Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chakraborty, Subrata
- Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice:What Happened to Management Research?
Abstract Views :256 |
PDF Views:132
Authors
Affiliations
1 Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, IN
1 Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow, IN
Source
Journal of Applied Management- Jidnyasa, Vol 8, No 2 (2016), Pagination: 63-67Abstract
“Out of Focus or Inappropriate Paradigm Choice: What Happened to Management Research?” was published as a discussion article in Jidnyasa – Journal of Applied Management, 8(1) 2016 on which two commentaries – one by Dr. Kuldeep Kumar and the other by Dr. Ritika Mahajan – were published in Jidnyasa 8(2) 2016. Since no further commentary was received subsequently it was decided to close the discussion with a response from the author of the original article.Full Text
References
- 1. Aldag, R. J. and S. R. Fuller (1995). 'Research Advisory Boards to Facilitate Organizational Research', Journal of Management Inquiry, 4, pp. 41—51.
- Hodgkinson, G, P, and P. Herriot (2002), The Role of Psychologists in Enhancing Organizational Effectiveness. In: I, T. Robertson, M. Callinan and D. Bartram (eds). Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 45-60.
- Levitt, M. A. (1996). Research can be a Pain in the Neck. Academic Emergency Medicine, 3, pp 563 -564.
- Michel, Berry. (1995) Research and the Practice of Management: A French View. Organization Science 6(1): 104-116.
- Omerod, Richard (1996). On the Nature of OR – Entering the Fray. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47, pp 1 – 17.
- Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). The Double Hurdles for Management Research. In: T. Clark (ed.). Advancement in Organizational Behavior: Essays in Honour of Derek S. Pugh. Ashgate, Hants.
- Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, pp 599 – 620.
- Porter, L. W. and Mckibbin, L.E. (1998). Management Education and Development: Drift or Thrust into 21st Century. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Schon, D. A. (1995). 'The New Scholarship Requires a New Epistemology', Change, 27, pp. 26-35.
- Shrivastava, P. and I. I. Mitroff (1984). 'Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers' Assumptions', Academy of Management Review, 9, pp. 18-26.
- Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
- Tsoukas, H. (1994). Refining Common Sense: Types of Knowledge in Management Studies. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), pp 761 – 780.
- Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
- Whitley, R. (1984). The Scientific Status of Management Research as a Practically Oriented Social Science. Journal of Management Studies, 21(4), pp 369 – 390.
- Have We Come in the Grip of ‘Managerialism’?
Abstract Views :163 |
PDF Views:99
Authors
Affiliations
1 IIM, Lucknow, Former Director, Jaipuria Institute of Management, Lucknow, IN
1 IIM, Lucknow, Former Director, Jaipuria Institute of Management, Lucknow, IN
Source
Journal of Applied Management- Jidnyasa, Vol 12, No 1 (2020), Pagination: 60-65Abstract
No Abstract.Full Text
References
- Cunliffe, A.L. (2014). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about management (2nd ed.), SAGE, Los Angeles,
- Drucker, Peter (1973). Management: tasks, responsibilities, practices. New York: Harper & Row.
- Hvenmark, J. (2015). Ideology, practice, and process? A review of the concept of managerialism in civil society studies. Voluntas. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s11266-015-9605-z
- Johnson, H. T. (1978). “Management Accounting in an Early Multidivisional Organization: General Motors in the 1920s.” Business History Review: 52:4 (Winter 1978), 490-513.
- Johnson, H. T. (1994). Relevance Regained: Total Quality Management and the Role of Management Accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5(2), 259 – 267.
- Johnson, H. T. and Bro ̈ms, A. (2000). Profit Beyond Measure: Extraordinary Results through Attention to Process and People. Boston: Nicolas Breakley Publishing.
- Johnson, H. Thomas; Kaplan, Robert S (1987). The Rise and fall of Management Accounting. Management Accounting: 68, 7
- Kaplan, Robert S., and H. Thomas Johnson (1987). Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1987.
- Klikauer T (2010). Critical Management Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Klikauer, Thomas (2013). Managerialism : A Critique of an Ideology . Palgrave Macmillan, Basingtoke, UK
- . Klikauer, Thomas (2015). What Is Managerialism? Critical Sociology: 41(7-8), 1103–1119.
- Locke, R. R. (2009). Managerialism and the demise of the big three. Real- World Economics Review, 51, 28–47.
- Locke R and Spender J (2011). Confronting Managerialism: How the Business Elite and Their Schools Threw Our Lives Out of Balance. London: Zed Books.
- Mitchell, G.E. (2016). Modalities of Managerialism: The “Double Bind”of Normative and Instrumental Nonprofit Management Imperatives. Administration & Society 1–32
- Patterson, S. (2010). The Quants: How a Small Band of Maths Wizards Took over Wall Street and Nearly Destroyed It. New York: Random House Business Books.
- Roberts, S. M., Jones, J. P., III, & Frohling, O. (2005). NGOs and the globalization of managerialism: A research framework. World Development, 33, 1845-1864.
- Taleb, N. N. (2001). Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets (2nded.). New York: Random House.