Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Study of Provenance Characteristics and Depositional History on the Basis of U, Th and K Abundances in the Gulcheru Formation, Cuddapah Basin in Tummalapalle-Somalollapalle Areas, Cuddapah-Anantapur Districts, Andhra Pradesh


Affiliations
1 Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Hyderabad - 500 016, India
2 Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Jamshedpur - 831 002, India
3 Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Bangalore - 560 072, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Provenance studies on the basis of U, Th and K reveal that the sediments of the Gulcheru Formation were derived from a minor heterogeneous but dominantly granitoid provenance, which often underwent moderate chemical weathering. Mixing of reworked and heavy mineral bearing matured sediments with newly generated detritus took place at different times. Sedimentation took place in three different phases. Initially the sediments were deposited in fluvioaeolian environment. Later, subsidence of the depo-centre along basinal growth faults led to the transgression of seawater over earlier sediments. The last phase of the sedimentation history continued in the marginal marine domain. The depocentre most possibly experienced semi-arid climate.

Keywords

U, Th And K Abundances, Provenance Characteristics, Depositional History, Gulcheru Formation, Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • ADAMS, J.A.S. and WEAVER, E. (1958) Thorium to uranium ratios as indicators of sedimentary process: example of concept of geochemical facies. AAPG Bull., v.42, pp.387-430.
  • BASU, H. (2007) Geological and geochemical aspects of The Gulcheru Formation in the southwestern margin of the Cuddapah Basin and its potentiality for Uranium Mineralization. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.70, No.4, pp.686-688.
  • BASU, H., GANGADHARAN, G.R., KUMAR, S., SHARMA, U.P., RAI, A.K. and CHAKI, A. (2007) Sedimentary Facies of The Gulcheru Quartzite in the Southwestern Part of the Cuddapah Basin and their Implication in Deciphering the Depositional Environment. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.69, pp.347-358.
  • BAULUZ, B., MAYAYO, M.J., FERNANDEZ-NIETO, C. and GONZALEZ LOPEZ, J.M. (2000) Geochemistry of Precambrian and Palaeozoic siliciclastic rocks from the Iberian Range (NE Spain): implications for source-area weathering, sorting, provenance, and tectonic setting. Chem. Geol., v.168, pp.135-150.
  • BHAT, M.I. and GHOSH, S.K. (2001) Geochemistry of 2.51 Ga old Rampura Group pelites, western Himalayas: implications for their provenance and weathering. Precambrian Res., v.108, pp.1-16.
  • BHATIA, M.R. (1983) Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones. Jour. Geol., v.91, pp.611-627.
  • BOYLE, R.W. (1982) Geochemical prospecting for thorium and uranium deposits. Dev. Econ. Geol., Elsevier, Netherlands, 16, 498p.
  • CONDIE, K.C. (1991) Another look at rare earth elements in shales. Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta, v.35, pp.2527-2531.
  • CONDIE, K.C. (1993) Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: contrasting results from surface samples and shales. Chem. Geol., v.104, pp.1-37.
  • DOVETON, J.D. (1991) Lithofacies and geochemical facies profiles from nuclear wireline logs: new subsurface templates for sedimentary modelling. In: E.K. Franseen, W.L. Watney, C.J. Kendall and W. Ross (Eds.), Sedimentary modelling-computer simulations and methods for improved parameter definition. Kansas Geol. Soc. Bull., v.233, pp.101-110.
  • FEDO, C.M., NESBITT, H.W. and YOUNG, G.M. (1995) Unraveling the effects of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications for palaeoweathering conditions and provenance. Sedimentology, v.23, pp.921-924.
  • HASSAN, M., HOSSIN, A. and COMBAZ, A. (1976) Fundamentals of the differential gamma ray log interpretation technique. SPWLA 17th Ann. Symp., Pap.8, pp.1-7.
  • IAEA TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES (1992) Analytical Techniques in Uranium Exploration and Ore Processing. Report No. 341, 187p.
  • KALE, V.S. (1995) Association of the Purana basins and the Middle Proterozoic mobile belts in Peninsular India: implications on targeting uranium deposits. EARFAM. v.8, pp.95-110.
  • KOBRANOVA, V. N. (1989) Petrophysics. Springer Verlag, 375p.
  • MCLENNAN, S.M. (1989) Rare earth elements in sedimentary rocks: Influence of provenance and sedimentary processes. In: B.R. Lipin and G.A. McKay (Eds.), Geochemistry and Mineralogy of REE. Reviews in Mineralogy, v.2, pp.169-200.
  • MCLENNAN, S.M., HEMMING, S., MCDANIEL, D.K. andHANSON, G.N. (1993) Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance and tectonics. In: M.J. Johnson and A. Basu (Eds.), Processes Controlling the Composition of Clastic Sediments. Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Paper No.284, pp.21-40.
  • MCLENNAN, S.M., HEMMING, S., TAYLOR, S.R. and ERIKSON, K.A. (1995) Early Proterozoic crustal evolution: Geochemical and Nd-Pb isotopic evidence from metasedimentary rocks southwestern North America. Geochem. Cosmochem. Acta, v.59, pp.1153-1177.
  • MYERS, K.J. and WIGNALL, P.B. (1987) Understanding Jurassic organic-rich mudrocks - new concepts using gamma-ray spectrometry and palaeoecology: examples from the Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset and the Jet Rock of Yorkshire. In: J.K. Leggett and G.G. Zuffa (Eds.), Marine clastic sedimentology: concepts and case studies: a volume in memory of C. Tarquin Teale. Graham and Trotman, London, pp.172-189.
  • NAQVI, S.M., SAWKAR, R.H., SUBBA RAO, D., GOVIL, P.K. and RAO, T.G. (1988) Geology, geochemistry and tectonic setting of Archaean Greywacke from Karnataka nucleus, India. Precambrian Res., v.39, pp.193-216.
  • PETTIJOHN, F.J. (1957) Sedimentary rocks. Harper and Row, New York, 718p.
  • RAZA, M., CASSHYAP, S.M. and KHAN, A. (2002) Geochemistry of Mesoproterozoic Lower Vindhyan Shales from Chittaurgarh, Southeastern Rajasthan and its bearing on source rock composition, palaeoweathering conditions and tectonosedimentary environments. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.60, pp.505-518.
  • REDDY, V.P., REDDY, N.S. and PRASAD, C.V.R.K. (1990) Quartzites of the Cuddapah Group and their environment of deposition. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, v.35, pp.408-420.
  • RIDER, M. (1996) The Geological Interpretation of Well Logs. Gulf Publishing Company, pp.67-90.
  • ROUT, G.B. (2002) Radiometric measurements. In: R. Sreehari and C.V.R. Sarma (Eds.), Orientation Course for Physicists, AMD, Hyderabad. T-25, 125p.
  • TAYLOR, S.R. andMCLENNAN, S.M. (1985) The Continental Crust: Its Composition and Evolution. Blackwell, London, 311p.
  • VAN BUCHEM, F.S.P., MELNYK, D.H. and MCCAVE, I.N. (1992) Chemical cyclicity and correlation of Lower Lias mudstones using gamma ray logs, Yorkshire, UK. Jour. Geol. Soc., v.149, pp.991-1002.
  • WRIGHT, J.S. (2004) The role of weathering in the production of quartz silt. International Workshop HWK Delmenhorst 'From Particle Size to Sediment Dynamics', pp.154-158.
  • ZELT, F.B. (1985) Paleoceanographic events and lithologic/geochemical facies of the Greenhorn marine event (Upper Cretaceous) examined using natural gamma-ray spectrometry. In: L. Pratt, E.G. Kaufmann and F.B. Zelt (Eds.), Fine-grained deposits and biofacies of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway - evidence of cyclic sedimentary processes. Soc. Econ. Paleonto. Mineral., SEPM Field Trip Guidebook No.4. Golden, Colorado, pp.49-59.

Abstract Views: 221

PDF Views: 0




  • Study of Provenance Characteristics and Depositional History on the Basis of U, Th and K Abundances in the Gulcheru Formation, Cuddapah Basin in Tummalapalle-Somalollapalle Areas, Cuddapah-Anantapur Districts, Andhra Pradesh

Abstract Views: 221  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Himadri Basu
Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Hyderabad - 500 016, India
K. Mahendra Kumar
Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Jamshedpur - 831 002, India
S. Paneerselvam
Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Bangalore - 560 072, India
A. Chaki
Atomic Minerals Directorate for Exploration and Research, Hyderabad - 500 016, India

Abstract


Provenance studies on the basis of U, Th and K reveal that the sediments of the Gulcheru Formation were derived from a minor heterogeneous but dominantly granitoid provenance, which often underwent moderate chemical weathering. Mixing of reworked and heavy mineral bearing matured sediments with newly generated detritus took place at different times. Sedimentation took place in three different phases. Initially the sediments were deposited in fluvioaeolian environment. Later, subsidence of the depo-centre along basinal growth faults led to the transgression of seawater over earlier sediments. The last phase of the sedimentation history continued in the marginal marine domain. The depocentre most possibly experienced semi-arid climate.

Keywords


U, Th And K Abundances, Provenance Characteristics, Depositional History, Gulcheru Formation, Cuddapah Basin, Andhra Pradesh.

References