Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Demonetisation and Indian Economy:Some Macroeconomic Challenges


Affiliations
1 Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi-110070, India
2 Institute for Studies Industrial Development, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The macroeconomic implications of the "Demonetisation" exercise has been studied on three board parameters of growth, distributional consequences, and the challenges it brought in for the Banking Sector. Concomitantly, an attempt has been made to evaluate the extent to which the stated objectives behind this exercise are justified. We found that it is beyond dispute as far as the immediate impact on growth is concerned. Given the size of the informal economy and the fact that India has been a cash driven economy, contraction in output during 2016-17 fiscal was inevitable. Other than the growth challenge, the Demonetisation exercise throws a far more important challenge bearing distributional consequences. The new interest rate regime that emerged during the post demonetisation period is likely to benefit some while leaving a large chunk of population worse off. Finally, the banks will find it difficult to manage the liquidity surge in the system. With increase in deposit growth and a decline in credit growth, it would be difficult for banks to manage their liabilities. The evaluation of its stated objectives suggests that it does not justify such a mammoth exercise, which is cost intensive and bears serious adversarial economic consequences. We have not endeavoured to examine the likely/claimed long term gains from the Income Tax authorities being able to track the addresses of the currency which has flowed into the banking system.

Keywords

Demonetisation, Economic Growth, Indian Economy, Banking Sector.
User
Subscription Login to verify subscription
Notifications
Font Size

  • CMIE, 2017; ‘Quarterly CapeEx Aggregates’, Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy. Available at: https://www.cmie.com; accessed on March 7.
  • Dasgupta, Dipankar, 2016; ‘Theoretical Analysis of ‘Demonetization’’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 51.
  • Ghandy, K., 2016; ‘Demonetisation: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 50.
  • GOI, 2012; ‘White Paper on Black Money’, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Available at: www.finmin.nic.in/reports/WhitePaper_BackMoney2012.pdf
  • GOI, 2016; ‘The Gazette of India published as "Extraordinary" in PARTII-Section 3-Sub-section (ii) under reference NO. 2652’, dated November 8.
  • GOI, 2017; Economic Survey 2016-17, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
  • ILO, 2016; India Labour Market Update, July, (http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---sronew_delhi/documents/publication/wcms_496510.pdf) access on November 30, 2017.
  • IMF, 2017; World Economic Outlook, International Monetary Fund.
  • Kumar, 2016; ‘Estimation of the Size of the Black Economy in India, 1996-2012’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 48.
  • Kumar, A., 2017; ‘Economic Consequences of Demonetisation: Money Supply and Economic Structure’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 52, No. 1.
  • Labour Bureau, Employment - Unemployment Survey, 2015-16.
  • Lahiri, A.K., 2016; ‘Demonetisation, the Cash Shortage and the Black Economy’, NIPFP Working Paper No. 184, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, December.
  • NIPFP, 2016; ‘Demonetisation: Impact on the Economy’, RNIPFP Working Paper No. 182, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, November.
  • Rajkumar, J.D. and S.L. Shetty, 2016; ‘Demonetisation: 1978, the Present and the Aftermath’, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 48.
  • RBI, (undated), Annual Report, various years.
  • RBI, 2016; ‘Withdrawal of Legal Tender Character of Existing Rs. 500/- and Rs. 1,000/- Bank Notes’, RBI Notification No. RBI:2016-17/112 (DCM(Plg) No.1226/10.27.00 /2016-17) dated November 08.
  • RBI, 2016; Consumer Confidence Survey, December.
  • RBI, 2016; Fifth Bi-Monthly Monetary Policy Statement, 2016-17. (December 07, 2016)
  • RBI, 2016; Press release on ‘Reserve Money for the Week Ended December 30, and Money Supply for the Fortnight Ended December 23’, Reserve Bank of India.
  • RBI, 2017; Industrial Outlook Survey, 76th Round, January.
  • RBI, Handbook of Statistics on Indian Economy.
  • Sundaram,K and V. Pandit, 1976; ‘On Black Money’, Indian Economic Review, Vol. 11, No. 2.
  • World Bank, 2016; Global Economic Prospects: Divergences and Risks, June.

Abstract Views: 228

PDF Views: 4




  • Demonetisation and Indian Economy:Some Macroeconomic Challenges

Abstract Views: 228  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Santosh Kumar Das
Institute for Studies in Industrial Development, New Delhi-110070, India
Pradyuman Singh Rawat
Institute for Studies Industrial Development, New Delhi, India

Abstract


The macroeconomic implications of the "Demonetisation" exercise has been studied on three board parameters of growth, distributional consequences, and the challenges it brought in for the Banking Sector. Concomitantly, an attempt has been made to evaluate the extent to which the stated objectives behind this exercise are justified. We found that it is beyond dispute as far as the immediate impact on growth is concerned. Given the size of the informal economy and the fact that India has been a cash driven economy, contraction in output during 2016-17 fiscal was inevitable. Other than the growth challenge, the Demonetisation exercise throws a far more important challenge bearing distributional consequences. The new interest rate regime that emerged during the post demonetisation period is likely to benefit some while leaving a large chunk of population worse off. Finally, the banks will find it difficult to manage the liquidity surge in the system. With increase in deposit growth and a decline in credit growth, it would be difficult for banks to manage their liabilities. The evaluation of its stated objectives suggests that it does not justify such a mammoth exercise, which is cost intensive and bears serious adversarial economic consequences. We have not endeavoured to examine the likely/claimed long term gains from the Income Tax authorities being able to track the addresses of the currency which has flowed into the banking system.

Keywords


Demonetisation, Economic Growth, Indian Economy, Banking Sector.

References