A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Fuse, Akshay
- Functional Outcome in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Single Row Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears
Authors
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 7, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 60-66Abstract
Introduction: Rotator cuff tears is a severely debilitating condition widely prevelant amongst the elderly age group. Timely adequate repair is of utmost importance. Aims and Objectives: To study the functional outcome of arthroscopic single row repair for rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methodology: We enrolled 30 patients of rotator cuff tears. Each patient underwent arthrosocpic single row repair in the lateral position with concomitant sub acromial decompression. Post operative protocol included immobilisation for 6 weeks followed by active assisted range of motion at 6 weeks and strengthening exercises at 3 months. We assessed the patient pre operatively and post operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months using Constant Score and Visual analog scale for pain. Results: There was significant improvement at every follow up with mean Constant Score increasing from pre operative to post operative stage at 6 months. According to individual relative Constant Score patients went from a mean of poor to good outcome. Visual analog scale for pain changed from a meanscore of severe to mild at 6 months post operatively. Conclusion: Arthroscopic single row repair is a simple, minimally invasive, cost effective procedure with good functional outcomes and pain relief.
Keywords
Arthroscopic, Outcome, Rotator Cuff, Single RowReferences
- Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan; 77(1):10–5. PMid: 7822341. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00002
- Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999 Jul-Aug; 8(4):296–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90148-9
- Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis.1995; 54(1):30–1.
- Dahm DL. Controversy remains regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Commentary on an article by Peter L.C. Lapner, MD, FRCSC, et al.: "A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing single row with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair". J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18; 94(14):e106. PMid: 22810413. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00525
- Yian EH, et al. The Constant Score in normal shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow surg. 2005 Mar-Apr; 14(2):128–33. PMid: 15789004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.003
- Fialka C, Oberleitner G, Stampfl P, Brannath W, Hexel M, Vécsei V. Modification of the Constant-Murley shoulder score-introduction of the individual relative. Constant Score Individual shoulder assessment. Injury. 2005 Oct; 36(10):1159–65. PMid: 16214462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.12.023
- Fabre T, Piton C, Leclouerec G, Gervais-Delion F, Durandeau A. Entrapment of the suprascapular nerve.
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May; 81(3):414–9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B3.0810414
- Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: Clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec; 95(6):1356–61. PMid: 11748392. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013
- Sauerbrey AM, Getz CL, Piancastelli M, Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR Jr. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comparison of clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2005 Dec; 21(12):1415–20. PMid: 16376228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.008
- Verma NN, Dunn W, Adler RS, Cordasco FA, Allen A, MacGillivray J, Craig E, Warren RF, Altchek DW. Allarthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up.
- Arthroscopy. 2006 Jun; 22(6):587–94. PMid: 16762695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2006.01.019
- Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C. Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul; (304):43–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199407000-00009
- Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Switzerland Z. Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Mar; 82(3):304–14. PMid: 10724223. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-20000300000002
- Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Jul; (304):78–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086199407000-00014
- Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J, Kohn D, Pape D. Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: Single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med. 2008 Aug; 36(8):1504–10. PMid: 18296541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508314424
- Xu C, Zhao J, Li D. Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Feb; 23(2):182–8. PMid: 24183478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.005
- Dahm DL. Controversy remains regarding the optimal technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Commentary on an article by Peter L.C. Lapner, MD, FRCSC, et al. "A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing singlerow with double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair". J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Jul 18; 94(14):e106. PMid: 22810413. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00525
- Chen M, Xu W, Dong Q, Huang Q, Xie Z, Mao Y. Outcomes of single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence. Arthroscopy. 2013 Aug; 29(8):1437–49. PMid: 23711754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.076
- Prasathaporn N, Kuptniratsaikul S, Kongrukgreatiyos K. Single-row repair versus double-row repair of fullthickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2011 Jul; 27(7):978–85. PMid: 21693349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.014
- Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ, Lee JT, Spiegl UJ. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr; 23(4):586–97. PMid: 24411671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.10.006
- Sheibani-Rad S, Giveans MR, Arnoczky SP, Bedi A. Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: A meta-analysis of the randomized clinical trials. Arthroscopy. 2013 Feb; 29(2):343–8. PMid: 23369480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.019
- Jin-Young Parl, et al. Comparisons of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. American Journal of Sports Medicine.2008 Jul; 36(7):1310–6. PMid: 18413680. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508315039
- Robertson TA. et al. Predictors of early complications after rotator cuff repair. Techniques in Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2016; 17(2):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1097/BTE.0000000000000082
- Functional outcome of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Anterior Cervical Plating Among Patients of Cervical Disc Disease at a Tertiary Health Care Centre
Authors
1 PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik - 422003, Maharashtra, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 7, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 67-77Abstract
Introduction: Cervical spondylosis means osteoarthritis of cervical spinal column. The degenerative process mainly affects the vertebrae, neural foramina and the facet joints. It leads to compression of the spinal cord resulting in progressive neural cell loss and neurological deterioration in 40 to 60 % of patients. Cervical myelopathy is a constellation of symptoms and physical findings including motor and sensory abnormalities. Spasticity and paresis are frequently seen. The patient often complaints of gait disturbance due to abnormalities incorticospinal tract and spinal spinocerebellar tracts. There is also associated loss of grip strength and finger movements. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure to remove a herniated or degenerative disc. An incision is made in the anterior cervical region and the disc is then removed. A graft is then placed to fuse the vertebrae above and below the disc. ACDF was first described by Cloward, Smith and Robinson in 1958 and shortly later by Hirsch in 1960 who described anterior cervical decompression and debated the necessity for inter body fusion. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been widely performed since the late 1950s and is currently recommended in patients in whom the nonoperative modalities for single level or multilevel disease have failed. Objectives: To study the functional outcome of cervical discectomy and fusion with anterior cervical plating among patients of cervical disc disease. Materials and Methods: 46 patients treated with ACDF with anterior cervical plating were considered in this study. Results and Conclusion: All the patients showed significant post-operative improvement in their symptoms and diagnostic scores. Thus, we can conclude that ACDF with anterior cervical plating is an efficient procedure in patients with cervical myelopathic symptoms not responding to conservative treatment.Keywords
Anterior Cervical Plates, Cervical Myelopathy, Fusion, Kirkaldy Willis, MJOA Score, NURICKReferences
- Clarke E, Robinson PK. Cervical myelopathy: A complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1956 Sep 1; 79(3):483–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/79.3.483. PMid:13364095.
- Stratford J. Congenital cervical spinal stenosis a factor in myelopathy. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1978 Mar 1; 41(1):101– 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01809140. PMid:665322.
- Baptiste DC, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. The Spine Journal. 2006 Nov 1; 6(6):S190– 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.024. PMid:17097538.
- Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C. Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology. 1987 Sep; 164(3):771–5. https://doi.org/10.1148/ radiology.164.3.3615879. PMid:3615879.
- Northover JR, Wild JB, Braybrooke J, Blanco J. The epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Skeletal Radiology. 2012 Dec 1; 41(12):1543–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1388-3. PMid:22426774.
- Hoff JT, Wilson CB. The pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy. Neurosurgery. 1977 Jan 1; 24(CN_suppl_1):474–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/neurosurgery/24.CN_suppl_1.474. PMid:583693.
- Brain L. Some unsolved problems of cervical spondylosis. British Medical Journal. 1963 Mar 23; 1(5333):771. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5333.771. PMid:14040811. PMCid:PMC2122616.
- Rao R. Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: Pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2002 Oct 1; 84(10):1872–81. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623200210000-00021. PMid:12377921.
- Rhee JM, Heflin JA, Hamasaki T, Freedman B. Prevalence of physical signs in cervical myelopathy: A prospective, controlled study. Spine. 2009 Apr 20; 34(9):890–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c944b. PMid:19352222.
- Houten JK, Noce LA. Clinical correlations of cervical myelopathy and the Hoffmann sign.
- Cook C, Roman M, Stewart KM, Leithe LG, Isaacs R. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of clinical special tests for myelopathy in patients seen for cervical dysfunction. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 2009 Mar; 39(3):172–8. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2009.2938. PMid:19252263.
- Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji TA, Yonenobu KA, Fujiwara KE, Yamashita KA. Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1987 Mar; 69(2):215. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301620X.69B2.3818752. PMid:3818752.
- Fehlings MG, Wilson JR, Yoon ST, Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Lawrence BD. Symptomatic progression of cervical myelopathy and the role of nonsurgical management: A consensus statement. Spine. 2013 Oct 15; 38(22S):S19– 20. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f4de. PMid:23963011.
- Matz PG, Anderson PA, Holly LT, Groff MW, Heary RF, Kaiser MG, et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2009 Aug; 11(2):104–11. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.1.SPINE08716. PMid:19769489.
- Rhee JM, Shamji MF, Erwin WM, Bransford RJ, Yoon ST, Smith JS, Kim HJ, Ely CG, Dettori JR, Patel AA, KalsiRyan S. Nonoperative management of cervical myelopathy: A systematic review. Spine. 2013 Oct 15;38(22S):S5567. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f41d. PMid:23963006.
- Bernhardt M, Hynes RA, Blume HW, Augustus III A. Current Concept Review. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1993 Jan 1; 75(1):119– 28. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199301000-00016. PMid:8419381.
- Herkowitz HN. A comparison of anterior cervical fusion, cervical laminectomy, and cervical laminoplasty for the surgical management of multiple level spondylotic radiculopathy. Spine. 1988 Jul; 13(7):774–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00011. PMid:3194786.
- LaROCCA HE. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Natural history. Spine. 1988 Jul 1; 13(7):854–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198807000-00028. PMid:3057650.
- Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine. 2007 Oct 1; 32(21):2310–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318154c57e. PMid:17906571.
- Hukuda S, Mochizuki T, Ogata M, Shichikawa K, Shimomura Y. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. A comparison of the results of anterior and posterior procedures. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 1985 Aug; 67(4):609–15. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301620X.67B4.4030860. PMid:4030860.
- Nurick S. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972 Jan 1; 95(1):101–8. https:// doi.org/10.1093/brain/95.1.101. PMid:5023079.
- Kato S, Oshima Y, Oka H, Chikuda H, Takeshita Y, Miyoshi K, et al. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 2; 10(4):e0123022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123022. PMid:25837285 PMCid:PMC4383381.
- DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: Intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1998 Jan 1; 86(1):102–6. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199801000-00020.
- Kim KT, Kim YB. Comparison between open procedure and tubular retractor assisted procedure for cervical radiculopathy: Results of a randomized controlled study. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2009 Aug 1; 24(4):649–53. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.649. PMid:19654947. PMCid:PMC2719221.
- Panjabi MM, White III AA, Johnson RM. Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. Journal of Biomechanics. 1975 Sep 1; 8(5):327–36. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(75)90085-8.
- Bazaz R, Lee MJ, Yoo JU. Incidence of dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: A prospective study. Spine. 2002 Nov 15; 27(22):2453–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632200211150-00007. PMid:12435974.
- Clavenna AL, Beutler WJ, Gudipally M, Moldavsky M, Khalil S. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and threelevel ACDF models: An in vitro cadaveric study. The Spine Journal. 2012 Feb 1; 12(2):157–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. spinee.2012.01.011. PMid:22405617.
- The Functional Outcome of Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Meniscus Repair
Authors
1 Former PG Resident, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
3 Professor and Head, Department of Orthopedics, Dr. Vasantrao Pawar Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Nashik – 422003, IN
Source
MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, Vol 8, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 99-104Abstract
Background: Meniscal repair is performed in an attempt to prevent post-traumatic arthritis resulting from meniscal dysfunction after meniscal tears. The socio-economic implications of premature arthritis are significant in the young patient population. Investigations and techniques focusing on meniscus preservation and healing are now at the forefront of orthopaedic sports medicine. Methods: All unilateral primary ACL reconstructions in a prospective cohort who had meniscal repair at the time of ACLR were evaluated. Validated patient oriented outcome instruments were completed preoperatively and then again at follow up. Results: 65 unilateral primary ACL reconstructions were performed concomitant meniscal repairs during the study period. Patient follow-up was obtained, allowing confirmation of meniscal repair success (defined as no repeat arthroscopic procedure) or failure. Conclusions: Meniscal repair is a successful procedure in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. When confronted with a “repairable” meniscal tear at the time of ACL reconstruction, orthopaedic surgeons can expect an estimated >90% clinical success rate using a variety of methods as shown in our study.Keywords
Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Meniscal Repair, Reconstruction, Meniscal TearReferences
- Gordon MD, Steiner ME. Anterior Cruciate Ligament injuries. Orthopaedics Knowledge Update Sports Medicine III, Garrick JG (Ed). Rosemont: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery; 2004. p. 169.
- Kim S, Bosque J, Meehan JP, Jamali A, Marder R. Increase in outpatient knee arthroscopy in the United States: A comparison of National Surveys of Ambulatory Surgery, 1996 and 2006. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:994–1000. PMid: 21531866. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01618
- Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10 year results after Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction. How the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37:471–80. PMid: 19059893. https://doi. org/10.1177/0363546508326709
- Fairbank T. Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1948; 4:664-–70. PubMed: 18894618. https:// doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.30B4.664
- Cannon Jr WD. Arthroscopic meniscal repair. Inside-out technique and results. Am J Knee Surg. 1996; 9:137–43.
- Dean CS, Chahla J, Matheny LM, Mitchell JJ, LaPrade RF. Outcomes after biologically augmented isolated meniscal repair with marrow venting are comparable with those after meniscal repair with concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45(6):1341–8. PMid: 28298056. https://doi. org/10.1177/0363546516686968
- Freedman KB, Nho SJ, Cole BJ. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19(7):794–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749- 8063(03)00695-9
- Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW. Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94:2222–7. PMid: 23318612 PMCid: PMC3528023. https:// doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01584
- Uzun E, Misir A, Kizkapan TB, Ozcamdalli M, Akkurt S, Guney A. Factors affecting the outcomes of arthroscopically repaired traumatic vertical longitudinal medial meniscal tears. Orthop J Sports Med, 2017; 5(6). PMid: 28680898 PMCid: PMC5484431. https://doi. org10.1177/2325967117712448
- Cannon Jr WD, Vittori JM. The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in Anterior Cruciate Ligament - reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20:176–81. PMid: 1558246. https://doi. org/10.1177/036354659202000214
- DeHaven KE, Black KP, Griffiths HJ. Open meniscus repair. Technique and two to nine year results. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17:788–95. PMid: 2696377. https://doi. org/10.1177/036354658901700612
- Toman C, Spindler KP. Success of Meniscal Repair at ACL Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2009 June; 37(6):1111– 5. PMid: 19465734 PMCid: PMC3692358. https://doi. org/10.1177/0363546509337010
- Westermann RW, Wright RW, Huston LJ. MOON Group and BR Wolf Meniscal Repair with Concurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction: Operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Sep; 42(9):2184–92. PMid: 25023440 PMCid: PMC4451057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546514536022
- Erdal Uzun E, Misir A, Kizkapan TB. Arthroscopic medial meniscal repair with or without concurrent Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction: A subgroup analysis. The Knee. 2018; 25:109–17. PMid: 29162378. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.11.003
- Kotsovolos ES, Hantes ME, Mastrokalos DS, Lorbach O, Paessler HH. Results of all-inside meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22:3–9. PMid: 16399454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. arthro.2005.10.017
- Hu Y, Xu X, Pan X, Yu H, Zhang Y, Wen H. Combined outside-in and Fast-Fix sutures for the treatment of serious discoid meniscal tears: a midterm follow-up study. Knee. 2016; 23(6):1143–7. PMid: 27651201. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.10.011
- Ahn JH, Lee YS, Yoo JC, Chang MJ, Koh KH, Kim MH. Clinical and second look arthroscopic evaluation of repaired medial meniscus in Anterior Cruciate Ligament- reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(3):472–7. PMid: 20097926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546509348102