Indian Journal of Economics and Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reviewing Role of Market-Based Instruments in Addressing Climate Change


Affiliations
1 Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India
 

Objectives: In this paper we will critically review the reliability of Market-Based Instruments (Tradable permits and Pollution tax, and Hybrid Policies) to counter the problem of global climate change.

Methods/Statistical Analysis: By doing a survey of literature, graphical analysis of the carbon footprint of countries and studying past experiences at global and regional level, we will try to find the basic prerequisites needed for a market-based policy to work. We will then see whether or not these prerequisites conform at the global level.

Findings: We find that though MBIs have shown positive results at the regional level, the governments of those regions played an indispensable role behind the success of these policy instruments. At the same time, MBIs at the global level implemented after Kyoto Protocol failed in their aim to curb the emissions. In fact the data suggests that the carbon emission of the world actually increased after the Kyoto Protocol was implemented. The World Bank data on CO2 emissions also points towards carbon leakage from developed to developing countries. Hence, we agree with the general economic consensus that tradable permits and pollution tax can be powerful tools to curb emission at regional level. But, as the evidence suggest, we cannot rely on them to counter global climate change.

Application/Improvements: We propose that instead of relying on a single global policy, governments of regional trading blocs should establish their own MBI across the globe. Also, instead of carbon emissions, we must monitor the carbon footprint of nations so that leakages can be accounted for.


Keywords

Market-Based Instruments, Climate Change, Global Warming, CO2 Emissions, Kyoto Protocol.
User
Notifications

  • T.R. Karl, J.M. Melillo, T.C. Peterson, S.J. Hassol. Global climate change impacts in the United States: highlights. 2009, 1-196.

  • O. Brown. Migration and climate change. International Organization for Migration. 2008, 1-64.

  • W.R. Cline. Global warming and agriculture. Finance and Development. 2008, 1-5.

  • H. Melissa, A. Shardul, S. Paul, S. Arun, H. Danielle, L. Holger, Mahesh S. Poverty and climate change: reducing the vulnerability of the poor through adaptation. 2017.

  • WEF: Environment dominates threats to global economy.http://www.climatechangenews.com/2017/01/11/wef-environment-dominates-threats-to-global-economy/. Date accessed: 11/01/2017.

  • A. Blackman, W. Harrington. The use of economic incentives in developing countries: Lessons from international experience with industrial air pollution. The Journal of Environment & Development. 2000; 9(1), 5-44.

  • S.R. Goers, A.F. Wagner, J. Wegmayr. New and old market-based instruments for climate change policy. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.2010; 12(1), 1-30.

  • M. Weitzman. Prices vs. quantities. The review of economic studies. 1974; 41(4), 477-491.

  • M.J. Roberts, S. Michael. Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty. Journal of Public Economics. 1976; 5(3-4), 193-208.

  • W.J. McKibbin, P.J. Wilcoxen. A credible foundation for long term international cooperation on climate change.Centre for applied Macro-Economic analysis. 2006, 1-27.

  • R. Stavins, G. Chan, R. Stowe, R. Sweeney. The US sulphur dioxide cap and trade programme and lessons for climate policy.VOX CEPR's Policy Portal. 2012.

  • T. Laing, M. Sato, M. Grubb, C. Comberti. Assessing the effectiveness of the EU emissions trading system. Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. 2013, 1-35.

  • ETS reform: everything you need to know in a nutshell.http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/20150225STO26902/ets-reform-everything-you-need-to-know-in-a-nutshell. Date accessed: 06/07/2015.

  • J.E. Aldy, R.N. Stavins. The promise and problems of pricing carbon: theory and experience.The Journal of Environment & Development. 2012; 21(2), 152-180.

  • A. Tyagi. India’s climate change mitigation policies–a case for market based instruments. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. 2016.

  • R.N. Stavins. Policy instruments for climate change: how can national governments address a global problem? University of Chicago Legal Forum. 1997, 1-39.

  • R.N. Stavins. Transaction costs and tradeable permits. Journal of environmental economics and management. 1995; 29(2), 133-148.

  • K. Hasselmann, M. Latif, G. Hooss, C. Azar, O. Edenhofer, C.C. Jaeger, O.M. Johannessen, C. Kemfert, M. Welp, A. Wokaun. The challenge of long-term climate change. Science. 2003; 302 (5652), 1923-1925.

  • R. Aichele, G. Felbermayr. Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations. IFO Working Paper No. 103. 2011, 1-33.

  • R. Aichele, G. Felbermayr. Kyoto and carbon leakage: an empirical analysis of the carbon content of bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics. 2015; 97(1), 104-115.

  • O. Kuik, R. Gerlagh. Trade liberalization and carbon leakage. The Energy Journal. 2003; 24(3), 97-120.

  • A. Michaelowa, M. Stronzik, F. Eckermann, A. Hunt. Transaction costs of the Kyoto mechanisms. Climate policy.2003; 3(3), 261-278.

  • K.H. Olsen. The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: a review of the literature.Climatic Change. 2007; 84(1), 59-73.

  • Q. Buckholz. Russia and climate change: a looming threat. The Diplomat. 2016.


Abstract Views: 249

PDF Views: 132




  • Reviewing Role of Market-Based Instruments in Addressing Climate Change

Abstract Views: 249  |  PDF Views: 132

Authors

A. Bhatnagar
Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, 110067, India

Abstract


Objectives: In this paper we will critically review the reliability of Market-Based Instruments (Tradable permits and Pollution tax, and Hybrid Policies) to counter the problem of global climate change.

Methods/Statistical Analysis: By doing a survey of literature, graphical analysis of the carbon footprint of countries and studying past experiences at global and regional level, we will try to find the basic prerequisites needed for a market-based policy to work. We will then see whether or not these prerequisites conform at the global level.

Findings: We find that though MBIs have shown positive results at the regional level, the governments of those regions played an indispensable role behind the success of these policy instruments. At the same time, MBIs at the global level implemented after Kyoto Protocol failed in their aim to curb the emissions. In fact the data suggests that the carbon emission of the world actually increased after the Kyoto Protocol was implemented. The World Bank data on CO2 emissions also points towards carbon leakage from developed to developing countries. Hence, we agree with the general economic consensus that tradable permits and pollution tax can be powerful tools to curb emission at regional level. But, as the evidence suggest, we cannot rely on them to counter global climate change.

Application/Improvements: We propose that instead of relying on a single global policy, governments of regional trading blocs should establish their own MBI across the globe. Also, instead of carbon emissions, we must monitor the carbon footprint of nations so that leakages can be accounted for.


Keywords


Market-Based Instruments, Climate Change, Global Warming, CO2 Emissions, Kyoto Protocol.

References