Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Study on the Impact and the Requirements of Managerial Aspects in Microfinance


Affiliations
1 Doctoral Scholar, Department of Commerce and International Trade, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences Deemed University, Coimbatore. Tamil Nadu, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This study examines the impact of microfinance lending by assessing the livelihood status of borrowers in the preand post-credit scenarios, based on a field work conducted in Kottayam district, Kerala. While doing so, this study also ascertained the perception of borrowers about managerial and training requirements. The results revealed a significant difference in all the three parameters in the post-credit period, namely, physical, financial and employment generation aspects. While credit disbursement was rated as efficient, there was no mid- term corrections and training. Also, there was no separate mechanism for identifying options for better return on investments and identifying bottlenecks in production system. The additional training for human resources development was felt by nearly all respondents. This study emphasises that the microfinance programme has to evolve separate training modules for its participants to make the interventions more successful.

Keywords

Microfinance, Human Resources, Managerial Aspects and Training
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Bansal, D (2010): Impact of Microfinance on Poverty, Employment and Women Empowerment
  • in Rural Punjab, Ph.D Thesis, Punjabi University, Punjab.
  • Banu, D, F Farashuddin, A Hossain and S Akter (2001): “Empowering Women in Rural
  • Bangladesh: Impact of Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee’s (BRAC’s)
  • Programme”, Journal of International Women’s Studies, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp.29-53,
  • Retrieved from www.bridgew.edu/SoAS/jiws/June01/Dilruba.pdf.
  • Benjamin, F, E M Field and R Pande (2011): Building Social Capital through Microfinance),
  • NBER Working Paper No. 16018, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from http://www.nber.
  • org/papers/w 16018.
  • Blyden, S (2017): “BRAC Ranked Number One NGO in the World”, Sierra Leone News,
  • Retrieved from http://news.sl/drwebsite/publish/article_200528958.html.
  • Chatterjee, S (2014): “Self-Help Groups and Economic Empowerment of Rural Women:
  • A Case Study”, International Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, Vol. 2, No. 6,
  • pp.152-157.
  • Christen R P, R Rosenberg and V Jayadeva (2004): Financial Institutions with a “Double
  • Bottom Line: Implications for the Future of Microfinance”, CGAP, and Retrieved from
  • https://www.cgap.org
  • THE MICROFINANCE REVIEW • Volume XIII(34 1) January-June 2021
  • Ernst and Young Global Ltd. and ASSOCHAM (2016): “Building a Better Working World”,
  • Evolving Landscape of Microfinance Institutions in India, pp.3.
  • Fernandez, A P (2003): Watershed Management – Are Loans More Effective in Promoting
  • Participation and Ownership than Contribution? The Roles of Panchayat Raj Institutions,
  • Rural Management Systems Series - Paper 36, MYRADA, Bangalore.
  • Gaonkar, R R (2001): “Working and Impact of Self-Help Groups in Goa”, Indian Journal
  • of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp.471.
  • Hermes, N (2014): “Does Microfinance Affect Income Inequality?”, Applied Economics,
  • Vol. 46, No. 9, pp.1021-1034.
  • Hossain, M (1988): Credit for Alleviation of Rural Poverty: The Grameen Bank in
  • Bangladesh, IFPRI Research Report, No. 65, International Food Policy Research
  • Institute, Washington, DC.
  • Hoque, M, M Chishty and R Halloway (2011): “Commercialisations and Changes in Capital
  • Structure in Microfinance Institutions: An Innovation or Wrong Turn?”, Managerial
  • Finance, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp.414-425.
  • Hulme, D and P Mosley (1996): Finance Against Poverty: Volume 1, Rutledge Publications,
  • London.
  • Lennon, I (2014): Alles Overeen Klein Bedrag Lenen. Retrieved from http/goalskleinbed
  • raglenen.el/
  • Littlefield, E, J Morduch and S Hashemi (2003): Is Microfinance an Effective Strategy to
  • Reach the Millennium Development Goals?, Focus Note No. 24, CGAP, Washington DC.
  • Morduch, J (1998): Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship
  • Programs in Bangladesh, Working Paper, No. 198, Woodrow Wilson School of Public
  • and International Affairs, Princeton University, New Jersey.
  • National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (2017): Status Report on
  • Microfinance in India, NABARD, Mumbai.
  • Nirmala, V and K K Yepthomi (2014): “Self-Help Groups: A Strategy for Poverty Alleviation
  • in Rural Nagaland, India”, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology, Vol.
  • , No. 6, pp.23-32.
  • Puhazhendhi, V and K C Badatya (2002): SHG-Bank Linkage Programme for Rural Poor
  • in India - An Impact Assessment, Micro-credit Innovations Department, NABARD,
  • Mumbai.
  • Roodman, D (2011): Due Diligence: An Impertinent Inquiry into Microfinance, Centre for
  • Global Development, Washington, DC.
  • Rutherford, S and S Arora (2009): The Poor and their Money: Microfinance from a 21st
  • Century Consumers Perspective, Warwickshire, UK Practical Action p.4.
  • Siddiqui, K and F G Gilal (2013): Perception Towards Microfinance in Pakistan, Asian
  • Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 1, No. 10, p.6-10.
  • Singh, D K (2001): “Impact of Self-Help Groups on the Economy of Marginalised Farmers
  • of Kanpur Dehat District of Uttar Pradesh”, Proceedings of the Sixty-first Annual
  • Conference of the Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, December 27-29, 2001,
  • Department of Economics, University of Gulbarga, Karnataka.
  • Snedecore, G W and W G Cochran (1967): Statistical Methods (1st Ed.), Oxford and IBH
  • Publication (India), New Delhi.

Abstract Views: 150

PDF Views: 0




  • A Study on the Impact and the Requirements of Managerial Aspects in Microfinance

Abstract Views: 150  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Divya Sajan
Doctoral Scholar, Department of Commerce and International Trade, Karunya Institute of Technology and Sciences Deemed University, Coimbatore. Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract


This study examines the impact of microfinance lending by assessing the livelihood status of borrowers in the preand post-credit scenarios, based on a field work conducted in Kottayam district, Kerala. While doing so, this study also ascertained the perception of borrowers about managerial and training requirements. The results revealed a significant difference in all the three parameters in the post-credit period, namely, physical, financial and employment generation aspects. While credit disbursement was rated as efficient, there was no mid- term corrections and training. Also, there was no separate mechanism for identifying options for better return on investments and identifying bottlenecks in production system. The additional training for human resources development was felt by nearly all respondents. This study emphasises that the microfinance programme has to evolve separate training modules for its participants to make the interventions more successful.

Keywords


Microfinance, Human Resources, Managerial Aspects and Training

References