Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Seismic Response of Y-Shape Multi-Storey Building with Optimum Location of Shear Walls


Affiliations
1 Department of Civil Engineering, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226031, India
2 Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow 226021, India
3 Department of Civil Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India
 

Shear walls have extremely high in-plane strength and stiffness and also can counter heavy lateral loads making them quite advantageous in high-rise buildings. It is suggested to incorporate them in structures built in the places where there are chances of large intensity earthquakes or high winds. Positioning of the shear wall plays a very critical task in an asymmetric and irregular building subjected to earthquake forces. In our study, the main aim is to locate the advantageous position of the shear wall in Y-shaped asymmetric and irregular G+14 building in zone IV. The study is done by using a software package, CSI ETABS ver. 18.0.2. We have carried out Response Spectrum Analysis and Time History Analysis for this study. In this study, fourteen test models with unique location of shear wall are considered and parameters such as Time Period, Storey Displacement, Static Eccentricity, Storey Drift, Joint Displacement, Base Shear, and Base Force, are compared with the bare model. Thus, the best location of shear wall is suggested based on models having least static eccentricity, minimum displacement, Minimum drift, Minimum time period, Minimum joint displacement and Maximum base shear.

Keywords

Shear Wall, Torsion, Static Eccentricity, Irregularity, Seismic Behavior.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Dutta S, & Roy R, J Eng Mech, 138(1) (2012) 1.

  • Gokhan T, & Khalid M A, Kon J Eng Sci, 8(9) (2020) 601.

  • Chintanapakdee C, & Chopra A K, J Struct Eng, 130(8) (2004) 1177.

  • Jeyasehar CA, Muthmani K S, & Lakhmanan K, Int J Eng Mater Sci, 16(4) (2009) 220.

  • Kaplan H, Yilmaz S, Nihat C, & Atimtay E, Sadhana, 36(1) (2011) 17.

  • Das P K, Dutta SC, & Datta T K, Nat Hazards Rev, 22(2) (2020) 04020062

  • Jain S K, Murty C V R, Dayal U, Arlekar J N, & Chaubey S K, The republic day earthquake in the land of MK Gandhi, the father of the Nation, EERI, field report, USA and Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur (2001).

  • Riddell R, Llera J C, & Wood S L, Struct characteristics and damage statistics for the building inventory in Vina del Mar, Urbana, IL: Thesis, University of Illinois (1987).

  • Gudainiyan J, & Parihar H.S, Mater Sci Eng, 1116 (2021) 012155.

  • FEMA: 450 (Part-1), NEHRP Recommended provision for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2003).

  • FEMA: 450 (Part-2), NEHRP Recommended provision for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, (2003).

  • IS: 1893 (Part-1) Criteria for earthquake-resistant design of structure, (2016).

  • Ahmet T, & Nadeem S, Arab J Sci Eng, 38(10) (2012) 2639.

  • Alashker Y, Nazar S, & Ismaiel M, Open Civ Eng J, 5(02) (2015), 203.

  • Dutta SC, Das PK, & Sengupta P, Struct Eng Int, 27(4) (2017) 526.

  • Siamak T, & Mahdi R, Front Struct Civ Eng, 14(5) (2020) 1131.

  • Jain SK, & Mandal UK, Struct Eng, 121(6) (1995) 1004.

  • Chintanapakdee C, & Chopra A K, Earthq. Eng Struct. Dyn, 32(3) (2003) 417.

  • Eurocode 8 (Part-1) Design of structures for earthquake resistance-:General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings,(2004).


Abstract Views: 90

PDF Views: 57




  • Seismic Response of Y-Shape Multi-Storey Building with Optimum Location of Shear Walls

Abstract Views: 90  |  PDF Views: 57

Authors

Rajiv Banerjee
Department of Civil Engineering, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow 226031, India
Jyoti Bhushan Srivastava
Department of Civil Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow 226021, India
Nakul Gupta
Department of Civil Engineering, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India

Abstract


Shear walls have extremely high in-plane strength and stiffness and also can counter heavy lateral loads making them quite advantageous in high-rise buildings. It is suggested to incorporate them in structures built in the places where there are chances of large intensity earthquakes or high winds. Positioning of the shear wall plays a very critical task in an asymmetric and irregular building subjected to earthquake forces. In our study, the main aim is to locate the advantageous position of the shear wall in Y-shaped asymmetric and irregular G+14 building in zone IV. The study is done by using a software package, CSI ETABS ver. 18.0.2. We have carried out Response Spectrum Analysis and Time History Analysis for this study. In this study, fourteen test models with unique location of shear wall are considered and parameters such as Time Period, Storey Displacement, Static Eccentricity, Storey Drift, Joint Displacement, Base Shear, and Base Force, are compared with the bare model. Thus, the best location of shear wall is suggested based on models having least static eccentricity, minimum displacement, Minimum drift, Minimum time period, Minimum joint displacement and Maximum base shear.

Keywords


Shear Wall, Torsion, Static Eccentricity, Irregularity, Seismic Behavior.

References