Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Anand, G.
- Genotype x Environment Interaction and Stability Analysis for Fruit Yield and Quality Traits in Pineapple (Ananas comosus)
Abstract Views :214 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Thirupathisaram (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Fruits, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Periyakulam (T.N.), IN
1 ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Thirupathisaram (T.N.), IN
2 Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai (T.N.), IN
3 Department of Fruits, Horticultural College and Research Institute, Periyakulam (T.N.), IN
Source
The Asian Journal of Horticulture, Vol 12, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 79-83Abstract
The present study was conducted to assess the existence of genotype × environmental (G × E) interactions and stability for yield and quality related traits in pineapple using four varieties over seven locations during the year 2012-13. Pooled analysis of variance over seven locations revealed that the genotypic variances were highly significant for all the characters which revealed considerable genetic variability in the population. Stability parameters revealed that the genotype 'Amritha' was found better under poor environments. 'Mauritius' and 'Amritha' showed stable and consistent performance for all quantitative and qualitative traits whereas, 'Mauritius' had above average response and high stability in better environments for yield only. Thus, genotypes 'Amritha' and 'Mauritius' may be utilized in hybrid breeding programme to exploit their consistent performance in all order of yield.Keywords
Genotype x Environment Interaction, Stability, Quality, Yield.
References
- Eberhart, S.A. and Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci., 6: 24-40.
- Finlay, K.W. and Wilkinson, G.N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation for plant breeding programme. Australian J. Agric. Res., 14: 742-754.
- Govaerts R., Frodin, D. G. and Radcliffe-Smith, A. (2000). World checklist and bibliography of Euphorbiaceae (with Pandaceae). Redwood Books Limited, Trowbridge, Wiltshire.
- Joshi, H.J. Mehta, D.R. and Jadon, B.S. (2002). Genotype and environment interaction for yield and yield components in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Adv. Plant Sci., 15(1): 261-266.
- Kumari, T. R., Subramanyam, D. and Sreedhar, N. (2003). Stability analysis in castor (Ricinus communis L.). Crop Research (Hisar), 25: 96-102.
- Manivel, P. and Hussain, H.S. J. (2001). Genotype × environment interaction in castor. Madras Agric. J., 87(7/9): 394-397.
- Murthy, K.G. K., Reddy, A.V., Balakishan, G. and Reddy, M. B. (2003). Influence of environment on sex expression in castor (Ricinus communis L.). J. Oilseeds Res., 20(2): 225-228.
- Sodavadiya, P.R. and Dhaduk, L.K. (2011). Genotype xenvironment interaction and stability analysis in castor (Ricinus communis L.). J. Oilseeds Res., 28(1): 74-76.
- Solanki, S.S. and Joshi, P. (2000). Stability parameter for sex expression in castor (Ricinus communis L.) J. Oilseeds Res., 17(2): 242-248.
- Thakkar, D.A., Gami, R.A. and Patel, P.S. (2010). GxE and stability studies on castor hybrids for yield and its attributing characters. J. Oilseeds Res., 27: 74-77.