of hearts of both sexes aged between 18-50 years and without any known history of changes in cardiac pathology. The techniques applied by us were retrograde injection of great cardiac vein with ink and gelatin mixture followed by anatomical dissection of great cardiac vein, left coronary artery and its branches. The topography and morphology of great cardiac vein and its correlation with branches of left coronary artery as well as triangle of Brocq and Mouchet formed by them were examined and then clinical significance determined.Keywords
Human Hearts, Great Cardiac Vein, Triangle of Brocq and Mouchet.References
- Bochenek A, Reicher M. Anatomia Czlowieka 4th Edition PZWL, Warszawa. 1960; Vol 5.
- Nomina Anatomia 6th Edition, Churchill Livingstone London 1989.
- Oesterle SN. Where cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology merge: the future of catheter-based interventions for cardiovascular disease. Heart surg forum. 2001; 4: 290-296.
- Pejkovic B, Bogdanovic D. The great cardiac vein. Surg Radiol Anat. 1992; 14: 23-28.
- Subrahmanyam BV. Modi’s Medical Jurisprudence and Toxicology, 22nd Edition New Delhi: Butterworths India. 1999; 555 – 557.
- Truex RC, Angulo AW. Comparative study of the arterial and venous systems of the ventricular myocardium with special reference to the coronary sinus. Anat Rec 1952; 113: 467 – 484.
- Maric I, Bobinac D, Ostojic Lj, Petkovic M, Dujmovic M. Tributaries of the human and canine coronary sinus. Acta Anat 1996; 156: 61 – 69.
- Schaffler GJ, Groell R, Peichel K.H, Rienmuller R. Imaging the coronary venous drainage system using electron-beam CT. Surg. Radiol Anat. 2000; 22: 35 – 39.
- Ortale JR, Gabriel EA, Iost C, Marquez CQ. The anatomy of coronary sinus and its tributaries. Surg Radiol Anat. 2001; 23: 15 – 21.
- M. Kaczmarek, F. Czerwinski. Assessment of the course of the great cardiac vein in a selected number of human hearts. Folia Morphol. 2007; 66 (3): 190 – 193.
- Solorzano J, Taitelbaum G, Chiu RC. Reterograde coronary sinus perfusion for myocardial protection during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1978; 25: 201 – 208.
- von Ludinghausen M. Clinical anatomy of cardiac veins Vv Cardiacae. Surg Radiol. Anat. 1987; 9: 159 – 168.
- James TN, Sherf L, Schlant RC, Silverman ME. Anatomy of heart. In: Hurst JW. The heart, arteries and veins. New York: Mc Graw- Hill. 1982; p 37 – 39.
- O’ Riordan BG, Cade RJ. Survival following non penetrating trauma of the great cardiac vein. Aust NZJ Surg. 1992; 62: 590 – 591.
- Gerber TC, Sheedy PF, Bell MR, Hayes DL, Rumberger JA, Behrenbeck T, Holmes DR, Schwartz RS. Evaluation of the coronary venous system using election beam computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2001; 17: 65 – 75.