Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Administered by Dermatomal Stimulation Versus Acupuncture Points Stimulation


Affiliations
1 Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
 

Background and Aims: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological method based on gate theory of pain control and provides analgesia noninvasively. Application of TENS requires simple training and can be self administered by patients without any l potential for toxicity. Patients can titrate the dosage on and whenever needed. TENS can be administered by either dermatomal stimulation or by stimulation of acupuncture points for labour analgesia. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of TENS administered by dermatomal stimulation with TENS administered by stimulation of acupuncture points.

Materials and Method: The study was conducted on 40 ASA grade 1 parturients with 37 to 42 weeks gestation in active stage without any fetal or maternal complication. Parturients were randomly allocated by computer generated random number table to one of two groups (Group D- TENS by dematomal stimulation, Group A- TENS by acupuncture points stimulation) comprising of 20 parturients each. Each group was monitored for pain scores, progress of labour and maternal and fetal outcome. The quantitative parameters were analysed using the Student-t test and Mann Whitney test. Qualitative parameters were analysed using Chi-square test/Fisher Exact test. A p value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: TENS administered by dermatomal stimulation causes significant decrease in VAS score and rescue analgesic requirement as compared to acupuncture point stimulation. Parturients in Group D also reported significant decrease of back pain and better ambulation as compared to Group A. Maternal and fetal outcome were similar in both groups without any side effects.

Conclusion: Pain relief in labour is better when TENS is administered by dermatomal stimulation as compared to acupuncture point stimulation.


Keywords

Acupuncture Analgesia, Obstetric Analgesia, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Wang SM, Kain ZN, White P. Acupuncture analgesia: П. Clinical Considerations. Anesth Analg 2008;108:611–21.
  • Chao AS, Chao A, Wang TH, Chang YC, Peng HH, Chang SD, et al. Pain relief by applying Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on acupuncture points during first stage of labour: A randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. Pain 2007;127:214–20.
  • Dowsell T, Bedwll C, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD007214.
  • Available from: https://www.tenscare.co.uk/maternity/mamatens
  • Ratna T, Rekha P. Comparative study of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) and tramadol hydrochloride for pain relief in labour. J Obstet Gynecol Ind 2004;54:346–50.
  • Farragher RA, Kodali BS. Obstetric anesthesia. In: Wylie and Churchill-Davidson’s A practice of Anesthesia. Healy TJ, Knight PR, editors. 7th ed. London: Arnold Press; 2009. p. 923–36.
  • Carroll D, Tramer M, McQuay H, Nye B, Moore A. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in labour pain: A systemic review. BJOG 1997;104:169–75.
  • Harrison RF, Woods T, Shore M, Mathews G, Unwin A. Pain relief in labour using Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS). A TENS/TENS placebo controlled in two parity groups. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 1986;93:739–46.
  • Pandole A, Kore SJ, Nemade Y, Kamat S, Ambiye VR. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for labour analgesia. Bombay Hospital Journal 2004;46(2):127–30.
  • Mackenzie IZ, Xu J, Cusik C, Midwinter-Morten H, Meacher H, Mollison J, et al. Acupuncture for pain relief during induced labour in nulliparae: A randomised controlled study. BJOG 2011;118:440–7.
  • Borup L, Wurlitzer W, Hedegaard M, Kesmodel US, Hvidman L. Acupuncture as pain relief during delivery: A randomized controlled trial. Birth 2009;36:5–12.
  • Peng T, Li XT, Zhou SF, Xiong Y, Kang Y, Cheng HD. Trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on acupoints relieves pain: A non-randomized controlled study. Chin J Integr Med 2010;16(3):234–8.
  • Ma W, Bai W, Lin C, Zhou P. Effects of Sanyinjiao (SP6) with electroacupuncture on labour pain in women during labour. Complement Ther Med 2011;19(1):13–8.
  • Ma WZ, Zhou PJ, Zhang Y, Yuan Y. Clinical observation on the effect of electroacupuncture of Sanyinjiao (SP 6) on labour. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 2010;35:217–21.
  • Hjelmstedt A, Shenoy ST, Stener-Victorin E, Lekander M. Acupressure to reduce labour pain: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:1453–9.
  • Thomas IL, Tyle V, Webster J, Neilson A. An evaluation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for pain relief in labour. Aust NZ J O Gynaecol 1988;28:182–9.
  • Dutta DC. Textbook of obstetrics including perinatology. 6th ed. Calcutta: New Central Book agency; 2004.
  • Hawkins JL. Epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1503–10.
  • Nageotte M, Larson D, Rumney PJ, Sidhu M, Hollenbach K. Epidural analgesia compared with combined spinal-epidural analgesia during labour in nulliparous women. The New England Journal of Medicine 1997;337:1715–9.
  • Bundsen P, Ericson K, Peterson LE, Thiringer K. Pain relief in labour by Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol.

Abstract Views: 270

PDF Views: 85




  • Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Administered by Dermatomal Stimulation Versus Acupuncture Points Stimulation

Abstract Views: 270  |  PDF Views: 85

Authors

Kirti N. Saxena
Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
Sunil Shokeen
Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India
Bharti Taneja
Maulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Background and Aims: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological method based on gate theory of pain control and provides analgesia noninvasively. Application of TENS requires simple training and can be self administered by patients without any l potential for toxicity. Patients can titrate the dosage on and whenever needed. TENS can be administered by either dermatomal stimulation or by stimulation of acupuncture points for labour analgesia. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of TENS administered by dermatomal stimulation with TENS administered by stimulation of acupuncture points.

Materials and Method: The study was conducted on 40 ASA grade 1 parturients with 37 to 42 weeks gestation in active stage without any fetal or maternal complication. Parturients were randomly allocated by computer generated random number table to one of two groups (Group D- TENS by dematomal stimulation, Group A- TENS by acupuncture points stimulation) comprising of 20 parturients each. Each group was monitored for pain scores, progress of labour and maternal and fetal outcome. The quantitative parameters were analysed using the Student-t test and Mann Whitney test. Qualitative parameters were analysed using Chi-square test/Fisher Exact test. A p value of <0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Results: TENS administered by dermatomal stimulation causes significant decrease in VAS score and rescue analgesic requirement as compared to acupuncture point stimulation. Parturients in Group D also reported significant decrease of back pain and better ambulation as compared to Group A. Maternal and fetal outcome were similar in both groups without any side effects.

Conclusion: Pain relief in labour is better when TENS is administered by dermatomal stimulation as compared to acupuncture point stimulation.


Keywords


Acupuncture Analgesia, Obstetric Analgesia, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

References