Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kathaley, Manasi H.
- A Study Evaluation of Tubal Factors of Infertility by Hysterosalpingography and Diagnostic Laparoscopy
Abstract Views :367 |
PDF Views:95
Authors
Affiliations
1 P. G. Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MVP’S Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College and Research Centre, Adgaon, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MVP’S Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College and Research Centre, Adgaon, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
1 P. G. Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MVP’S Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College and Research Centre, Adgaon, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MVP’S Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College and Research Centre, Adgaon, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 3, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 11–17Abstract
Background: Reproductive endocrinologist, consider a couple to be infertile if the couple has not conceived after 12 months of contraceptive free intercourse if the female is under the age of 34 years. The incidence of infertility in any community varies between 10-15 %. Tubal occlusion is one of the most frequent causes of infertility in women (20-40 %). The evaluation of the fallopian tube is necessary to determine the management plan for infertility. The two most diagnostic procedures which are used for the evaluation of tubal patency are hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy1. Aims of this study were: To study the validity of hysterosalpingography, in detecting tubal factors in infertility, as compared to diagnostic laparoscopy. Material and Method: This descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in a tertiary health care center attached to a Medical College. A total number of 114 primary as well as secondary infertility patients were evaluated for tubal factors of infertility. All the infertility cases underwent HSG on day 8th, 9th and 10th day of the menstrual cycles. Laparoscopic chromopertubation was done during proliferative phase of the next menstrual cycle. Statistical analysis was done using statistical package for social sciences ver.18. The result was expressed in mean and standard deviation. "Z" test for the difference between the two means were used. For qualitative data proportion and "Chi" test were used. For assessing the validity of HSG in diagnosing in tubal factors of infertility laparoscopy was used as a gold standard. For the purpose of this study, 95% confidence limit was chosen and corresponding p-value <0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Conclusion: In our study we found that Hysterosalpingography is simple, inexpensive, safe and rapid diagnostic modality for tubal patency then laparoscopy. Laparoscopy is considered the Gold Standard for diagnosing tubal and peritoneal disease. HSG and Laparoscopy are not alternative, but complimentary methods in the examination of tubal patency in case of infertility.Keywords
Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy, Tubal Factors.References
- Padubidri VG, Daftary SN. Shaw’s Text Book of Gynecology, 14th edition, Reed Elsevier India pvt- Ltd; 198.
- Fritz MA, Speroff L. Clinical Gynecology Endocrinology and Infertility, 8th edition, chapter 27; 1137.
- Berek JS, Rinehart RD, Hillard PA, Adashi EY. Novak’s Gynecology, 15th edition, Walters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd, chapter 32; 1139.
- Dutta DC. Text Book of Gynecology, 6th edition, New Central Book Agency pvt Ltd. Chapter 10; 136 – 7.
- Lakhkar BN. Radiological Procedures a Guidline 2nd Edition, Arya Publications Pvt. Ltd. Chapter 12; 131–5.
- Rock JA, Jones HW. TeLinde’s Operative Gynecology, 10th edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilikins, chapter 17; 319.
- Goynumer G, Yetim G, Gokcen O et al. Hysterosalpingography, Laparoscopy or both in the Diagnosis of Tubal Disease in Infertility. World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery, 2008 May-Aug; 1(2):23–6.
- Foroonzanford F, Sadat Z. Diagnostic Value of Hysterosalpingography and Laparoscopy for tubal patency in infertile women. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2013; 2(2):188– 92.
- Neerja JK et al. Comparitive Status of Hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in evaluation of Infertile Women. Journal of Advance Research in Biological Sciences. 2012; 4(10):41– 3.
- Heis M, Amarin Z et al. Uterine and Tubal anatomical abnormalities in infertile women: diagnosis with routine hysterosalpingography prior to selective laparoscopy. SA Journal of Radiology. 2011 Dec; 121–2.
- Mol BWJ, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F et al. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome. Human Reproduction. 1999; 14(5):1237–42.
- Duraker R, Demir B et al. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy results in the diagnosis of tubal occlusion. J Turk SocObstetGynecol. 2011; 8: 40–3.
- Swart P, Mol BW, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F et al. The accuracy of hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: a meta-analysis. FertilSteril. 1995; 64:486.
- Broeze KA, Opmeer BC et al. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta- analysis. Human Reprod Up-date. 2011; 17(3):293– 300.
- Robabeh M, Roozbeh T. Comparison of Hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in infertile Iranian women with tubal factors. Ginekol Pol. 2012 Nov; 83(11):841–3.
- Comparison of Estimation of Fetal Weight by Clinical Method, Ultrasonography and its Correlation with Actual Birth Weight in Term Pregnancy
Abstract Views :230 |
PDF Views:81
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik - 422003, IN
1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College Hospital & RC, Nashik - 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 5, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 75-81Abstract
Objective: To make a comparative evaluation of estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight by using: 1. Aymphysiofundal height x abdominal girth (dares formulae) 2. Ultrasonography (hadlock formulae). Materials and Methods: A prospective comparative study was carried out at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department and USG section of Department of Radiodiagnosis of Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College and research centre from August 2014 to December 2016, to compare the accuracy of clinical and ultrasonographic estimation of foetal weight with actual birth weight at term. One hundred pregnant women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria had their foetal weight estimated independently using clinical and ultrasonographic methods. Results: About three fourth of the study subjects were in normal weight range of 2.5-4 Kg while 16% were LBW and 8% were VLBW babies. Both Dare’s and Hadlock’s formulae shows good co-relation with actual birth weight across all weight ranges (r- 0.77 and 0.72; p<0.05 for both) with best correlation observed at weight range of 2.5 to 3.5 Kg. Correlation was slightly lower at extremes of weight at both end. In present study, on comparing prospectively clinical and sonographic methods of predicting birth weight prior to induction of labor at term, we found that clinical estimates appear to be as accurate as ultrasonographic ones. Conclusion: In developing country where ultrasound is not available in many health care delivery system, clinical estimation of foetal weight is an easy, cost effective and simple method.Keywords
Dares, Foetal Birth-Weight, Hadlock Formulae, Pregnancy, Ultrasonography.References
- Ugwu EO, Udealor PC, Dim CC, et al. Accuracy of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in predicting actual birth weight in Enugu, Southeastern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2014; 17(3):270–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1119-3077.130208 PMid:24714001
- Bajracharya J, Shrestha NS, Karki C. Accuracy of prediction of birth weight by fetal ultrasound. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2012; 10(38):74–6. https://doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i3.7053
- Ekele B, Otubu JAM. Maternal and perinatal mortality. Textbook of Obstetrics and Gynecology for Medical Student. Agboola A, editor. 2nd ed. Ibadan, Nigeria: Heinemann Educational Books; 2006. p. 526–31.
- Kehinde OA, Njokanma OF, Olanrewaju DM. Parental socioeconomic status and birth weight distribution of Nigerian term newborn babies. Nigerian Journal of Paediatrics. 2013; 40(3):299–302.
- Westerway SC. Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome. Australian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2012; 15(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2205-0140.2012.tb00136.x PMid:28191133 PMCid:PMC5025123
- Ashrafganjooei T, Naderi T, Eshrati B, Babapoor N. Accuracy of ultrasound, clinical and maternal estimates of birth weight in term women. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2010; 16(3):313–7. PMid:20795447
- Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005; 25(1):80–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1751 PMid:15505877
- Prechapanich J, Thitadilok W. Comparison of the accuracy of fetal weight estimation using clinical and sonographic methods. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. 2004; 87:51–7.
- Colman A, Maharaj D, Hutton J, Tuohy J. Reliability of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in term singleton pregnancies. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2006; 119:124–8.
- Sharma N, Srinivasan KJ, Sagayaraj MB, Lal DV. Fetal weight estimation methods—clinical, sonographic and MRI imaging. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2014; 4(1)2250–3153.
- Chauhan SP, et al. Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: Clinical versus and sonographic models. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 1995; 35:266–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1995.tb01978.x PMid:8546640
- Shittu AS, Kuti O, Orji EO, Makinde NO, Ogunniyi S, Ayoola O, et al. Clinical versus sonographic estimation of foetal weight in Southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007; 25(1):14–23. PMid:17615900 PMCid:PMC3013260
- Ratanasiri T, Jirapornkul S, Sombooporn W, Seejorn K, Patumnakul P. Comparison of the accuracy of ultrasonic fetal weight estimation by using the various equations. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002; 85:962–7. PMid:12450073
- Bossak WS, Spellacy WN. Accuracy of estimating fetal weight by abdominal palpation. J Reprod Med. 1972; 9:58– 60. PMid:5050404
- Titapant V, Chawanpaiboon S, Mingmitpatanakul K. A comparison of clinical and ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. J Med Assoc Thai. 2001; 84:1251–7. PMid:11800297
- Abramowicz JS, Sherer DM, Bar-Tov E, Woods JR, Jr. The cheek-to-cheek diameter in ultrasonographic assessment of fetal growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165(Pt 1):846–52. [PubMed]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378%2891%2990427-S
- Nzeh DA, Rimmar S, Moore WMO, Hunt L. Prediction of birth weight by fetal ultrasound biometry. Br J Radiol. 1992; 66:987–9. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-65-779-987 PMid:1450836
- Mehdizadeh A, Alaghehbandan R, Horsan H. Comparison of clinical versus ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Am J Perinatol. 2000; 17:233–6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-10003 PMid:11110339
- Ojwang S, Ouko BC. Prediction of fetal weight in utero by fundal height/girth measurements. J Obstet Gynecol East Central Afr. 1984; 3:111.
- Dare FO, Ademowore AS, Ifaturoti OO, Nganwuchu A. The value of symphysio fundal height/abdominal girth measurement in predicting fetal weight. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990; 31:243– 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7292%2890%2991018-L
- Siddiqua SA, et al. Comparative study of various methods of fetal weight estimation at term pregnancy. JMSCR. 2014; 2(10):2737–44.