Journal of Indian School of Political Economy

Archana R. Dholakia ¹, Ravindra H. Dholakia ²

Affiliations
1 School of Social Sciences, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, IN
2 Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad-380015, IN

Abstract

It is hypothesised that the tax revenues of a state economy would be sensitive to the macroeconomic performance of the state economy measured in terms of inflation and the growth of real income. The case of Gujarat state over the period 1980-81 to 1997-98 is considered for examining this hypothesis. The time trends of the state's tax revenue, GSDP and implicit deflator are estimated and relatively high instability of the growth of both nominal and real income in the state is brought out. The methodology used by the Tenth Finance Commission to estimate the buoyancy of the tax revenues of the states ignored the unit ischolar_main problems in using the level variables with strong time trends. Since the Commission has also not tested for cointegration of the regressions used, it has generated spurious correlations and meaningless estimates of the tax buoyancy for different states. In order to get a more realistic, acceptable and analytically usable estimate of the tax buoyancy in Gujarat, annual rates of growth in the variables are used in the regressions which amount to using the first difference in the double-log form. Moreover, the hypothesis of uniform marginal buoyancy of tax collection for inflation and real output growth is also tested for Gujarat. The argument about tax rebates and incentives contributing to the future growth of output and hence to the future tax collection is also examined. The data on Gujarat do not appear to support such causal links of the tax incentives and future growth of the economy. Very low tax buoyancy indicates serious problems with the tax administration and tax system in the state.

Full Text

     

Archana R. Dholakia ¹

Affiliations
1 Economics at the School of Social Sciences Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, IN

Abstract

The role played by the Centre through transfer of budgetary resources in determining the States’ fiscal performance is discussed with reference to Gujarat State. Over the past two decades, the State’s fiscal performance varies according to the effective period of different Finance Commissions. The Centre has first created a fiscal crisis in Gujarat and then helped the State to achieve a turn-around. The State has responded well to the Centre’s incentives. But since the Centre has not provided proper incentives, the State has failed to control its unproductive revenue expenditures which constitute a critical element in the fiscal discipline.

Full Text