Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kalsie, Anjala
- FDI in Greenfield Investment vs M&A : its Impact on GD : a Comprehensive Analysis of Developed, BRICS & East Asian Economies
Abstract Views :367 |
PDF Views:160
Authors
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Management Studies University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
1 Faculty of Management Studies University of Delhi, Delhi-110007, IN
Source
Review of Professional Management- A Journal of New Delhi Institute of Management, Vol 12, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 1-15Abstract
Capital formation is an important determinant of economic growth. While domestic investments add to the capital stock in an economy, FDI plays a complementary role in overall capital formation and in filling the gap between domestic savings and investment. This paper attempts to examine the effect of two modes of FDI - Mergers &Acquisitions (M&As) and Greenfield FDI on GDP of a nation in different categories of countries - Developed Economies, BRICs and the 5 South East Asian (A5) nations. Using the VAR methodology, it was found that the GDP, cross border M&A and Greenfield FDI impact each other to some extent. There is a link between cross border M&A, Greenfield FDI and GDP. The extent varies according to the type of the country.Keywords
FDI in Mergers & Acquisitions (M&As), Fdi in Greenfield Investment GDP, BRICS, East Asian Economics.- Capital Account Convertibility and Financial Sector Reforms
Abstract Views :483 |
PDF Views:150
Authors
Affiliations
1 Fortune Institute of International Business, IN
2 NDIM, IN
1 Fortune Institute of International Business, IN
2 NDIM, IN
Source
Review of Professional Management- A Journal of New Delhi Institute of Management, Vol 7, No 1 (2009), Pagination: 44-50Abstract
There can be no doubt, however, that the risks associated with capital account opening can be potentially severe; nobody denies this. But the challenge is to keep a measure of balance between those risks (which are typically stressed by the domestic producers of financial services) and the corresponding benefits (which affect a less vocal group, the domestic consumers of those services).This paper focuses on the liberalization of capital account and that of domestic financial sectors. Although it's true that macro economic environment was equally important before going into capital account liberalization the same is not dealt in this paper The paper is divided as follows Section 2 talks about Capital Account Convertibility, Section 3 is about Prudential and Supen'isoiy Concerns, Section 4 deals with the Problems in Financial Sector Reforms and Section 5 finally Conclude.
- The Relationship between Foreign Ownership and Firm Performance in India:An Empirical Analysis
Abstract Views :655 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 IILM, Greater Noida, IN
2 University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
1 IILM, Greater Noida, IN
2 University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
Source
Artha Vijnana: Journal of The Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Vol 59, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 152-162Abstract
The paper examines the impact of foreign ownership (foreign promoter, foreign corporate shareholding and foreign institutional investors) on firm performance. The empirical analysis is done on the panel data of 145 non-financial NSE listed companies for a period of five years, i.e., from 2008-2012. Firm performance has been measured using market based measure Tobin’s Q and accounting based measures Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE). Multiple regression analysis is done using Pooled OLS and Panel Data-Random Effect Model. Foreign ownership is found to have a positive and significant impact on firm performance measures under Pooled OLS model, but the impact is found only positive in Random Effect Regression. The relationship between foreign corporate ownership and firm performance is positive and significant at varying level of significance. Foreign institutional ownership is found to have an ambiguous relationship with different firm performance measures used.References
- Chhibber, P.K. and S.K. Majumdar (1999), Foreign Ownership and Profitability: Property Rights, Control, and the Performance of Firms in Indian Industry, The Journal of Law and Economics, 42(1): 209-238.
- Choi, S.B., B.I.ParkandP. Hong (2012), Does Ownership Structure Matter for Firm Technological Innovation Performance? The Case of Korean Firms, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(3): 267-288.
- Douma, S., R. George, and R. Kabir (2006), Foreign and Domestic Ownership, Business Groups, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Large Emerging Market, Strategic Management Journal, 27(7): 637-657.
- Gedajlovic, E., T. Yoshikawa and M. Hashimoto (2005), Ownership Structure, Investment behaviour and Firm Performance in Japanese Manufacturing Industries, Organization Studies, 26(1): 7-35.
- Gurbuz, A.O., A.Aybars, and O.Kutlu (2010), Corporate Governance and Financial Performance with a Perspective on Institutional Ownership: Empirical Evidence from Turkey, Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 8(2): 21.
- Khanna, T., and K. Palepu (2000), Emerging Market Business Groups, Foreign Intermediaries, and Corporate Governance, In Concentrated Corporate Ownership, pp. 265-294, University of Chicago Press.
- Kumar, J. (2004), Does Ownership Structure Influence Firm Value? Evidence from India, Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 9(2): 61-93.
- Pant, M., and M. Pattanayak (2010), Corporate Governance, Competition and Firm Performance: Evidence from India, Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 9(3): 347-381.
- Phung, D.N., and T.P.V. Le (2013), Foreign Ownership, Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Vietnamese Listed Firms, IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 12(2): 40.
- Sarkar, J., and S. Sarkar (2000), Large Shareholder Activism in Corporate Governance in Developing Countries: Evidence from India, International Review of Finance, 1(3): 161-194.
- Yudaeva, K., K. Kozlov, N. Melentieva, and N.Ponomareva (2003), Does Foreign Ownership Matter?, Economics of Transition, 11(3): 383-409.
- Drivers of Synergy Gains in Indian M&As: A System GMM Approach
Abstract Views :191 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Anjala Kalsie
1,
Neha Singh
2
Affiliations
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
2 Senior Research Scholar, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
1 Associate Professor, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
2 Senior Research Scholar, Faculty of Management Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi, IN
Source
Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, Vol 11, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 1-15Abstract
The aim of this article is to show the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A, by examining 120 M&A deals which took place between 2005 and 2015. The aim of the present study is to examine: (a) if the target is small relative to acquirer, then synergy gains will also be small, (b) if the mode of payment for the deal is cash, greater synergies are gained, and (c) if the acquisitions take place in related industries more synergies are gained. The paper uses system generalised methods of moments (GMM) estimation method to estimate the relationship. The results demonstrate that the profitability of acquiring entities increases in post-M&A stage, when the deal is settled in cash and mergers take place in related industries. Synergistic advantages of M&A appear to be perceived by enhanced market cap to assets, improvement in financial leverage, and a positive operating cash flow return on asset. The paper examines a comprehensive set of Indian domestic M&A deals. Such extensive study to assess the potential realisation of synergistic advantages for Indian firms experiencing M&A has not been undertaken in the literature so far. The study’s policy ramifications are that regulators should facilitate the creation of an effective market for corporate regulation. The M&A strategy is highly important in the post-liberalisation phase in the corporate restructuring process. M&A creates synergy with the effective utilisation of capital in the long run.Keywords
Mergers and Acquisitions, Corporate Performance, India, Synergies, System Generalised Methods of MomentsReferences
- Agrawal, A., Jaffe, J. F., & Mandelker, G. N. (1992). The post-merger performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. The Journal of Finance, 47(4), 1605-1621.
- Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
- Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
- Asquith, P. (1983). Merger bids, uncertainty, and stockholder returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 51-83.
- Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data. John Wiley & Sons.
- Barai, P., & Mohanty, P. (2014). Role of industry relatedness in performance of Indian acquirers—Long- and short-run effects. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(4), 1045-1073.
- Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143.
- Bond, S. R. (2002). Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 141-162.
- Bond, S. R., & Windmeijer, F. (2002). Finite sample inference for GMM estimators in linear panel data models.
- Brañas-Garza, P., Bucheli, M., & García-Muñoz, T. (2011). Dynamic panel data: A useful technique in experiments.
- Campa, J. M., & Hernando, I. (2006). M&As performance in the European financial industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(12), 3367-3392.
- Choi, I. (2001). Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20(2), 249-272.
- Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2004). Consolidation in the European insurance industry: Do mergers and acquisitions create value for shareholders?
- Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 2004(1), 217-258.
- Dargenidou, C., Gregory, A., & Hua, S. (2016). How far does financial reporting allow us to judge whether M&A activity is successful? Accounting and Business Research, 46(5), 467-499.
- Dash, A. (2004). Value creation through mergers: The myth and reality. The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, 10(10), 20-38.
- Devos, E., Kadapakkam, P. R., & Krishnamurthy, S. (2009). How do mergers create value? A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1179-1211.
- Dutta, S., & Jog, V. (2009). The long-term performance of acquiring firms: A re-examination of an anomaly. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(8), 1400-1412.
- Franks, J., Harris, R., & Titman, S. (1991). The postmerger share-price performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 29(1), 81-96.
- Ghosh, A. (2001). Does operating performance really improve following corporate acquisitions? Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 151-178.
- Godbole, P. G. (2015). Mergers, acquisitions and corporate restructuring. Vikas Publishing House Pvt Ltd.
- Gregory, A. (1997). An examination of the long run performance of UK acquiring firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(7-8), 971-1002.
- Hamza, T., Sghaier, A., & Thraya, M. F. (2016). How do takeovers create synergies? Evidence from France. Studies in Business and Economics, 11(1), 54-72.
- Harding, D., & Rovit, S. (2004). Mastering the merger: Four critical decisions that make or break the deal. Harvard Business Press.
- Healy, P. M., Palepu, K. G., & Ruback, R. S. (1992). Does corporate performance improve after mergers? Journal of Financial Economics, 31(2), 135-175.
- Jarrell, G. A., Brickley, J. A., & Netter, J. M. (1988). The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2(1), 49-68.
- Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
- Junge, L. M. (2014). Operating synergy: Types and their impact on post-merger performance (Unpublished thesis).
- Kim, J. Y., & Canina, L. (2013). Acquisition premiums and performance improvements for acquirers and targets in the lodging industry. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 54(4), 416-425.
- Kumar, R. (2009). Post-merger corporate performance: An Indian perspective. Management Research News.
- Laabs, J. P., & Schiereck, D. (2010). The long-term success of M&A in the automotive supply industry: Determinants of capital market performance. Journal of Economics and Finance, 34(1), 61-88.
- Langetieg, T. C. (1978). An application of a three-factor performance index to measure stockholder gains from merger. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(4), 365-383.
- Leepsa, N. M., & Mishra, C. S. (2012). Post-merger financial performance: A study with reference to select manufacturing companies in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 83(83), 6-17.
- Manson, S., Powell, R., Stark, A. W., & Thomas, H. M. (2000, December). Identifying the sources of gains from takeovers. Accounting Forum, 24(4), 319-343.
- Moeller, S. B., Schlingemann, F. P., & Stulz, R. M. (2004). Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201-228.
- Mohanty, P., & Mishra, S. (2014). Run-up in stock prices prior to merger & acquisitions announcements: Evidence from India. NSE Working Paper.
- Mooney, T., & Shim, H. (2015). Does financial synergy provide a rationale for conglomerate mergers? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 44(4), 537-586.
- Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1417-1426.
- Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pillania, R. K., Kumar, S., & Bansal, L. K. (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India. Management Decision.
- Ramakrishnan, K. (2008). Long-term post-merger performance of firms in India. Vikalpa, 33(2), 47-64.
- Rani, N., & Asija, A. (2017). Signalling power of corporate name change: A case of Indian firms. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18(3), 173-181.
- Rizvi, N. U., Kashiramka, S., & Singh, S. (2018). Basel I to Basel III: Impact of credit risk and interest rate risk of banks in India. Journal of Emerging Market Finance, 17(1_suppl), S83-S111.
- Roberts, M. R., & Whited, T. M. (2011). Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In G. Constantinides, M. Harris & R. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (vol. 2).
- Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
- Seth, A. (1990). Value creation in acquisitions: A re-examination of performance issues. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 99-115.
- Sharma, D. S., & Ho, J. (2002). The impact of acquisitions on operating performance: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29(1-2), 155-200.
- Sinha, N., Kaushik, K. P., & Chaudhary, T. (2010). Measuring post-merger and acquisition performance: An investigation of select financial sector organizations in India. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 2(4), 190-200.
- Switzer, J. A. (1996). Evidence on real gains in corporate acquisitions. Journal of Economics and Business, 48(5), 443-460.
- Torres-Reyna, O. (2009). Panel data analysis: Fixed & random effects: Version 3.0. Princeton University.
- Tsung-Ming, Y. E. H., & Hoshino, Y. (2002). The impact of M&As on shareholder wealth: Evidence from Taiwanese corporations. The Developing Economies, 40(4), 553-563.
- Verma, B. P., Maji, P., & Nair, S. (2013). Mergers and acquisitions and their impact on corporate values: Pre-and post-merger analysis of Indian Banks. Indian Journal of Finance, 7(2), 5-16.
- Weston, J. F., & Chung, K. S. C. (1990). Mergers, restructuring, and corporate control (No. 338.8 W5284m Ej. 1). Prentice Hall.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control function methods in applied econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420-445.
- Yeh, T. M., & Hoshino, Y. (2000). The effects of mergers and acquisitions on Taiwanese corporations. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 3(2), 183-199.