Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Experimental Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Solid Desiccant Dehumidifier Using Silica Gel


Affiliations
1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India. 202002, India
 

Simple and Economical method to produce dehumidification is by solid desiccant wheel with a desiccant material (silica gel) which attract moisture from moist air. Experimental analysis of the working of the dehumidifier desiccant wheel is indicated in this work with actual thought to the performance deviation as a function of airflow rates at the process side and ambient temperature for hot and humid conditions. The silica gel is reactivated by an electric heater which is fixed in the reactivation portion. Flow rates of the air have been varied (that is, 2.8, 3.5, 4.5, & 5.2 m/s) at the process section of the desiccant wheel, while on the reactivation section, airflow rate is constant (i.e., 2.8m/s). At various ambient temperatures (i.e., 32, 33, 34, & 35°C) and various airflow rates, performance parameters also analyzed like Moisture Removal Capacity (MRC), Dehumidification Coefficient of Performance (DCOP), dehumidification effectiveness, and Sensible Energy Ratio (SER). We observed that the optimum values of these performance parameters in this work are obtained at 3.5m/s air velocity at the process section and 34℃ ambient temperature. Optimum values of these parameters show a decrease in energy used and improved air quality in the conditioned space.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Dai, Y.J., Wang, R.Z. and Zhang, H.F., 2001, “Parameter analysis to improve rotary desiccant dehumidification using a mathematical model”, International Journal of Thermal Science, Vol. 40, pp. 400-408
  • Sheridan, J.C. and Mitchell, J.W., 1985, “A hybrid solar desiccant cooling system”, Journal of Solar Energy, Vol. 34, pp. 187-193
  • Collier, R., Arnold, F. and Barlow, R., 1981, “An overview of open cycle desiccant cooling systems and materials”, Solar Energy Research Institute, SERI/TP-631-1065.
  • Jurinak, J.J., Mitchell, J.W. and Beckman, W.A., 1984, “Open cycle desiccant air conditioning as an alternative to vapour compression cooling in residential applications”, Journal of Solar Energy Eng., Vol. 106, pp. 252- 260.
  • Aly, S.E., Fathalah, K. and Gari, H.A., 1988, “Analysis of an integrated vapour compression and a waste heat dehumidifier A/C system”, Heat Recovery Systems & CHP, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 503-528 .
  • Yadav, Y.K. and Kaushik, S.C., 1991, “Psychrometric technoeconomic assessment and parametric studies of vapor-compression and solid/liquid desiccant hybrid solar space conditioning systems”, Heat Recovery Systems and CHP, Vol. 11, pp. 563–572.
  • Farooq, K.D. and Ruthven, D.M., 1991, “Numerical simulation of a desiccant bed for solar air heater conditioning applications”, Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 113, pp. 80–92.
  • Waugaman, D.G., Kini, A. and Kettleborough, C.F., 1993, “A review of desiccant cooling systems”, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Vol. 115(1), pp. 1–8.
  • San, J.Y. and Hsiau, S.C., 1993, “Effect of axial solid heat conduction and mass diffusion in a rotary heat and mass regenerator”, International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 2051-2059.
  • Pesaran, A.A. and Wipke, K.B., 1994, “Use of unglazed transpired solar collectors for desiccant cooling”, Solar Energy, Vol. 52, pp. 419-427.
  • Zheng, W. and Worek, W.M., 1995, “Performance optimization of rotary dehumidifiers”, Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 117, pp. 40-44.
  • Gao, Z., Mei, V.C. and Tomlinson, J.J., 2005, “Theoretical analysis of dehumidification process in a desiccant wheel”, Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 41, pp. 1033-1042.
  • Xuan, S. and Radermacher, R., 2005, “Transient simulation for desiccant and enthalpy wheels”, International Sorption Heat Pump Conference, June 22-24, 2005, Denver, CO, USA.
  • Nia, F.E., Paassen, D.V. and Saidi, M.H., 2006, “Modeling and simulation of desiccant wheel for air conditioning”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 38, pp. 1230-1239.
  • Jani, D. B., Mishra, M., & Sahoo, P. K. (2016). Performance prediction of rotary solid desiccant dehumidifier in hybrid air-conditioning system using artificial neural network. Applied Thermal Engineering, 98, 1091-1103.
  • Abbassi, Y., Baniasadi, E., & Ahmadikia, H. (2017). Comparative performance analysis of different solar desiccant dehumidification systems. Energy and Buildings, 150, 37-51.
  • Lee, Y., Park, S., & Kang, S. (2021). Performance analysis of a solid desiccant cooling system for a residential air conditioning system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 182, 116091.
  • Hussain, T., Kamal, M. A., Alam, Z., Hafiz, A., & Ahmad, A. (2021). Experimental and numerical investigation of spherical food product during forced convection cooling. Measurement: Food, 3, 100006.
  • Hussain, T., Singh, A. K., Mittal, A., Verma, A., & Alam, Z. (2020). Performance evaluation of vapor compression refrigeration system by varying air flow rates in air-cooled and evaporatively cooled condensers. International Journal of Energy for a Clean Environment, 21(1).
  • Alam, Z., & Hussain, T. (2022). Experimental Exploration on Performance Advancement of Solid Desiccant Dehumidifier. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1224(1), 012011. doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1224/1/012011.
  • Mandegari, M. A., & Pahlavanzadeh, H. (2009). Introduction of a new definition for effectiveness of desiccant wheels. Energy, 34(6), 797-803.
  • Slayzak, S. J., & Ryan, J. P. (2000). Desiccant Dehumidification Wheel Test Guide. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NERL/TP-550-26131.
  • Ge, T. S., Ziegler, F., & Wang, R. Z. (2010). A mathematical model for predicting the performance of a compound desiccant wheel (A model of compound desiccant wheel). Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(8-9), 1005-1015.
  • Angrisani, G., Minichiello, F., Roselli, C., & Sasso, M. (2011). Experimental investigation to optimise a desiccant HVAC system coupled to a small size cogenerator. Applied Thermal Engineering, 31(4), 506-512.
  • Henning, H. M., Erpenbeck, T., Hindenburg, C., & Santamaria, I. S. (2001). The potential of solar energy use in desiccant cooling cycles. International journal of Refrigeration, 24(3), 220-229.
  • Kline, S. J. (1953). Describing uncertainty in single sample experiments. Mech. Engineering, 75, 3-8.
  • Angrisani, G., Minichiello, F., Roselli, C., & Sasso, M. (2012). Experimental analysis on the dehumidification and thermal performance of a desiccant wheel. Applied Energy, 92, 563-572.
  • Yadav A (2012) PhD. thesis, NIT Kurukshetra, India

Abstract Views: 142

PDF Views: 88




  • Experimental Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Solid Desiccant Dehumidifier Using Silica Gel

Abstract Views: 142  |  PDF Views: 88

Authors

Zafar Alam
Mechanical Engineering Department, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India. 202002, India
Taliv Hussain
Mechanical Engineering Department, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India. 202002, India

Abstract


Simple and Economical method to produce dehumidification is by solid desiccant wheel with a desiccant material (silica gel) which attract moisture from moist air. Experimental analysis of the working of the dehumidifier desiccant wheel is indicated in this work with actual thought to the performance deviation as a function of airflow rates at the process side and ambient temperature for hot and humid conditions. The silica gel is reactivated by an electric heater which is fixed in the reactivation portion. Flow rates of the air have been varied (that is, 2.8, 3.5, 4.5, & 5.2 m/s) at the process section of the desiccant wheel, while on the reactivation section, airflow rate is constant (i.e., 2.8m/s). At various ambient temperatures (i.e., 32, 33, 34, & 35°C) and various airflow rates, performance parameters also analyzed like Moisture Removal Capacity (MRC), Dehumidification Coefficient of Performance (DCOP), dehumidification effectiveness, and Sensible Energy Ratio (SER). We observed that the optimum values of these performance parameters in this work are obtained at 3.5m/s air velocity at the process section and 34℃ ambient temperature. Optimum values of these parameters show a decrease in energy used and improved air quality in the conditioned space.

References