Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Gender, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Workplace Incivility


Affiliations
1 Department of Management,Pondicherry University, Karaikal Campus, India
 

Workplace incivility is a relatively new area of research within organizational psychology, and much of the research to date has focused on targets of incivility at work. Workplace incivility has been defined as low-level, ambiguous, negative behaviors which are rude and discourteous and display a lack of regard for others. Individuals who frequently encounter workplace incivility may also experience a number of negative psychological and somatic outcomes, including but not limited to impaired concentration and productivity decline, increased absenteeism. Incivility, also referred to as bullying, emotional abuse, and mobbing, has increasingly become an issue in today's workplace.The purpose of the present study was to examine perceptions of workplace incivility as a function of observers' gender, observers' gender-related attitudes, and the gender of the instigator and target of the mistreatment. The study included data from 102 (65% female, 90% male) participants from various occupations and backgrounds across the Pondicherry region. Participants completed a web-based survey that consisted of scenarios of uncivil interactions, gender-attitudes, and various demographic information. Results suggest that observers' gender and gender-related attitudes are important factors in how they perceive workplace incivility. Results also suggest that the gender of those involved in uncivil interactions is less influential.

Keywords

Workplace Incivility, Organizational Psychology, Productivity, Bullying, Emotional Abuse.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21, 1141-1158.
  • Aguinis, H. & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat: The spiraling effect of incivilityin the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452-471.
  • Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994) Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173-184.
  • Cortina, L., Magley, V., Williams, J., & Langhout, R. (2001). Incivility in the workplace:incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64-80.
  • Crowne, D. P. and Marlowe, D. (1960), “A New Scale of Social Desirability Independentof Psychopathology,” Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
  • Dietz-Uhler, B., & Murrell, A. (1992). College students’ perceptions of sexualharassment: Are gender differences decreasing? Journal of College Student Development, 33, 540- 546.

Abstract Views: 259

PDF Views: 91




  • Gender, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Workplace Incivility

Abstract Views: 259  |  PDF Views: 91

Authors

C. Madhavaiah
Department of Management,Pondicherry University, Karaikal Campus, India

Abstract


Workplace incivility is a relatively new area of research within organizational psychology, and much of the research to date has focused on targets of incivility at work. Workplace incivility has been defined as low-level, ambiguous, negative behaviors which are rude and discourteous and display a lack of regard for others. Individuals who frequently encounter workplace incivility may also experience a number of negative psychological and somatic outcomes, including but not limited to impaired concentration and productivity decline, increased absenteeism. Incivility, also referred to as bullying, emotional abuse, and mobbing, has increasingly become an issue in today's workplace.The purpose of the present study was to examine perceptions of workplace incivility as a function of observers' gender, observers' gender-related attitudes, and the gender of the instigator and target of the mistreatment. The study included data from 102 (65% female, 90% male) participants from various occupations and backgrounds across the Pondicherry region. Participants completed a web-based survey that consisted of scenarios of uncivil interactions, gender-attitudes, and various demographic information. Results suggest that observers' gender and gender-related attitudes are important factors in how they perceive workplace incivility. Results also suggest that the gender of those involved in uncivil interactions is less influential.

Keywords


Workplace Incivility, Organizational Psychology, Productivity, Bullying, Emotional Abuse.

References