Corporate Governance Insight

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

From 'In Control' to 'In Action' Exploring Board Roles Within the 21st Century Corporation


Affiliations
1 Emeritus Professor of Corporate Governance and Institutions and Founding-Dean University College Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands ., India
 

The 21st century global systems dynamics calls for a new perspective on corporate governance as the current ‘in control’ is ineffective, precisely because of the impossibility of control in a complex world of uncertainty. Thus, the new actionable perspective on 21st boards is focused on balancing exploitation and exploration. Exploitation in the boardroom enhances (soft) control in the embedded corporate network, through active cooperation, pro-­ ‐social behavior and principles of reciprocity. It simplifies decision making in a complex world, particularly in a context of many stakeholders. Exploration in the boardroom is aimed at absorption of the complexity, through sharing decision making authority in networks, the stimulation of search behavior and allowing for multiple private and social objectives. The board acts as an important facilitator of the learning capabilities of the organization and the reconfiguration of processes and structures.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Control, Board, New Approach to Corporate Governance
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58-107.DOI: 10.1257/jel.48.1.58

  • Arthur, W.B, 1991, Complexity and the Economy, Oxford.

  • Bankowits , M., Aberg , C, and Teuchert, C. 2016. Digitalization and boards of directors: A New Area or corporate governance? Business and Management Research, 5(2), 58-­ ‐69. DOI:10.5430/bmr.v5n2p58

  • Blair, M.M., 2004, Ownership and control: Rethinking corporate governance for the twenty- first century, In: Clarke, T. (2004) Theories of corporate governance: The philosophical foundations of corporate governance, Routledge, London, 174-188.

  • Blair, M.M. and Stout, L.A., 1999, A team production theory of corporate law, Virginia Law Review, 85(2), 247-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/1073662

  • Bovie, S., 2016, Are boards designed to fail ? The implausibility of effective board monitoring, Academy of Management Annals, 6520, 1-­ ‐93. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1120957

  • Bridoux, F. and Stoelhorst, J.W, 2014, Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives, Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 107-­ ‐125.

  • https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2089

  • Daily, C.M., Dalton, D.R. and Canella, A.A., 2003 Special topic forum on corporate governance: Corporate governance: decades of dialogue and data (introduction to special issue), Academy of Management Review, 28 (3), 371-­ ‐ 382. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196703

  • Davis, G., 2016, Can an economy survive without corporations? Technology and robust organizational alternatives. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0067

  • Fiske, A. P.,1991, Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations,

  • Free Press, New York.

  • Guillen, M. F. and Ontiveros, E., 2016, Global turning points. Understanding the challenges for business in the 21st Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

  • Hayek, F.H. 1949, Individualism and Economic Order, London (1967).

  • Hillman, A.J., 2014, Board diversity: beginning to unpeel the onion, Corporate Governance: An International Review, doi:10.1111/corg.12090.

  • Hoogduin, L.H. 1991, Some aspects of uncertainty and the theory of a monetary economy, Ph.D thesis University of Groningen, Groningen .

  • Huse, M. 2009, The Value Creating Board, Routledge, New York.

  • Huse, M and Gabrielsson, J., 2012, Board leadership and value creation: An extended team production approach, Handbook of Corporate Governance, SAGE, London.

  • Huse, M., & Solberg, A. G. (2006). Gender-related boardroom dynamics: How Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113–130.

  • Jensen M. C. and Meckling W. H., 1976, Theory of the firm: Mana-­ ‐ gerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 2: 305–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304405X(76)90026-X

  • Johnson, J. L., Daily, C. M. and Ellstrand, A. E. , 1996, Boards of directors: A review and research agenda, Journal of Management, 22, 409–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200303

  • Mace, M. , 1971, Directors: Myth and Reality. Harvard University, Boston.

  • March, J.G., 1991, Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, Organization Science, 2(1), 71-­ ‐78. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71

  • McNulty, T. and Pettigrew, A., 1999, Strategists on the board, Organization Studies, 20, 40–74.

  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699201003

  • McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., and Douglas, T., 2013, Developing corporate governance research through qualitative methods: A review of previous studies, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183-­ ‐198. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12006

  • Oehmichen, J., Heyden, M., Georgakakis, L.M. and Volberda, H.W., 2017, Boards of directors and organizational ambidexterity in knowledge-­ ‐intensive firms, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 283-­ ‐306. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1244904

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. ,1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, Harper and Row, New York

  • Pirson,T. and Turnbull, S., 2012.Complexitytheory ,CSR , and corporate governance -­‐ the need for alternative governance models , Humanistic Management research paper 14/04.

  • Pugliese , A., Bezemer, P., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, H. and Volberda, H.W., 2009.

  • Boards of directors' contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17 (3), 292-­ ‐306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678683.2009.00740.x

  • Pugliese, A., Nicholson, G., & Bezemer, P.-­ ‐J., 2015, An observational analysis of the impact of board dynamics and directors' participation on perceived board effectiveness.

  • British Journal of Management, 26(1), 1-­ ‐25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12074

  • Rajan, R.G. and Zingales, L., 1998, Power in a theory of the firm, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555630

  • Ravasi and Zattoni, A. 2006, Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of

  • mixed-­ ‐ownership institutions, Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1671-­ ‐1702.

  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00659.x

  • Raworth, K., 2017, Doughnut economics: seven ways to think like a 21st-­ ‐century economist,

  • Chelseagreenpublishing, White River Junction.

  • Teece, DJ., Pisano , G. and Shuen, A., 1997, Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic

  • Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 7, 509-­ ‐533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

  • Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J. Huse, M., 2009, Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate

  • governance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17, 3, 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x

  • Veltrop, D.E., Molleman, E., Hooghiemstra, R.B. and Van Ees, H. 2017, Who’s the Boss at the Top?

  • A Micro-Level Analysis of Director Expertise, Status and Conformity Within Boards, Journal of

  • Management Studies, 10.1111/joms.12276. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12276

  • Von Mises, L., 2012, Human Action, New Haven

  • Westphal, J.D. and Zajac, E.J., 2013, A behavioral theory of corporate governance: explicating the

  • mechanisms of socially situated and socially constituted agency. The Academy of Management

  • Annals , 7 (1), 607-­ ‐661. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2013.783669

  • Wincent, J., Anokhin, K., Örtqvist, D., 2015, Supporting innovation in government-sponsored networks:

  • The role of network board composition, International Small Business Journal, 31(8), 997–1020.

  • https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242612447970

  • Yoshikawa, T. and Hu, H.W., 2015, Organizational citizenship behaviors of directors: An integrated

  • framework of director role identity and boardroom structure, Journal of Business Ethics.

  • https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2808-9

  • Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A., 1989, Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review

  • and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15, 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208


Abstract Views: 95

PDF Views: 70




  • From 'In Control' to 'In Action' Exploring Board Roles Within the 21st Century Corporation

Abstract Views: 95  |  PDF Views: 70

Authors

Hans Van Ees
Emeritus Professor of Corporate Governance and Institutions and Founding-Dean University College Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands ., India

Abstract


The 21st century global systems dynamics calls for a new perspective on corporate governance as the current ‘in control’ is ineffective, precisely because of the impossibility of control in a complex world of uncertainty. Thus, the new actionable perspective on 21st boards is focused on balancing exploitation and exploration. Exploitation in the boardroom enhances (soft) control in the embedded corporate network, through active cooperation, pro-­ ‐social behavior and principles of reciprocity. It simplifies decision making in a complex world, particularly in a context of many stakeholders. Exploration in the boardroom is aimed at absorption of the complexity, through sharing decision making authority in networks, the stimulation of search behavior and allowing for multiple private and social objectives. The board acts as an important facilitator of the learning capabilities of the organization and the reconfiguration of processes and structures.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Control, Board, New Approach to Corporate Governance

References