A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Choudhary, Anirudh
- Management of Dodder in Lucerne for better Forage Quality
Authors
1 College of Agriculture, Sumerpur, Pali (Rajasthan), IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 11, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 79-82Abstract
Forage crops include a wide range of annual and perennial grasses and legumes grown for hay, silage and pasture and are grown throughout the country to support various livestock. Weeds can reduce the quantity and quality of desirable plants in pastures and hayfields. Even some weed species can also be poisonous to livestock. Therefore, weed management is an imperative component of forage crops and pasture management particularly for parasitic weeds. Well-managed pastures require fewer direct actions to manage weeds because healthy, well-established forage plants are more likely to prevent weed invasions. In some situations, however, herbicides are needed for weed control despite a producer’s best pasture management efforts. Under some circumstances, the quality of pastures can be substantially improved with a well-planned herbicide programme. Therefore, parasitic weed management requires a combination of cultural, mechanical, biological, and chemical methods starting from field preparation and continues throughout the life of the pasture along with prevention strategies. The weed management techniques are often species-specific, under such circumstances the success of weed management is depends on correctly identification of weeds present in the field. In order to make sound management decisions, it is important to know the name of a weed, as well as its lifecycle and reproductive mode and capacity. Accurate information on the biology and lifecycle of the weeds can help growers to apply weed management techniques more effectively, based on the susceptibility of the species to different control methods.
Keywords
Cuscuta, Lucerne, Damage, Botany, Integrated weed management.- RUDSETI:A Perfect Avenue for Entrepreneurial Training in Agriculture and Allied Fields for Rural Youth
Authors
1 Department of Agriculture Economics, Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), IN
2 Agri-Business Division, NAARM, Hyderabad (Telangana), IN
3 Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 12, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 30-33Abstract
Indian economy is at the tipping point and youth of the country will determine the direction the economy takes. India enjoys a demographic dividend where more than 50 per cent of its population comes under working age group of 15 to 59 years which offers an economic opportunity to be utilized for fast tracking India’s economic growth and development. According to Census Survey of India (conducted in 2011) the current proportion of population under 25 years of age is 51 per cent and proportion under 35 years is 66 per cent. In India youth constitute 27.5 per cent of the population who are aged between 15 years to 29 years which contribute 34 per cent in India’s Gross National Income (National Youth Policy, 2014). Comparatively China’s current economic boom is said to be the direct consequence of the large proportion of youth in its population. With proper education, job openings and health care, our youth are sure to tip the economy in the right direction. Despite of demographic dividend and increased literacy among youth, unemployment is the biggest challenge the country’s youth is facing mainly because of lack of any form of social security system as well as proper and adequate avenues for vocational training.- Impact of Crop Rotation on Weed Management
Authors
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Sumerpur, Pali (Rajasthan), IN
2 Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), IN
3 College of Agriculture, Sumerpur, Pali (Rajasthan), IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 12, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 68-69Abstract
The agriculture aimed at meeting the needs of present generation without endangering the resource base of future generation. The change from a high input and chemically intensive agriculture to a sustainable form to control weeds relies on use of low or non-monetary inputs like selection of crops and their variety, balanced nutrition, crop geometry, tillage practices, crop rotation etc. The power for investment on costly and hazardous inputs like weedicides without considering threshold levels is increasing day by day in want of higher crop production. Weedicides are also applied from field preparation to harvesting and post harvesting caused a considerable improvement in but damaged drastically the resources like soil health, crop environment, microbiota etc. and threatened by developing resistance against them. Under such circumstances, crop rotation, a part of agronomical management changes micro climate in favour of crop. The use of less persistence and highly effective herbicides either shift the weed flora or cause resistance to herbicides and endangered some crop species and damaged bio-diversity.- Problem and Prospects of Dairy Industry in India
Authors
1 College of Agriculture, Agriculture University, Jodhpur (Rajasthan), IN
2 National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad (Telangana), IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 12, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 83-86Abstract
India ranks topmost in milk production with a total production of 127.9 MT milk (BAHS, 2013). Contribution to milk production by buffalo, cow and goat in 2010-11 was 51%, 45% and 4%, respectively. India reached to this stage in milk production because of several reasons including crossbreeding, artificial insemination, operation flood etc. However, in comparison to other milk producing countries of world, individual productivity of our dairy animal is very low. Average milk productivity of buffalo and indigenous cow in India is 4.58 and 2.2 kg/day, respectively. India became largest milk producing country due to the efforts of millions of small holder producers and several other policy matters. Therefore, in India dairying is still a part of rural life instead of industry.- Utilization of Landraces and Local Cultivars of Dominant Crops for Germplasm Conservation
Authors
1 Agricultural Research Sub Station (A.U.), Sumerpur (Rajasthan), IN
2 College of Agriculture, (A.U.), Sumerpur (Rajasthan), IN
Source
Rashtriya Krishi (English), Vol 13, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 91-94Abstract
The attitude toward landraces has been changing in recent years, as improved cultivars have not always proved to be superior, for example in marginal environments or under specific socio-economic conditions (Weltzien et al., 1998 and Ceccarelli et al., 1992). Landraces are sometimes also preferred by farmers for quality aspects (Dhamotharan et al., 1997). Thus, a new interest has arisen to use traditional landraces as such, or in breeding programmes for further enhancement.References
- Ceccarelli, S., Valkoun, J., Erskine, W., Weigand, S., Miller, R. and Van Leur, J.A.G. (1992). Plant genetic resources and plant improvement as tools to develop sustainable agriculture. Exp. Agric., 28 : 89-98.
- Christinck, A., Kshirsagar, K.G.,VomBrocke, K., Weltzien, E. R. and Bramel-Cox, P. (1998). Report to NBPGR: Collection of pearl millet landraces in Rajasthan. ICRISAT/NBPGR/GTZ/ University of Hohenheim collaborative project: Enhancing quality, diversity, and productivity of pearl millet genetic resources in Rajasthan, India.
- Dhamotharan, M., Weltzien, E.R., Whitaker, M.L., Rattunde, H.W.F., Anders, M.M.,Tiagi, L.C., Manga, V.K. and Vyas, K.L. (1997). Seed management strategies of farmers in western Rajasthan in their social and environmental contexts: results from a workshop using new communication techniques for a dialogue between farmers and scientists. 5-8 February 1996, Digadi village, Jodhpur district, Rajasthan, India. Integrated Systems Project Progress Report no. 9. ICRISAT Patancheru 502324, Andhra Pradesh, India.
- Marshall, D.R. and Brown, A.H.D. (1975). Optimum sampling strategies in genetic conservation. pp. 53-80 In: Crop genetic resources today and tomorrow (O.H. Frankel and J.G. Hawkes, eds.). Cambridge University Press.
- Marshall, D.R. (1990). Crop genetic resources: Current and emerging issues. pp. 367-388 In: Plant population genetics, breeding and genetic resources (A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg, A.L. Kahler and B.S. Weir, eds.). Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland.
- Schönhuth, M. and Kievelitz, U. (1994). Participatory learning approaches - rapid rural appraisal, participatory appraisal. An introductory guide. Deutsche Gesellschaftfür Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) (ed.). TZ-Verlagsgesellschaft, Rossdorf/Germany.
- Weltzien R.E.,Whitaker, M.L., Rattunde, H.F.W., Dhamotharan, M. and Anders, M.M. (1998). Participatory Approaches in Pearl Millet Breeding. pp. 143-171 In: Seeds of choice making the most of new varieties for small farmers (J.R. Witcombe, D.S. Virk and J. Farrington, eds.). Oxford and IBH Publishers, New Delhi.
- Witcombe, J.R. and Gilani, M.M. (1979). Variation in cereals from the Himalayas and the optimum strategy for sampling germplasm. J. Appl. Ecol., 16 : 633-640.