Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Part III: The Systematic Practice of the Method of Broad Thinking on the Major Opposing Views, as the Only Way to See the Missing Facts and to adopt Functional and Wise Views for the Problems and Solutions at the Foundations of Light, Physics, Science in General, and of Society


Affiliations
1 Agora Lab, 1113 Fairview Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA., United States
 

We show here the missing way along history for growing functional, stable and wise broad views in physics, generally in science and society, instead of dysfunctional views that are based on missing facts and we show that this way brings the stability that is absolutely necessary for the inherently unstable science and society. This way is based on a systematic practice of the method for broad thinking on the major opposing views that empowers people to see the missing facts at the foundation of science and society, and to see and adopt the solutions for functional, stable and wise structures instead of ones dominated by crises, conflicts, wars, and self-destruction. This method was, long time ago, the basis for initiating the broad views of Atomism and Democracy, but was insufficiently practiced and later it was forgotten. We describe here the demonstration of this method for two major cases. One case is for the major opposing views on light in physics (a summary of Part I and Part II) which shows the missing fact at the foundation of light (how light spreads at large distances) and a mechanism-type structure for light instead of the current non-mechanism, physically impossible, structure (light spreads like waves, but nothing oscillates). In the second case the demonstration is for the opposing views of liberals and conservatives in society which shows the missing system at the foundation of society – the system for growing common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views, individual and society. These cases and demonstrations are important enough to show that this method can and must be systematically practiced in physics/ science and especially in society. Learning this method and these two demonstrations turns on the necessary “light” in physics and in society, and becomes the basis for a systematic practice of this method. This is necessary because, as M.L. King said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.” Therefore, in our time a system for spreading the concept and the practice of this simple method is absolutely necessary, such that this method becomes a habit for the regular individual and society. Indeed, in this model the individual and the society see the big-picture knowledge for growing functional common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views, science and society, instead of poor views, division, conflicts, wars, and self-destruction. Without this big-picture people, science and society live in darkness. We show here that such a system is easy feasible based on simple requirements in the science activity and in the Constitution of society. In our time this method can and must be practiced systematically to define and adopt a system for growing functional common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views instead of poor views, division, etc.

Keywords

Method for Broad Thinking; Major Opposing Views; Functional, Stable and Wise Broad Views; Individual, Science and Society.
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Costescu C.I., Costescu R.M., Costescu D.M, “Towards a mechanism-type structure for light, Part I. The crucial verification of how light spreads at large distances, experimental design, non-wave results and consequences for light, gravity, generally for physics.”, J. Phys. Astron.2022;10(11):1-23.
  • Costescu C.I., “Part II: The Feasibility and the Consequences of a Mechanism-Type Structure for Light Based on a NonWave but Periodic Spreading in Free Space.”, J. Phys. Astron.2022;10(12):1-26.
  • Goodman JW. Introduction to Fourier optics. Roberts Co. publ.2005.
  • Yariv A. Quantum electronics. John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
  • Paul A. Tippler, “Physics”, Third Edition, Worth Publishers, NY, 1991;2.
  • Borovikov VA, Borovikov VA, Kinber BY, et al. Geometrical theory of diffraction. Iet; 1994.
  • James GL. Geometrical theory of diffraction for electromagnetic waves. IET; 1986.
  • Ebbesen TW, Lezec HJ, Ghaemi HF, et al. Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays. nature. 1998;391(6668):667-9.
  • Yi JM, Cuche A, de León-Pérez F, et al. Diffraction regimes of single holes. Phys. rev. lett. 2012;109(2):023901.
  • Drutman L. “America is now the Divided Republic the Framers Feared” The Atlantic. 2020.
  • Rauch J. “American Politics went Insane”. The Atlantic. 2016.
  • Ali N. “How U.S political parties formed and changed over time”. The Cerebrum.2017.
  • Cassam Q. “Simplistic thinkers or bad thinkers.” Pocket Worthy. 2014
  • Keya C. “The habit poem”. Ventura Healing Center.2020

Abstract Views: 98

PDF Views: 0




  • Part III: The Systematic Practice of the Method of Broad Thinking on the Major Opposing Views, as the Only Way to See the Missing Facts and to adopt Functional and Wise Views for the Problems and Solutions at the Foundations of Light, Physics, Science in General, and of Society

Abstract Views: 98  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Corneliu I. Costescu
Agora Lab, 1113 Fairview Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA., United States

Abstract


We show here the missing way along history for growing functional, stable and wise broad views in physics, generally in science and society, instead of dysfunctional views that are based on missing facts and we show that this way brings the stability that is absolutely necessary for the inherently unstable science and society. This way is based on a systematic practice of the method for broad thinking on the major opposing views that empowers people to see the missing facts at the foundation of science and society, and to see and adopt the solutions for functional, stable and wise structures instead of ones dominated by crises, conflicts, wars, and self-destruction. This method was, long time ago, the basis for initiating the broad views of Atomism and Democracy, but was insufficiently practiced and later it was forgotten. We describe here the demonstration of this method for two major cases. One case is for the major opposing views on light in physics (a summary of Part I and Part II) which shows the missing fact at the foundation of light (how light spreads at large distances) and a mechanism-type structure for light instead of the current non-mechanism, physically impossible, structure (light spreads like waves, but nothing oscillates). In the second case the demonstration is for the opposing views of liberals and conservatives in society which shows the missing system at the foundation of society – the system for growing common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views, individual and society. These cases and demonstrations are important enough to show that this method can and must be systematically practiced in physics/ science and especially in society. Learning this method and these two demonstrations turns on the necessary “light” in physics and in society, and becomes the basis for a systematic practice of this method. This is necessary because, as M.L. King said, “Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only light can do that.” Therefore, in our time a system for spreading the concept and the practice of this simple method is absolutely necessary, such that this method becomes a habit for the regular individual and society. Indeed, in this model the individual and the society see the big-picture knowledge for growing functional common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views, science and society, instead of poor views, division, conflicts, wars, and self-destruction. Without this big-picture people, science and society live in darkness. We show here that such a system is easy feasible based on simple requirements in the science activity and in the Constitution of society. In our time this method can and must be practiced systematically to define and adopt a system for growing functional common ground and functional, stable and wise broad views instead of poor views, division, etc.

Keywords


Method for Broad Thinking; Major Opposing Views; Functional, Stable and Wise Broad Views; Individual, Science and Society.

References