The Microfinance Review

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Outreach Performance of the MFI Sector:An Empirical Study


Affiliations
1 CRFIM, BIRD, Lucknow, India
2 BIRD, Lucknow, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) have seen incredible growth in the past few years in India. However, there is a concern that the growth in the number of clients lags behind the growth in loan portfolio. In this context, this study intends to analyse the outreach of different categories of MFIs in terms of breadth, scope and depth. The study uses both, MFI-level and clientlevel data. The client-level data is drawn from 600 clients of 10 MFIs in five states. The MFIs were chosen from categories based on legal status and scale of operation. Larger Non Banking Financial Company-Micro Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs) were found to be having better geographical spread. However, in terms of other breadth of outreach variables, the performance depends upon the delivery models rather than the legal status and the scale of operation. In terms of scope of outreach, non-NBFC MFIs (like Annapurna Co-operative) were found to be better performing. The poverty outreach of the sample MFIs is much lower than the National Poverty Line. The study suggests developing an ecosystem of 'Not-for-Profit' companies in India for creating an alternate model of microfinance based on overall development of the clients. Additionally it also recommends introducing well-designed saving products and low-cost health and education services for the poor so as to ensure poverty reduction on a sustainable basis.

Keywords

Microfinance Institutions, NBFC-MFIs, Poverty.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • Annapurna (2016): Annapurna Annual Report 2015-16, Annapurna, Pune.

  • Bharatiya Micro Credit (2016): BMC Annual Report 2015-16, BMC, Lucknow.

  • Cashpor (2016): Cashpor Annual Report 2015-16, Cashpor, Varanasi.

  • Champatiray, A K, Agarwal P and Sadhu S (2010): “Map of Microfinance Distribution in India”, IFMR Centre for Microfinance, Chennai.

  • Grameen Foundation India (2015): Microfinance Poverty Outreach in PSIG States, Retrieved from http://www.progressoutofpoverty.org/sites/default/files/Four%20State%20POR%20 _Synt esis_Report_2015.pdf.

  • Khamar, M and Martinez, R (2015): “India Microfinance Geographical Index: A Tool to Measure Microfinance Service Penetration Across India”, MIX, Washington DC.

  • Midland (2016): Midland Annual Report 2015-16, Midland, Jalandhar.

  • Nabard Financial Services Limited (2016): NABFINS Annual Report 2015-16, NABFINS, Bengaluru.

  • Navajas, S, Schreiner, M, Meyer, R L, Gonzalez-Vega, C, and Rodriguez-Meza, J (2000): “Microcredit and the Poorest of the Poor: Theory and Evidence from Bolivia”, World development, 28(2), 333-346.

  • Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Nidhi (2016): RGVN (NE) Microfinance Annual Report 2015-16, RGVN, Guwahati.

  • Rathore, B S, Kumar, D and Deshpande, D V (2016): “Institutional Analysis of Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): Status and Measures for Wider and Effective Outreach”, The Microfinance Review, 8(2), 16-33.

  • Shree Kshetra Dharmasthala Rural Development Project (2016): SKDRDP Annual Report 2015-16, SKDRDP, Dharmasthala.

  • SaDhan (2016): The Bharat Microfinance Report 2016, SaDhan, New Delhi.

  • Sanghamithra (2016): Sanghamithra Annual Report 2015-16, Sanghamithra, Bengaluru.

  • Sonata (2016): Sonata Annual Report 2015-16, Sonata, Lucknow.

  • Ujjivan (2016): Ujjivan Annual Report 2015-16, Ujjivan, Bengaluru.

  • http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=123563


Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 2




  • Outreach Performance of the MFI Sector:An Empirical Study

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Bhawani Singh Rathore
CRFIM, BIRD, Lucknow, India
Gyanendra Rout
BIRD, Lucknow, India
D. V. Deshpande
BIRD, Lucknow, India

Abstract


Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) have seen incredible growth in the past few years in India. However, there is a concern that the growth in the number of clients lags behind the growth in loan portfolio. In this context, this study intends to analyse the outreach of different categories of MFIs in terms of breadth, scope and depth. The study uses both, MFI-level and clientlevel data. The client-level data is drawn from 600 clients of 10 MFIs in five states. The MFIs were chosen from categories based on legal status and scale of operation. Larger Non Banking Financial Company-Micro Finance Institutions (NBFC-MFIs) were found to be having better geographical spread. However, in terms of other breadth of outreach variables, the performance depends upon the delivery models rather than the legal status and the scale of operation. In terms of scope of outreach, non-NBFC MFIs (like Annapurna Co-operative) were found to be better performing. The poverty outreach of the sample MFIs is much lower than the National Poverty Line. The study suggests developing an ecosystem of 'Not-for-Profit' companies in India for creating an alternate model of microfinance based on overall development of the clients. Additionally it also recommends introducing well-designed saving products and low-cost health and education services for the poor so as to ensure poverty reduction on a sustainable basis.

Keywords


Microfinance Institutions, NBFC-MFIs, Poverty.

References