Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Vargas-Hernandez, Jose G.
- Collaborative Economies Business Model:Uber Strategies for Transport Incorporated Private Market
Abstract Views :420 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Administration, University Center for Economics and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara Periferico Norte 799 Edificio G-201-7, NucleoUniversitario Los Belenes CUCEA, Zapopan, Jalisco C.P. 45100, MX
1 Department of Administration, University Center for Economics and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara Periferico Norte 799 Edificio G-201-7, NucleoUniversitario Los Belenes CUCEA, Zapopan, Jalisco C.P. 45100, MX
Source
Jaipuria International Journal of Management Research, Vol 3, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 3-9Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze the different strategies that take Uber to join the global market successfully, positioning itself in different countries and analyze how come these businesses and strategies that Uber is doing become successful not just in one city but in several countries around the world. In order to accomplish this, it is necessary to go through previous literature on collaborative economies business model that is appropriate to identify the different theories that may be applicable in this context.Keywords
Technology-Based, Global Strategy, Globalization, Innovation, Work Global.
References
- Bostman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What's mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Business.
- Canals, J. (1994). La internacionalización de la empresa. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
- Canigueral, A. (2015). Consumocolaborativo. Leaners Magazine, pp. 18-22.
- Carbaugh, R. J. (2005). La globalización de la actividadeconómica. En R. J. Carbaugh, EconomíaInternacional. Thompson. pp. 4-8.
- Chafkin, M. (12 de 1 de 2016). Fast Company. Obtenido de Fastcompany.com: http://www.fastcompany.com/3054873/can-airbnb-unite-the-world
- Christensen, C., & Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator's solution: creating and sustaining successful growth . Boston: Harvard Business Press.
- Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsability of Business Is to Increase Profits. The New York Times Magazine, Septiembre 13.
- INEGI (2010). Mexico encifras. Recuperado de http://www.inegi.org.mx/Censos.
- Interian, J. (2016). Up in the air: harmonizing economy through airbnb regulations. Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, pp. 129-161.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional Change, and economic performance. New york Norton.
- North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, University Press.
- Peng M. W (2012). Estrategia global. México: Cengage Learning.
- Peng, M. W (2000), Business strategies in transition EconomiesThousand oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 42-44.
- Rifkin, J. (2014). La sociedad de coste marginal cero: el internet de las cosas, el procomúncolaborativo y el eclipse del capitalismo. Barcelona: Paidos.
- Russo, A., & Quaglieri, A. (2014). La lógicaespacial del intercambio de casas: unaaproximación a las nuevasgeografias de lo cotidianoen el turismocontemporáneo. Revistaelectrónica de georgrafía y cienciassociales., pp. 324-331.
- Streitfeld, D. (15 de Octubre de 2014). Airbnb listing mostly illegal .New York Times.
- Uber (2016). UBER. Recuperadodehttps://www.uber.com
- Urbado, D., Diaz, J., & Hernandez, R. (2007). Evolucion y principios de la teoríaeconómicainstitucional. Unapropuesta de aplicación para el análisis de losfactorescondicionantes de la creación de empresas. InvestigacionesEuropeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13(3), pp. 183-198.
- Veblen, T. (1965). La teoria der la empresa de negocios, Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
- Villarreal, O. (2005). La internacionalizacion de la empresa y la empresamultinacional: unarevision conceptual contemporánea. Cuadernos de Gestión, 5(2), pp. 55-73
- Wen, I. (2009). Factors affecting the online travel buying decision: a review. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, pp. 752-765.
- Analysis of the Perception of Belonging and the Commitment to the Generational Transition
Abstract Views :471 |
PDF Views:3
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Administration, University Center for economic and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara Periferico Norte 799 Edificio G-201-7, Nucleo Universitario Los Belenes, Zapopan, Jalisco C.P. 45100, MX
2 Ciencias AdministrativasUniversidad Cristobal Colon, Zapata 80, Col Flores Magon.Veracruz, Ver. CP 91900, MX
1 Department of Administration, University Center for economic and Managerial Sciences, University of Guadalajara Periferico Norte 799 Edificio G-201-7, Nucleo Universitario Los Belenes, Zapopan, Jalisco C.P. 45100, MX
2 Ciencias AdministrativasUniversidad Cristobal Colon, Zapata 80, Col Flores Magon.Veracruz, Ver. CP 91900, MX
Source
Jaipuria International Journal of Management Research, Vol 5, No 1 (2019), Pagination: 3-20Abstract
Generational succession is an issue that is of vital importance in family businesses, since the permanence of the company depends on the success of the process. All the steps to follow, as well as the literature on the subject, are studied in the case presented, which is limited to a consortium of companies dedicated to foreign trade, whose corporate is located in the city of Veracruz, with 30 years in the market and that is in the process of transition from the Council Presidency of the father to his son. The analysis includes the existing generational differences in Key words: Generational Succession, Likert Scale, Millennial Generation, Baby Boomer Generation, Generation X Analysis of the Perception of Belonging and the Commitment to the Generational Transition the way of thinking and therefore in the way of managing several companies on which more than 600 employees depend and seeks to identify if there are some variables that ensure the success of a generational succession process..Keywords
Generational Succession, Likert Scale, Millennial Generation, Baby Boomer Generation, Generation X.References
- Araya, A. (2011). La sucesion de empresas familiares costarricen¬ses: factores de exito y fracaso. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Va¬lencia, Espana.
- Aronoff, C.E. & Ward, J.L. (1995). Family-owned businesses: A thing of the past or a model for the future? Family Business Review, 8: 121- 130.
- Belausteguigoitia, I. (2010). Empresas familiares, su dinamica, equilibrio yconsolidación. México, D.F.: Mc GrawHill.
- Cabrera, K. (1998). Factores determinantes del éxito y fracaso del proceso de sucesión en la empresa familiar(Tesis Doctoral). Recuperado de la base de datos de la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria. España 1998.
- Chittoor, R. & Das, R. (2007). Professionalization of management and succession performance – a vital linkage. Family Business Review, 20(l), 65-79.
- Chrisman, J., Chua, J. & Sharma, P. (1998). Important attributes of successors in family businesses: an exploratory study. Family Business Review, 11(1), 19-34.
- Friedman, M. & Friedman, S. (1994). How to run a family business. Cincinnati,Ohio: Beterway Books.
- Gallo, M. (1995). Empresa familiar: Textos y casos. Barcelona: Editorial Praxis.
- García-Tenorio, J. y Perez, M. (2009). El relevo generacional y la estrategia derecursos humanos en la empresa familiar. Recuperado de la base de datos de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. España 2009.
- Handler, W. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process: The next- generation family member´s experience. UMI Disserta¬tion Services.
- Handler, W.(1994). Succession in family business: A review of the research. FamilyBusiness Review, 7:133-157.
- Herrera, G. (2012). Relacion entre sentido de pertenencia y estabilidad laboral. Tesis inédita. Universidad Rafael Landivar. Guatemala
- Jurado, A (2014). Los niveles de sentido de pertenencia en un grupo de profesionales bajo contratación laboral simulada en distintas organizaciones guatemaltecas. Universidad Rafael Landivar. Guatemala.
- Leach, P. (1993). La empresa familiar. Barcelona: Ediciones Gra¬nica.
- Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics: Concept, method, and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Retrieved from Sage Journals: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001872674700100103
- Longenecker, J., Moore, C. & Petty, W. (2001). Administración de pequeñasempresas. México: Thomson Learning.
- Nelton, S. (1993). Why don’t we dish the dirt. Family business Review.. E.U.A.: pp.81, 61.
- Oviedo, G. (2004). La definición del concepto de percepción en psicología con baseen la Teoría Gestalt. Revista de Estudios Sociales. No 18. Bogotá, Colombia. Mayo/Agosto 2004.
- PricewaterhouseCoopers, Instituto de la Empresa Familiar y Red de Cátedras delIEF (2007): Políticas de Capital humano en la Empresa Familiar, Documento 142 del IEF.
- Quijano, R., Magana, D. & Perez, C. (2011). Pertenencia y compromiso: factoresrelevantes en la transición generacional de empresas familiares. Caso constructoras Campeche, Mexico. Estudios Gerenciales, 27 (121), 99-114. Recuperado dehttps://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/estudios_gerenciales/article/view/1119.
- Sharma, P. e Irving, G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.Documento 29(1), 13-33.
- Ussman, A. (2004). Empresas Familiares. Lisboa: Editorial Silabo.
- Vallejo, M. (2007). El compromiso de la empresa familiar bajo una óptica de liderazgo transformacional y aprendizaje organizacional. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13 (3), 217-234.
- Vancil, R. (1987). Passing the batan: Managing the process of CEO succession. MA, Estados Unidos. Harvard Business School Press.
- Vilaseca, A. (2002). The shareholder role in the family business: conflict of interests and objectives between nonemployed shareholders and top management team. Family Business Review, 15(4), 299-320.