Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Formability Process Parameters in Dynamic Strain Ageing Region of Austenitic Stainless Steel


Affiliations
1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, GRIET, Hyderabad 500 090, India
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India
3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281 406, India
 

The consumption of Austenitic Stainless-Steel ASS 304 has been increasing recently in the outer body of Automobile applications. Sheet Metal Forming is one of the processes used to convert ASS 304 sheet into an end product. ASS 304 has good ductility with the rise in temperature up to 450<sup>o</sup>C and later dynamic strain aging (DSA) in the temperature range 450- 600<sup>o</sup>C. Formability studies of ASS 304 in the DSA region and the effect of process parameters like anisotropy and strain rate are investigated in the present paper. Stretch forming Investigations have been carried out at a temperature of 500<sup>o</sup>C in two quasi-static strain rate ranges 1x 10<sup>-4</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> and 1x 10<sup>-1</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> concerning three orientations parallel (R<sub>0</sub>), diagonal (R<sub>45</sub>) and Transverse(R<sub>90</sub>) to Rolling Direction. The experiments were carried out at both the necking and fracture regions. Deformed specimens' major and minor strains are measured to plot Fracture Forming limit Diagrams, strain distribution, and limiting Dome height. Particular attention is given to the evaluation of strain rate and orientation of the sheet concerning rolling direction on formability.

Keywords

ASS 304, Dynamic Strain Ageing (DSA), Forming Limit Diagram (FLD), Limiting Dome Height (LDH), Strain Rate, Strain Distribution.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Alomari, & Abdullah S., Materials at High Temperatures, (2021) 1.

  • Lakshmi A, Buddi T, Subbiah R, & Bandhavi C, E3S Web of Conf, 184 (2020) 01036.

  • Lakshmi A A, Rao C S, Gangadhar J, Srinivasu C, & Singh S K, Mat Today: Proc, 4 2 (2017) 946.

  • Lakshmi A A, Rao C S, Srikanth M, Faisal K, Fayaz K, & Singh S K, Mat Today: Proc, 5 2 (2018) 3704.

  • Lakshmi A A, Ch Srinivasa Rao & Buddi T, Mat Today: Proc, 18 (2019) 2814.

  • Lakshmi A A, Rao C, Kotkunde N, Subbiah R, & Singh S K, Int J Mech Eng Techno,l 9 12 (2018) 403.

  • Reddy D M, Lakshmi A A & ul Haq. A., Mat Today: Proc, 19 (2019) 366.

  • Lakshmi A A, Rao C S, Gangadhar J, & Singh S K, J of Adv in Technol and Eng Res, 2 (2016) 52.

  • Serafim F M F, Oguocha I N A, Odeshi A G, Evitts R, Gerspacher R J, Ohaeri E G, & Alabi W O, J Mat Eng Perfor, 30 5 (2021) 3771.

  • Lakshmi A A, Ch S R, Sateesh N, & Subbiah R, Adv Mat Process Technol, (2021) 1.

  • Jayahari L, Sasidhar P V, Reddy P P, BaluNaik B, Gupta A K, & Singh S K, J King Saud Uni-Eng Sci, 26 1 (2014) 21.

  • Diepold B, Neumeier S, Meermeier A, Höppel H W, Sebald T, & Göken M, Adv Eng Mat, 23 10 (2021) 2001501.

  • Liu W & Jun-he L. Intern J of Miner, Meta and Mat, 28 (2021) 854.

  • Lade J, Singh S K, Banoth B N, & Gupta A K, In AIP Conf Proc American Inst Phy, 1567 1 (2013) 378.

  • Karthik V, Murugan S, Parameswaran P, Venkiteswaran C N, Gopal K A, Muralidharan N G, & Kasiviswanathan K V, Energy Proc, 7 (2011) 257.

  • Lee S Y, Takushima C, Hamada J I, & Nakada N, Acta Materia, 205 (2021) 116560.

  • Babu K A, Mandal S, Athreya C N, Shakthipriya B & Sarma V S, Mater & Des, 115 (2017) 262.

  • Bandyopadhyay K, Basak S, Prasad K S, Lee M G, Panda S K, & Lee J, Intern J Solids and Struct, 156 (2019) 263280.

  • Kotkunde N, Srinivasan S, Krishna G, Gupta A K, & Singh S K, Trans of Nonferr Met Soc of China, 26 3 (2016) 736.

  • Gupta A K, Singh S K, Reddy S, & Hariharan G, Mat & Des, 35 (2012) 589.

  • Hecker S S, Sheet Met Ind, 52 (1975) 671.

  • Ghosh A K, & Hecker S S, Meta Trans, 5 (1974) 2161.

  • Nakazima K, Kikuma T, Hasuka K, Yawata Technol Rep, 264 (1968) 8517.

  • Volk W, Groche P, Brosius A, Ghiotti A, Kinsey B L, Liewald M, Madej L, Min J, & Yanagimoto J, CIRP Ann Manuf Technol, 68 (2019) 775.


Abstract Views: 64

PDF Views: 49




  • Effect of Formability Process Parameters in Dynamic Strain Ageing Region of Austenitic Stainless Steel

Abstract Views: 64  |  PDF Views: 49

Authors

Anitha Lakshmi
Department of Mechanical Engineering, GRIET, Hyderabad 500 090, India
Srinivasa Rao Ch.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India
Piyush Singhal
Department of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281 406, India

Abstract


The consumption of Austenitic Stainless-Steel ASS 304 has been increasing recently in the outer body of Automobile applications. Sheet Metal Forming is one of the processes used to convert ASS 304 sheet into an end product. ASS 304 has good ductility with the rise in temperature up to 450<sup>o</sup>C and later dynamic strain aging (DSA) in the temperature range 450- 600<sup>o</sup>C. Formability studies of ASS 304 in the DSA region and the effect of process parameters like anisotropy and strain rate are investigated in the present paper. Stretch forming Investigations have been carried out at a temperature of 500<sup>o</sup>C in two quasi-static strain rate ranges 1x 10<sup>-4</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> and 1x 10<sup>-1</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> concerning three orientations parallel (R<sub>0</sub>), diagonal (R<sub>45</sub>) and Transverse(R<sub>90</sub>) to Rolling Direction. The experiments were carried out at both the necking and fracture regions. Deformed specimens' major and minor strains are measured to plot Fracture Forming limit Diagrams, strain distribution, and limiting Dome height. Particular attention is given to the evaluation of strain rate and orientation of the sheet concerning rolling direction on formability.

Keywords


ASS 304, Dynamic Strain Ageing (DSA), Forming Limit Diagram (FLD), Limiting Dome Height (LDH), Strain Rate, Strain Distribution.

References