Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Lifting the Poor in Nigeria:A Comparative Analyses of the Role of Microfinance Banks and Cooperatives


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, McPherson University, Ogun State, Nigeria
 

Objectives: This study investigates the role of microfinance banks (MFBs) and cooperatives in lifting the poor in Nigeria.

Methods/Statistical analysis: Analyses are carried out in relation to how accessible and effective the two institutions’ loans. The study employs survey methodology where interview is used to generate data. The interview is conducted in Ibadan, the capital of Oyo state, and Abeokuta, the capital of Ogun State in South-western part of Nigeria. In all, 166 respondents provided the information used for this study. Simple averages and percentages are used for analysis.

Findings: Findings reveal that it is difficult for the poor to access MFBs’ loans, and loan effectiveness analyses show that only middle income and rich people can benefit from MFBs’ loans.However,cooperatives’ loans are found to be more accessible and effective to the poor.

Improvements/Applications: The results of this study have important implication for poverty reduction, thereby recommends that cooperatives movement should be encouraged inNigeria.


Keywords

Microfinance Banks, Cooperatives, Comparative Analysis, The Poor, Nigeria.
User
Notifications

  • M. Kankwenda , L. Gregoire, H. Legros, H. Ouedraogo. Poverty eradication where stands AfricaUNDP.Business and Economics.2000.
  • C. Muller. Censored quintile regressions of chronic and transient seasonal poverty in Rwanda.Journal of African Economies. 2002; 1(4), 503-541.
  • P.V. Kwaghe. Poverty profile and its determinants among farming households in Borno state nigeria. Department of Agricultural Economics. 2006, 22-40.
  • F.F. Ahmed. Impact of youth empowerment scheme on poverty alleviation in Nigeria.International Journal ofBusiness Economics and Law. 2011; 4(1), 1-14.
  • M. LeBlanc,B. Kuhn, J. Blaylock. Poverty amidst plenty food insecurity in the United States. Agricultural Economics. 2005; 32(1), 159-173.
  • M. Obadan. Analytical framework for poverty reduction issues of economic guide versus other strategies. In Annual Conference of Nigerian Economic Society 1997.Obaseki ed. Nigeria Economic Society Ibadan.Science and Education. 1997.
  • J.K. Olayemi. A Survey of Approaches to Poverty Alleviation. Paper Presented at the NCEMA National Working on Integration of Poverty Alleviation Strategies into Plans and Programmes in Nigeria. NCEMA Ibadan. 1995, 11-16.
  • World development indicators. The WorldBank. 2015, 1-171.
  • The World Bank. Nigeria Economic Report. http://resourcedat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Nigeria-economic-report-2013.pdf. Date accessed: 05/2013.
  • S.M. Hashemi, S.R. Schuler, A. Riley. Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh.World Development. 1996; 24(4), 635–53.
  • D. Roodman, J. Morduch. The impact of microcredit on the poor in Bangladesh revisiting the evidence. The Journal of Development Studies. 2014; 50(4), 583-604.
  • B. Armendáriz de Aghion, J. Morduch.Microfinance beyond group lending.Economics of Transition. 2000; 8(2), 401–20.
  • C. Rooyen, R. Stewart, T. de Wet. The impact of microfinance in sub-saharanAfrica: a systematic review of the evidence. World Development. 2012;40(11), 2249–62.
  • M. Angelucci, D.S. Karlan,J. Zinman. Win some lose some Evidence from a randomized microcredit programplacement experiment by CompartamosBanco.Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). 2013, 1-68.
  • R.C. Nagaraju, V. RameshReddy. Operationissues and challenges of microfinance in India.Indian Journal of Economics and Development. 2016; 4(9), 1-4
  • F. Agbo, S. Chidebelu. Socio-economic determinants ofcooperative societies access to theservices of the nigerian agriculturalcooperative and rural developmentbank. Field Actions ScienceReports. 2010; 4, 1 – 5.
  • A simplified guide to thecooperative development policy and the cooperative societies act of Tanzania mainland.Co-operatives and Development in Tanzania. 2006, 1-24.

Abstract Views: 294

PDF Views: 166




  • Lifting the Poor in Nigeria:A Comparative Analyses of the Role of Microfinance Banks and Cooperatives

Abstract Views: 294  |  PDF Views: 166

Authors

Adeniyi Jimmy Adedokun
Department of Economics, McPherson University, Ogun State, Nigeria

Abstract


Objectives: This study investigates the role of microfinance banks (MFBs) and cooperatives in lifting the poor in Nigeria.

Methods/Statistical analysis: Analyses are carried out in relation to how accessible and effective the two institutions’ loans. The study employs survey methodology where interview is used to generate data. The interview is conducted in Ibadan, the capital of Oyo state, and Abeokuta, the capital of Ogun State in South-western part of Nigeria. In all, 166 respondents provided the information used for this study. Simple averages and percentages are used for analysis.

Findings: Findings reveal that it is difficult for the poor to access MFBs’ loans, and loan effectiveness analyses show that only middle income and rich people can benefit from MFBs’ loans.However,cooperatives’ loans are found to be more accessible and effective to the poor.

Improvements/Applications: The results of this study have important implication for poverty reduction, thereby recommends that cooperatives movement should be encouraged inNigeria.


Keywords


Microfinance Banks, Cooperatives, Comparative Analysis, The Poor, Nigeria.

References