Manufacturing Technology Today

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of process variables on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated via selective laser melting process


Affiliations
1 National Institute of Technology Delhi, India
2 CSIR–National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, India
3 Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Selective laser melting process (SLM) is a metal additive manufacturing technique with excellent design freedom and feasibility. In SLM, a high-energy source is used to melt powder particles into a pattern of successive layers. However, the major challenge associated with the SLM process is that the parts have a high surface roughness (Ra) compared to forming, machining, and rolling processes. In this paper, the core parameters, including scan speed, hatch distance, laser power, and energy density effects discussed as the roughness parameters. The experimental runs were designed based on Taguchi L9 orthogonal array. The results displayed that Ra of samples was largely affected by laser power as compared to scanning speed and hatching spacing. The Ra of samples achieved less at high energy density. In contrast to other surface finishing operations, the polished sample showed the average Ra value of 0.049 μm manufactured at an energy density of 58.83 J/mm3.

Keywords

Selective Laser Melting, Process Parameter, Energy Density, 316L SS, Surface Roughness.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • AlMangour, B., Grzesiak, D., & Yang, J. M. (2017). In-situ formation of novel TiC-particle-reinforced 316L stainless steel bulk-form composites by selective laser melting. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 706, 409-418.

  • Aqilah, D. N., Farazila, Y., Suleiman, D. Y., Amirah, M. A. N., & Izzati, W. B. W. N. (2018). Effects of process parameters on the surface roughness of stainless steel 316L parts produced by selective laser melting. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 46(4), 1673-1683.

  • Brytan, Z. (2017). Comparison of vacuum sintered and selective laser melted steel AISI 316L. Archives of Metallurgy and Materials, 62.

  • Calignano, F., Manfredi, D., Ambrosio, E. P., Iuliano, L., & Fino, P. (2013). Influence of process parameters on surface roughness of aluminum parts produced by DMLS. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67(9), 2743-2751.

  • Cherry, J. A., Davies, H. M., Mehmood, S., Lavery, N. P., Brown, S. G. R., & Sienz, J. (2015). Investigation into the effect of process parameters on microstructural and physical properties of 316L stainless steel parts by selective laser melting. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 76(5), 869-879.

  • Ghorbani, J., Li, J., & Srivastava, A. K. (2020). Application of optimized laser surface re-melting process on selective laser melted 316L stainless steel inclined parts. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 56, 726-734.

  • Kurzynowski, T., Gruber, K., Stopyra, W., Kuźnicka, B., & Chlebus, E. (2018). Correlation between process parameters, microstructure and properties of 316 L stainless steel processed by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 718, 64-73.

  • Pant, M., Nagdeve, L., Kumar, H., & Moona, G. (2022). A contemporary investigation of metal additive manufacturing techniques. Sādhanā, 47(1), 1-19.

  • Prashanth, K. G., Scudino, S., Maity, T., Das, J., & Eckert, J. (2017). Is the energy density a reliable parameter for materials synthesis by selective laser melting. Materials Research Letters, 5(6), 386-390.

  • Song, B., Dong, S., Zhang, B., Liao, H., & Coddet, C. (2012). Effects of processing parameters on microstructure and mechanical property of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V. Materials & Design, 35, 120-125.

  • Strano, G., Hao, L., Everson, R. M., & Evans, K. E. (2013). Surface roughness analysis, modelling and prediction in selective laser melting. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 213(4), 589-597.

  • Sun, Z., Tan, X., Tor, S. B., & Chua, C. K. (2018). Simultaneously enhanced strength and ductility for 3D-printed stainless steel 316L by selective laser melting. NPG Asia Materials, 10(4), 127-136.

  • Thijs, L., Verhaeghe, F., Craeghs, T., Van Humbeeck, J., & Kruth, J. P. (2010). A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V. Acta materialia, 58(9), 3303-3312.

  • Wang, D., Liu, Y., Yang, Y., & Xiao, D. (2016). Theoretical and experimental study on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel metal parts obtained through selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 22(4), 706-716.

  • Yakout, M., Elbestawi, M. A., & Veldhuis, S. C. (2018). On the characterization of stainless steel 316L parts produced by selective laser melting. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(5), 1953-1974.


Abstract Views: 55

PDF Views: 0




  • Influence of process variables on surface roughness of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated via selective laser melting process

Abstract Views: 55  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Meena Pant
National Institute of Technology Delhi, India
Leeladhar Nagdeve
National Institute of Technology Delhi, India
Girija Moona
CSIR–National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi, India
Harish Kumar
National Institute of Technology Delhi, India
J. Ramkumar
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India

Abstract


Selective laser melting process (SLM) is a metal additive manufacturing technique with excellent design freedom and feasibility. In SLM, a high-energy source is used to melt powder particles into a pattern of successive layers. However, the major challenge associated with the SLM process is that the parts have a high surface roughness (Ra) compared to forming, machining, and rolling processes. In this paper, the core parameters, including scan speed, hatch distance, laser power, and energy density effects discussed as the roughness parameters. The experimental runs were designed based on Taguchi L9 orthogonal array. The results displayed that Ra of samples was largely affected by laser power as compared to scanning speed and hatching spacing. The Ra of samples achieved less at high energy density. In contrast to other surface finishing operations, the polished sample showed the average Ra value of 0.049 μm manufactured at an energy density of 58.83 J/mm3.

Keywords


Selective Laser Melting, Process Parameter, Energy Density, 316L SS, Surface Roughness.

References