Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Technological Growth as Exponential Growth, Democratic Theory as Cultural Diffusion, and Scientific Growth as Cumulation, Diffusion, and Innovation


Affiliations
1 Department of Academic Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
 

I seek to evaluate popular claims that science and technology grow exponentially in democratic and non-democratic societies: This includes the capacity for science to grow exponentially and related questions of how to distinguish scientific growth from technological growth, including “Moore’s Law.” This paper seeks to place patterns of societal evolution in relation to each other, including scientific growth, technological growth, and how cultural diffusion and access to symbolic systems and media (access to Japanese or Chinese scripts, or Latin, Greek, or Arabic scripts, or GUIs) contribute to scientific growth and technological growth in democratic and non-democratic societies.

The paper includes a series of provocative thought experiments that seek to show that established knowledge of physics or other branches of science do not double every fifteen years to twenty years, or 20 years to 25 years, or at some other exponential rate of growth. I seek to show that the established knowledge of textbook physics, including the classical mechanics of Galileo and Newton, does not double every fifteen years to twenty years, and that, more generally, the established knowledge of different branches of science, including discoveries or sets of ideas that are considered revolutionary in nature, from Mendeleev’s Periodic Table, to Mendel’s Theory of the Particulate Nature of Genetic Inheritance, to Watson and Crick’s discovery of the double-helical structure of the DNA, does not double every fifteen years to twenty years.


Keywords

Exponential Growth, Moore's Law, Technology, Science, Culture, Democratic Societies, Non-Democratic Societies.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Szalay, A. and J. Gray, “Science in an Exponential World.” Nature. 2006. 440:413-414.
  • Wilson EO. Letters to a young scientist. WW Nort. Co. 2013.
  • Lastres HM. The advanced materials revolution and the Japanese system of innovation Springer; 2016.
  • Szalay FS and Sargis EJ. Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria. Geodiversitas, 2001;23(2):139-302.
  • Godin B. Innovation without the word: William F. Ogburn’s contribution to the study of technological innovation. Minerva. 2010.48(3):277-307.
  • Gell-Mann M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. Macmillan; 1995
  • Denning PJ and Lewis TG. Exponential laws of computing growth. Commun. ACM. 2016. 20;60(1):54-65.
  • Balakrishnan A. Analysis and optimization of global interconnects for many-core architectures (Doctoral dissertation, Ga. Inst. Technol.
  • Schaller B and Stough R. The origin, nature, and implications of Moore’s Law. 1996.
  • Ratnesh RK, Goel A, Kaushik G, at al. Advancement and challenges in MOSFET scaling. Materials Sci. Semicond. Process, 2021 1;134.
  • Courtland, R. 2015. “The Man Whose Name Means Progress.” (Interview with Gordon E. Moore) IEEE Spectrum.
  • Dubash, M. “‘Moore’s Law is Dead’, says Gordon Moore.” TechWorld.2010
  • Lewis and Denning, supra note 6.
  • Dubash, supra note 11.
  • Adams. H. “The Law of Acceleration,” in the Education of Henry Adams. New York: Mariner Books. 2000 (1907)
  • Rouse WB. Universities as complex enterprises: How academia works, why it works these ways, and where the university enterprise is headed. John Wiley Sons; 2016.
  • Eldredge N, Gould SJ. On punctuated equilibria. Science. 1997;276(5311):337-41.
  • Friedman TL. The World is Flat New York: Farrar. Straus, and Giroux. 2005;266.
  • Haque, U. The New Paradigm of Advantage. Harvard Business Review. 2010
  • Hu SJ. Evolving paradigms of manufacturing: From mass production to mass customization and personalization. Procedia Cirp. 2013;7:3-8.
  • Kroeber, A.L. 1944. Configurations of Cultural Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Abstract Views: 77

PDF Views: 0




  • Technological Growth as Exponential Growth, Democratic Theory as Cultural Diffusion, and Scientific Growth as Cumulation, Diffusion, and Innovation

Abstract Views: 77  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Christopher Portosa Stevens
Department of Academic Affairs, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States

Abstract


I seek to evaluate popular claims that science and technology grow exponentially in democratic and non-democratic societies: This includes the capacity for science to grow exponentially and related questions of how to distinguish scientific growth from technological growth, including “Moore’s Law.” This paper seeks to place patterns of societal evolution in relation to each other, including scientific growth, technological growth, and how cultural diffusion and access to symbolic systems and media (access to Japanese or Chinese scripts, or Latin, Greek, or Arabic scripts, or GUIs) contribute to scientific growth and technological growth in democratic and non-democratic societies.

The paper includes a series of provocative thought experiments that seek to show that established knowledge of physics or other branches of science do not double every fifteen years to twenty years, or 20 years to 25 years, or at some other exponential rate of growth. I seek to show that the established knowledge of textbook physics, including the classical mechanics of Galileo and Newton, does not double every fifteen years to twenty years, and that, more generally, the established knowledge of different branches of science, including discoveries or sets of ideas that are considered revolutionary in nature, from Mendeleev’s Periodic Table, to Mendel’s Theory of the Particulate Nature of Genetic Inheritance, to Watson and Crick’s discovery of the double-helical structure of the DNA, does not double every fifteen years to twenty years.


Keywords


Exponential Growth, Moore's Law, Technology, Science, Culture, Democratic Societies, Non-Democratic Societies.

References