Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Do IPOs in Cold Markets Provide Better Returns?


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Construction Management & Research (NICMAR), Ponda, Goa, India
2 Dept. of Commerce & Management, Shree Damodar College of Commerce & Economics, Margao, Goa, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Significant listing day returns for IPOs is a phenomenon that is observed when companies go public. Using a larger timeframe (1999-2014), we attempt to determine the long-run performance of underpriced IPOs issued in an emerging economy such as India during the hot and cold IPO markets for 36-months. The results indicate that IPOs perform significantly better when issued during cold markets. We find that the distribution of returns is the same across cold and hot markets at specific periods during the 36-month period of study.

Keywords

IPO, Cold v/s Hot, Returns, Emerging Economy/India, BHAR, Event Study.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aggarwal, R., Prabhala, N. R., & Puri, M. (2002). Institutional allocation in initial public offerings: Empirical evidence. Journal of Finance, 57(3).
  • Aggarwal, R., & Rivoli, P. (1990). Fads in the initial public offering market. Journal of Financial Management, 19(4), 45-57.
  • Banerjee, S., Dai, L., & Shrestha, K. (2011). Cross-country IPOs: What explains differences in underpricing? Journal of Corporate Finance, 17(5), 1289-1305.
  • Barber, B. M., & Lyon, J. D. (1997). Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(3), 341-372.
  • Cook, D., Jarrell, S., & Kieschnick, R. (2003). Investor sentiment and IPO cycles. Unpublished Working Paper, University of Mississippi.
  • Dutta, A., & Swain, S. K. (2012). Post listing behaviour of the IPO on the Indian stock market. International Journal of Financial Management, 2(1), 7-13.
  • Fama, E. F. (1998). Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 283-306.
  • Faugeron-Crouzet, A., Ginglinger, E., & Vijayraghavan, V. (2003). French IPO returns and subsequent security offerings: Signaling hypothesis versus market feedback hypothesis.
  • Guo, R. (2005). Information Collection and IPO Underpricing. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 25, 5-19.
  • Hall, P. (1992). On the removal of skewness by transformation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodical), 54(1), 221-228.
  • Helwege, J., & Liang, N. (2004). Initial public offerings in hot and cold markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 3, 541-569.
  • Ibbotson, R. (1975). Price performance of common stock new issues. Journal of Financial Economics, 2(3), 235-272.
  • Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. (1994). The post-issue operating performance of IPO firms. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1699-1726.
  • Kooli, M. & Suret, J.-M. (2001). The after market performance of initial public offerings in Canada. Scientific Series. ISSN 1198-8177.
  • Levis, M. (1993). The long-run performance of initial public offerings: The UK experience 1980-1988. Financial Management, 28-41.
  • Loughran, T., & Ritter, J. R. (1995). The new issues puzzle. The Journal of Finance, 50(1), 23-51.
  • Loughran, T., Ritter, J., & Rydqvist, K. (1994). Initial public offerings: International insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2(2), 165-199.
  • Lyon, J. D., Barber, B. M., & Tsai, C. L. (1999). Improved methods for tests of long-run abnormal stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 54(1), 165-201.
  • Pandya, F. (2016). After market pricing performance of Initial Public Offerings (IPO). Jindal Journal of Business Research, 5(1), 1-16.
  • Prakash, B. (2011). The Indian economy since 1991 (2 Ed.). Pearson Education India.
  • Purnanandam, A. K., & Swaminathan, B. (2004). Are IPOs really underpriced? Review of Financial, 17, 811-848.
  • Ritter, J. (1991). The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance, 3-27.
  • Ritter, J. (2002). Differences between European and American IPO markets. European Financial Management, 9(4).
  • Schaub, M. (2011). Does market timing or issue type affect the long-run performance of UK American depository receipts listed on the New York Stock exchange? Journal of Asset Management, 12(3), 157-162.
  • Seshadev, S., & Rajib, P. (2010). After market pricing performance of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs): Indian IPO Market 2002-2006. VIKALPA, pp. 27-43.
  • Shah, A. (2016). For most IPOs, listing day is better than one-year returns. Retrieved from http://www.livemint.com/Money/Rwr4QsmRHaJDAODJ8iBGiJ/For-most-IPOs-listing-day-is-better-than-oneyear-returns.htm. (accessed April 24, 2017).

Abstract Views: 231

PDF Views: 0




  • Do IPOs in Cold Markets Provide Better Returns?

Abstract Views: 231  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Kedar Mukund Phadke
National Institute of Construction Management & Research (NICMAR), Ponda, Goa, India
Manoj Subhash Kamat
Dept. of Commerce & Management, Shree Damodar College of Commerce & Economics, Margao, Goa, India

Abstract


Significant listing day returns for IPOs is a phenomenon that is observed when companies go public. Using a larger timeframe (1999-2014), we attempt to determine the long-run performance of underpriced IPOs issued in an emerging economy such as India during the hot and cold IPO markets for 36-months. The results indicate that IPOs perform significantly better when issued during cold markets. We find that the distribution of returns is the same across cold and hot markets at specific periods during the 36-month period of study.

Keywords


IPO, Cold v/s Hot, Returns, Emerging Economy/India, BHAR, Event Study.

References