A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Nisar, Ubair
- Parity in Socio-Economic Status of Fishers and Primary Producers of Coastal India
Authors
1 Fisheries Economics Extension and Statistics Division, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, IN
2 Division of Forecasting and Agricultural Systems Modelling, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute (IASRI), PUSA, New Delhi, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Economics and Development, Vol 6, No 8 (2018), Pagination: 1-12Abstract
Objective: The comparison of the socio-economic status of fishers and primary producers of the coastal India would tried to find out the potential gaps and suggested the measures to be taken for improving their living standards.
Methods: The NSSO-68th round unit level data of fishers and primary producers for all the coastal states and UTs except Goa and Lakshadweep Islands was retrieved and used in the study. The results are represented with frequency tables and bar diagrams. The Z test to compare means and population proportions were used to test for its significant difference.
Findings: The results revealed that the parity is existed between the fishers and primary producers with respect to their family size, religion, social group, training, subsidiary activity, employment status, land ownership, savings account and membership with associations. However, there is no parity in the literacy, MGNREG beneficiaries, land utilising for cultivation and average monthly expenditure. The literates among fishers and agricultural households are found to be more than the rural average literacy rate. There is scope to increase the MGNREG beneficiaries among fishers through proper implementation of the scheme to reduce the unemployment during lean season as their percentage was found to be less than the agricultural households. The fishers engaged in subsidiary activity were found to be less. Since the average income of fishers was less than the agricultural households, motivation of fishers to take up subsidiary activities may provide them to earn additional income to overcome the debt trap and during lean seasons. The average monthly consumption expenditure of fishers was comparatively lesser than the agricultural households because of their poor accessibility to various goods and services.
Application: The living standards of agricultural dependent population are comparatively lower than the people of any other sectors. The fisheries sector, being the fastest growing sector among the allied sectors of agriculture, the benefits thus obtained can be distributed in favour of poor fishers to improve their living conditions by adopting proper policies.
Keywords
Parity, Fishers, Primary Producers, NSSO Data, Data Retrieval, Subsidiary Activity, and MPCE.Full Text
References
- S. Thenmozhi, P. Thilagavathi. Impact of agriculture on Indian Economy. International Research Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development. 2014; 96-105.
- Sector wise contribution of GDP of India. http://statisticstimes.com/economy/sectorwise-gdp-contribution-of-india.php. Date accessed: 21/03/2017.
- Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute. http://www.cmfri.org.in/. Date accessed: 08/08/2018.
- K. Padhi. Agricultural labour in India: A close look. Orissa Review. 2007; 23-28.
- S. Rameshkumar, A.J. Excelce, G. Padma Parvathy, T. Priyanka. Income and expenditure pattern of fisher folk in selected rural coastal villages of Tuticorin in Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 2011; 58(3), 153-155.
- S. Chattergee. Estimation of rural poverty: A discussion with reference to India. WYE City Group on Rural Development and Agriculture Household Income, at FAO Headquarters, Rome. 2009.
- National Sample Survey Organisation 68th round. http://www.ilo.org/surveydata/index.php/catalog/339/study-description. Date accessed: 16/06/2017.
- R.S. Biradar. Fisheries statistics, course manual, Second Edition. Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai. 2002; 159-165.
- Ministry of statistics and programme implementation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ministry_of_Statistics_and_Programme_Implementation. Date accessed: 20/03/2018.