Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Training Need Assesment of Members of Farmer Producer Organisation and Producer Companies in India with Reference to Pune District


Affiliations
1 JDA office Pune, Department of Agriculture, India
 

The intervention and role of farmer producer organizations has been acknowledged as crucial for upliftment of agrarian community who are facing various challenges such as decreased land holdings, globalization, unpredictable weather conditions due to global warming, less value realization of agro produce to name a few. Inspite of the government vision for these producer companies are in many places observed to be struggling. The sustainability and business viability of these producer companies are in doubt and hence it is believed that training intervention shall help them to overcome these problems by offering certain training interventions. This study is an attempt to identify the training needs and gaps in the existing training modules. It is observed that though the respondents have expressed their satisfaction regarding training intervention in areas such as post harvest technology and market led extension but at the same time the respondent training needs for productivity enhancement, socio economic sustainability, linkages, compliances and monitoring cannot be ignored and needs to be addressed. Further as revealed by the study more than the demographic attributes prior training experiences exert an influence on the training assessment and hence need to be considered while designing the appropriate training moduls.

Keywords

Farmers, Agriculture, Productivity, FPCs, Climate.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adhiguru, P. P. (2009). “Strengthening Pluralistic Agricultural Information Delivery Systems in India.” . Agricultural Economics Research Review, 71-79.
  • Alvarez, J. a. (2006.). “Adoption of Computer Based Information Systems: The Case of Dairy Farmers in Canterbury . Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48-60.
  • Batte, B. R. (1993). Identifying Needs and Audiences in Farm Management Outrech Education. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy.
  • Chauhan, N. M. (2012). Assessment of Training Needs of members of Tribal Women SHG for Agricultural Development. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education , 193-198.
  • Llewellyn, R. S. (2007). “Information Quality and Effectiveness for More Rapid Adoption Decisions by Farmers. Field Crops Research, 148-156.
  • Llewellyn, R. S. (2007. ). “Information Quality and Effectiveness for More Rapid Adoption Decisions by Farmers.”. Field Crops Research, 148-156.
  • M., T. (2011). A Framework for Linking Small Farmers to Markets. New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture (p. 41). IFAD.
  • Ngathou, I. N. (2006). Managing Agricultural Risk: Examining Information Sources Preferred by Limited Resource Farmers. Journal of Extension, n 44(6).
  • Onumah G., D. J. (2007). Empowering Smallholder Farmers in Markets: Changing agricultural marketing systems and innovative responses by producer organizations. ESFIM, 38.
  • S. BARMAN, K. P. (2013). Training need of Tribal Farmers in Raqpeseed Production Technology of Upper Brahmaputra Valley Zone of Assam. 686-689.
  • Sajeev and Singh, A. (2010). Capacity Building through KVK,tRAINING nEEDS ANALYSIS OF FARMERS OF aRUNACHAL pRADESH, iNDIA. Indian Resource Journal of Extn.l Education, 8390.
  • Schnitkey, G. M. (1992). Information Preferences of Ohio Commercial Farmers: Implications for Extension. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 486-497.
  • Solano, C. H. (2003). “The Role of Personal Information Sources on the Decision Making Process of Costa Rican Dairy Farmers. Agricultural Systems, 3-18.
  • Solano, C. H. (2003). “The Role of Personal Information Sources on the Decision Making Process of Costa Rican Dairy Farmers.” . Agricultural Systems, 3-18.
  • Stiglitz, J. 2. (2000). “The Contributions of the Economics of Information to Twentieth Century Economics. Quarterly , 1441-1478.
  • Sukhpal Singh, T. S. (2013). Producer Companies in India:A study of organisation and performance. Ahmedabad: Centre for Management in Agriculture.
  • Trebbin, A. (2014). Linking Small farmers to modern retail through Producer OrganisationsExperiences with producer companies in India. Food Policy, 35-44.
  • Trebbin, A., & Hassier, M. (2014). farmers Producer Comapnies in India: a new concept for collective action? Journal of Economics, 35-53.
  • Tucker, M. a. (2002). “Preferred Sources and Channels of Soil and Water Conservation Information among Farmers in Three Midwestern US Watersheds.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 297-313.
  • Waller, B. E. (1998). “Matching Innovations with Potential Users: A Case Study of Potato IPM Practices.” Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 203-215.

Abstract Views: 231

PDF Views: 76




  • Training Need Assesment of Members of Farmer Producer Organisation and Producer Companies in India with Reference to Pune District

Abstract Views: 231  |  PDF Views: 76

Authors

Preeti Sawairam
JDA office Pune, Department of Agriculture, India

Abstract


The intervention and role of farmer producer organizations has been acknowledged as crucial for upliftment of agrarian community who are facing various challenges such as decreased land holdings, globalization, unpredictable weather conditions due to global warming, less value realization of agro produce to name a few. Inspite of the government vision for these producer companies are in many places observed to be struggling. The sustainability and business viability of these producer companies are in doubt and hence it is believed that training intervention shall help them to overcome these problems by offering certain training interventions. This study is an attempt to identify the training needs and gaps in the existing training modules. It is observed that though the respondents have expressed their satisfaction regarding training intervention in areas such as post harvest technology and market led extension but at the same time the respondent training needs for productivity enhancement, socio economic sustainability, linkages, compliances and monitoring cannot be ignored and needs to be addressed. Further as revealed by the study more than the demographic attributes prior training experiences exert an influence on the training assessment and hence need to be considered while designing the appropriate training moduls.

Keywords


Farmers, Agriculture, Productivity, FPCs, Climate.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21904/weken%2F2016%2Fv1%2Fi3%2F103461