Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Iron Formations in Archaean Granulite-Gneiss Belts With Special Reference to Southern India


Affiliations
1 Department of Geology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Department of Geology, The University, Leicester LEI 7RH, United Kingdom
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


In Archaean granulite-gneiss belts there are banded iron formations (BIF) less than 20m thick which are weakly banded magnetite quartzites occurring in a supracrustal sequence of quartzites, mica schists, marbles and metavolcanic amphibolites. This sequence forms stratigraphic markers within voluminous intrusive tonalitic to trondbjemitic gneisses. These rocks are highly folded and metamorphosed to high amphibolite or granulite facies at 7-12 kb pressure in the lower Archaean crust. Such iron formations are well represented in Tamil Nadu, Southern Karnataka, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh in South India; in Hebei Province in China; Kola Peninsula, Stanovoy Range, and Ukraine in USSR; Kambui schists of Sierra Leone; Nimba series of Liberia; Limpopo belt of southern Africa; Imataca complex of Venezuela; Uivak gneisses of Labrador; and Amitsoq gneisses of West Greenland. They are obviously different in type and environment from the Proterozoic Superior type of BIF; it is shown here how they are different from the Archaean Algoma type of BIF. They were deposited in a quartzite-pelite-carbonate association and they lack the silicate-carbopate-sulphide facies of the Algoma-type which, in contrast, was deposited with a greywacke-flyschconglomerate- shale association in subsiding basins (Greenstone belts). Because they are dissimilar to the Algoma-type of BIF in both their sedimentary facies and tectonic environment (the granulite-gneiss belts are not highly metamorphosed greenstone belts), they should be given a separate status and we tentatively suggest they be termed the Tamil Nadu type.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 174

PDF Views: 2




  • Iron Formations in Archaean Granulite-Gneiss Belts With Special Reference to Southern India

Abstract Views: 174  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

C. V. R. K. Prasad
Department of Geology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
N. Subba Reddy
Department of Geology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati 517 502, Andhra Pradesh, India
B. F. Windley
Department of Geology, The University, Leicester LEI 7RH, United Kingdom

Abstract


In Archaean granulite-gneiss belts there are banded iron formations (BIF) less than 20m thick which are weakly banded magnetite quartzites occurring in a supracrustal sequence of quartzites, mica schists, marbles and metavolcanic amphibolites. This sequence forms stratigraphic markers within voluminous intrusive tonalitic to trondbjemitic gneisses. These rocks are highly folded and metamorphosed to high amphibolite or granulite facies at 7-12 kb pressure in the lower Archaean crust. Such iron formations are well represented in Tamil Nadu, Southern Karnataka, Kerala and Andhra Pradesh in South India; in Hebei Province in China; Kola Peninsula, Stanovoy Range, and Ukraine in USSR; Kambui schists of Sierra Leone; Nimba series of Liberia; Limpopo belt of southern Africa; Imataca complex of Venezuela; Uivak gneisses of Labrador; and Amitsoq gneisses of West Greenland. They are obviously different in type and environment from the Proterozoic Superior type of BIF; it is shown here how they are different from the Archaean Algoma type of BIF. They were deposited in a quartzite-pelite-carbonate association and they lack the silicate-carbopate-sulphide facies of the Algoma-type which, in contrast, was deposited with a greywacke-flyschconglomerate- shale association in subsiding basins (Greenstone belts). Because they are dissimilar to the Algoma-type of BIF in both their sedimentary facies and tectonic environment (the granulite-gneiss belts are not highly metamorphosed greenstone belts), they should be given a separate status and we tentatively suggest they be termed the Tamil Nadu type.