Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kulkarni, Jyotsna
- Comparison of Snodgrass Tubularised Incised Plate Urethroplasty and Duckett Onlay Transverse Preputial Patch Urethroplasty for Correction of Penile Hypospadias
Abstract Views :142 |
PDF Views:102
Authors
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 60-64Abstract
Introduction: Hypospadias is defined as a condition where the urethra opens on the ventral aspect of the penis. It is commonly associated with penile curvature, usually ventral and is one of the most common genital birth defects in males. Hypospadias can be treated with numerous different surgical approaches numbering upto 200, and historically has been treated with procedures like Trans-Verse Island Flap (TVIF) on lay, Tubularised Incised-Plate (TIP), vertical preputial island flap, tubularised preputial flap, vertical preputial flap with double skin island etc. Present study was conducted to compare Snodgrass Tubularised Incised Plate Urethroplasty (TIP procedure) and Duckett Onlay Transverse Preputial Patch Urethroplasty for penile hypospadias correction. Material and Methods: Male patients between the age of 2-14 years who underwent correction of penile hypospadias by either of the two techniques viz. TIP (procedure) Urethroplasty and Duckett Onlay Transverse Preputial Patch Urethroplasty were included in the present prospective observational study after written informed consent. Results: The study was carried out with 40 patients and sorted into two groups, i.e. Snodgrass (S) and Duckett (D) group with 20 patients each. No difference was observed among study groups withregards to incidence of individual complications like urethrocutaneous fistula, stricture, or wound infection (p>0.05). However, total complication rate was marginally higher (55%) in Snodgrass’ procedure as compared to Duckett’s procedure (35%). All the cases of stricture (10%) and wound dehiscence (5%) were reported in Snodgrass group.Keywords
Snodgrass Urethroplasty, Duckett Onlay, Transverse Preputial, Patch Urethroplasty, Penile, Hypospadias, Ventral Penile CurvatureReferences
- Nelson CP, Park JM, Wan J, Bloom DA, Dunn RL, Wei JT. The increasing incidence of congenital penile anomalies in the United States. J Urol. 2005; 174:1573-1576. https://doi. org/10.1097/01.ju.0000179249.21944.7e. PMid:16148654.
- Schnack TH, Poulsen G, Myrup C, Wohlfahrt J, Melbye M. Familial coaggregation of cryptorchidism and hypospadias. Epidemiology. 2010; 21:109-113. https://doi.org/10.1097/ EDE.0b013e3181c15a50. PMid:19901839.
- Keays MA, Dave S. Current hypospadias management: Diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patientcentred outcomes. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 2017 Jan; 11(1-2Suppl1):S48. https://doi.org/10.5489/ cuaj.4386. PMid:28265319 PMCid:PMC5332236.
- van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL. Hypospadias, all there is to know. Eur J Pediatr. 2017; 176:435. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s00431-017-2864-5. PMid:28190103 PMCid: PMC5352742.
- Schneuer FJ, Holland AJ, Pereira G, Bower C, Nassar N. Prevalence, repairs and complications of hypospadias: an Australian population-based study. Arch Dis Child. 2015; 100:1038. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild- 2015-308809. PMid:26310454.
- Snodgrass W. Tubularised incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1994; 151:464-465. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)34991-1.
- Elder JS, Duckett JW, Snyder HM (1987) Onlay island flap in the repair of mid and distal penile hypospadias without chordee. J Urol. 138:376-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-5347(17)43152-1.
- Santanelli F, D’Andrea F, Savanelli A, Molea G, Scuderi N. Reconstruction of hypospadias with a vertical preputial island flap. A follow-up study of 127 patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1990; 24:67-73. https://doi. org/10.3109/02844319009004523. PMid:2389126.
- Duckett JW Jr. Transverse preputial island flap technique for repair of severe hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1980; 7:423-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094- 0143(21)01243-X.
- Santanelli F. Vertical preputial flap with double skin island for correction of hypospadias with severe recurvatum. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 33:305-312. https://doi. org/10.1097/00000637-199409000-00012. PMid:7985968.
- DeLair SM, Tanaka ST, Yap SA, Kurzrock EA. Training residents in hypospadias repair: Variations of involvement. J Urol. 2008; 179:1102-1106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. juro.2007.10.090. PMid:18206935.
- Esposito C, Savanelli A, Escolino M, Giurin I, Iaquinto M, Alicchio F, Roberti A, Settimi A. Preputioplasty associated with urethroplasty for correction of distal hypospadias: A prospective study and proposition of a new objective scoring system for evaluation of esthetic and functional outcome. J Pediatr Urol. 2014; 10:294-299. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.09.003. PMid:24145174.
- Standoli L. Correzione dell’ipospadiain un unico tempo: Técnica dell’uretroplastica con lembo ad isolaprepuziale. Rass Ital Chir Pediatr. 1979; 21:82.
- Chen SC, Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Chen YT. Tubularised incised plate urethroplasty for proximal hypospadias. BJU Int. 2000; 86:1050-1053. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464- 410x.2000.00966.x. PMid:11119100.
- Baskin LS, Erol A, Jegatheesan P, Li Y, Liu W, Cunha GR. Urethral seam formation and hypospadias. Cell Tissue Res. 2001; 305:379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004410000345. PMid:11572091.
- Baskin LS. Anatomical studies of the fetal genitalia: Surgical reconstructive implications. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2002; 511:239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0621-8_14. PMid:12575765.
- Double J Stenting - Clinical Profile, Indications and Post Operative Complications
Abstract Views :128 |
PDF Views:89
Authors
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
1 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Former PG Resident, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 65-70Abstract
Introduction: Ureteric stents have become one of the most basic and valuable tools in the urological practice. Indwelling ureteral stents provide direct drainage of the upper urinary tract to the bladder without the need for external diversion. The indications for insertion of stents into the urinary tract has expanded significantly during the last decade. However, their use is not free of complications and problems. The present study was designed to observe the clinical profile of patients presenting with obstructive uropathy at a tertiary care centre requiring DJ stents and to study the complications of indwelling DJ stents. Material and Methods: Data collection by meticulous history taking and clinical examination, appropriate laboratory and radiological investigations, operative findings, and follow-up of cases. Results: Study was conducted with 50 patients. nodule was 23%. Mean age of the subjects was 44.32 year. Overall male predominance was seen in present study with 70% males. Obstructive uropathy forms the major indication for DJ stenting followed by upper urinary tract infections (10%). Associated Complications were noticed in 46% of cases. Most common associated complication of DJ stenting was dysuria (24%) and increased frequency (22%). Urinary tract infection, haematuria, and stent migration was seen in 12%, 8% and 4% cases. Conclusion: Double stenting is an easy and effective procedure for the management of obstructive uropathy. However, we recommend that their use must be strictly restricted to selected cases and routine use should be avoided, as they are not free of complications. Moreover, close follow up of stented patients is essential for early detection of complications and a lot of stress should be paid on the counselling of the patients regarding stents complications and their timely removal in order to avoid stent encrustation/migration which could otherwise be highly fatal for the patient.Keywords
Double J, JJ/DJ Stent, Obstructive Uropathy, Ureteric StentsReferences
- Singh I. Indwelling JJ ureteral stents-a current perspective and review of literature. Indian Journal of Surgery. 2003; 65:405–12.
- Nawaz H, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Hussain Z. Experience with indwelling JJ stents. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 1993; 43:147–9.
- Paz A, Amiel GE, Pick N, Moskovitz B, Nativ O, Potasman I. Febrile complications following insertion of 100 double- J ureteral stents. Journal of the Endourological Society. 2005; 19:147–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2005.19.147. PMid:15798408
- Saltzman B. Ureteral stents: indications, variations and complications. Urologic Clinics of North America. 1988; 15:481–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(21)01594-9
- Pollard SG, Macfarlane R. Symptoms arising from double J ureteral stents. Journal of Urology. 1988; 139:37–8. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42282-8
- Memon NA, Talpur AA, Memon JM. Indications and complications of indwelling ureteral stenting at NMCH, Nawabshah. Journal Surgery of Pakistan. 2007; 23:187–91
- Richter S, Ringel A, Shalev, Nissenkorm I. The indwelling ureteric stent: A ‘friendly’ procedure with unfriendly high morbidity. nternational Brazilian Journal of Urology. 2009; 85:408–11. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464- 410x.1998.00543.x-i1. PMid:10691815
- Ivica S, Dragan S. Long-term indwelling double J stents: Bulky kidney and urinary bladder calculosis, spontaneous intraperitoneal perforation of the kidney and peritonitis as a result of “forgotten” double-J stent. Vojnosanitetski Pregled. 2009; 66:242–44. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP0903242S. PMid:19341233
- Mack T. The double J: Then and now. In: Yachia D, editor. Stenting the urinary system. Oxford: Isis Medical Media; 1998: p.101–6.
- Marmar JL. The management of ureteral obstruction with silicon rubber splint catheters. Journal of Urology. 1970; 104:386–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 5347(17)61744-0
- Happerlen TW, Mardis HK, Kammandel H. Self retained internal ureteral stents; A new approach. Journal of Urology. 1978; 119:731–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 5347(17)57613-2
- Gibbons RP, Mason JT, Correa RJ. Experience with indwelling silicone rubber ureteral catheters. Journal of Urology. 1974; 111:594–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 5347(17)60023-5
- Finny RP. Experience with new double J ureteral catheter stent. Journal of Urology. 1978; 120:678–81. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)57326-7
- Wang CJ, Huang SW, Chang CH. Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Urological Research. 2008; 37:83–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0175-7. PMid:19183976
- Olivera ST, Gjulsen S, Katica Z. Obstructive nephropathy as a result of malignant neoplasms: A Single Centre Experience. BANTAO Journal. 2010; 8:71–4.
- Al-Marhoon MS, Shareef O, Venkiteswaran KP. Complications and outcomes of JJ stenting of the ureter in urological practice: A single-centre experience. Arab Journal of Urology. 2012 Dec 1;10(4):372–7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.aju.2012.08.004. PMid:26558052. PMCid: PMC4442958
- Shah F, Nawaz A, Malik A. Indications and morbidity of indwelling ureteral stenting. Annals of Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences. 2011; 7(4):173–5.
- Singh CH, Munish T, Sandeep S, Singh AB, Ramneesh G, Simran K, et al. Morbidity associated with ureteral stenting: Study of 90 cases. Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 2015; 4(31):5349–54. https://doi. org/10.14260/jemds/2015/782
- Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Mondal PP, Pal DK. Longterm complications of JJ stent and its management: A 5 years review. Urology Annals. 2015; 7(1):41. https://doi. org/10.4103/0974-7796.148599. PMid:25657542. PMCid: PMC4310115
- Pensota MS, Rasool M, Saleem MS, Tabassum SA, Hussain A. Indications and complication of double J ureteral stenting: Our experience. Gomal Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013; 11:8–12.
- Ali A, Hathout S, Abdel-maguid A, Ali Y. The application of double-J stents in a university hospital: Revision of the indications and audit. Journal of American Science. 2017; 13(5):36–9.
- Ghaffar A. DJ-Stenting: Efficacy in the management of obstructive uropathy. Professional Medical Journal. 2007; 14:56–9. https://doi.org/10.29309/TPMJ/2007.14.01.3624
- Arshad M, Shah SS, Abbasi MH. Applications and complications of polyurethane stenting in urology. Journal of Ayub Medical College. 2006; 18:69–72.
- Nawaz H, Hussain M, Hashmi A, Hussain Z. Experience with indwelling JJ stents. Journal of Pakistan Medical Association. 1993; 43:147–9.