International Journal of Financial Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Bank-Specific Factors on the Commercial Banks’ Performance:The CAMEL Model and the Case of Ethiopian Banks


Affiliations
1 School of Commerce, College of Business and Economics, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The study has investigated one of the key research questions: how bank-specific factors are related to bank performance? The model constructed is framed based on the commonly used supervisory tool to monitor bank performance: CAMEL. This consists of elements such as Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earning and Liquidity. It has used six variables representing each of the components and runs a regression model based on fixed and random models. The outcome shows that many of the bank-specific factors have a significant statistical relationship with performance measures. Despite the mixed result in the various models, the study explored that a bank’s capital holding, asset quality and business diversification, cost control and liquidity positions are important parts of the management decisions that have a significant influence on its performance.

Keywords

Performance, Commercial Banks, Ethiopia, CAMEL Model.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Allen, F., & Carletti, E. (2008). Mark-to-Market Accounting and Liquidity Pricing. Forthcoming, Journal of Accounting and Economics, (finance.wharton.upenn.edu/%7Eallenf/download/Vita/ Allen-Carletti-MMA-200706- final.pdf).

  • Al-Tamimi, H., Hassan, A. (2010) Factors Infuluncing Performance of the UAE Islamic and Conventional National Banks. Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Sharjah.

  • Altunbas, Y., Evans, L., & Molyneux, P. (2001). Ownership and efficiency in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 33(4), 926-954.

  • Altunbas, Y., Gardener, E., Molyneux, P., & Moore, B. (2001). Efficiency in European banking. European Economic Review, (45), 1931-1955.

  • Berger, A., & Bouwman, C. (2009). Bank liquidity creation. Rev Financ Stud., 22(9), 3779-3837.

  • Berger, A. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking, Tests of market- power and efficientstructure hypotheses. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404-431.

  • Bourke, P. (1989). Concentration and other determinants of bank profitability in Europe, North America and Australia. Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 65-79.

  • Dang, U. (2011). The CAMEL Rating System in Banking Supervision: A Case Study of Arcada University of Applied Sciences. International Business.

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (1999). Determinants of commercial bank interest margin and profitability: Some international evidence. World Bank Economic Review, 13(2), 379-408.

  • Diamond, D. (2000). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of financial Studies, 51, 393-414.

  • Gujarati, D., & Porter, D. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). New York, McGraw-Hill.

  • Kumbirai, M., & Webb, R. (2010). A financial ratio analysis of commercial bank performance in South Africa. African Review of Economics and Finance, 2(1), 30-54.

  • lhomovich, S. E. (2009). Factors Affecting the Performance of Foreign Banks in Malaysia Master of Science (Banking), College of Business (Finance and Banking), University Utara Malaysia.

  • Liu, H., & Wilson, J. (2010). The profitability of banks in Japan. Applied Financial Economics, 20, 1851-1866.

  • Mishkin, F. (2001). The economics of money, banking, and financial markets. Addison-Wesley series in economics

  • Nachane, D., & Ghosh, S. (2007). An empirical analysis of the off-balance sheet activities of Indian banks. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 6, 39-45.

  • Nassreddine, G., Fatma, S., & Anis, J. (2013). Determinants of bank performance: Viewing test by cognitive mapping technique a case of Biat. International Review of Management and Business Research, 2(1), 20-35

  • National Bank of Ethiopia Annual, report of various times accessed at www.nbe.gov.et

  • National Bank of Ethiopia various Directives accessed at www. nbe.gov.et: Directives SBB27/01

  • Ongore, V. (2011). Determinants of financial performance of commercial banks in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(1), 237-252.

  • Rahman, A. A., Mansor, I., & Meera, A. K. M. (2009). Lending structure and bank insolvency risk: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Business & Policy Research, 4(2), 189-211.

  • Rogers, E. (1998). Non-traditional activities and the efficiency of U.S. commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(4), 467-82.

  • Rose, P., & Hudgins, S. (2010). Bank management and financial services (8th ed.). McGrawHill/Irwin.

  • Rosse, J. N., & Panzar, J. C. (1977). Chamberlin vs. Robinson: An empirical test for monopoly rents.

  • Said, R. M., & Tumin, M. H. (2011). Performance and financial ratios of commercial banks in Malaysia and China. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(2), 157-169.

  • Samad, A. (2004). Performance of interest-free Islamic banks vis-a-vis interest-based conventional banks of Bahrain. Journal of Economics and Management, 12(2), 1-15.

  • The Money and banking Proclamation No. 83/1994


Abstract Views: 204

PDF Views: 0




  • Empirical Evidence of the Impact of Bank-Specific Factors on the Commercial Banks’ Performance:The CAMEL Model and the Case of Ethiopian Banks

Abstract Views: 204  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abdurezak Mohammed Kuhil
School of Commerce, College of Business and Economics, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia

Abstract


The study has investigated one of the key research questions: how bank-specific factors are related to bank performance? The model constructed is framed based on the commonly used supervisory tool to monitor bank performance: CAMEL. This consists of elements such as Capital Adequacy, Asset Quality, Management, Earning and Liquidity. It has used six variables representing each of the components and runs a regression model based on fixed and random models. The outcome shows that many of the bank-specific factors have a significant statistical relationship with performance measures. Despite the mixed result in the various models, the study explored that a bank’s capital holding, asset quality and business diversification, cost control and liquidity positions are important parts of the management decisions that have a significant influence on its performance.

Keywords


Performance, Commercial Banks, Ethiopia, CAMEL Model.

References