Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Application of the ABET Student Outcome Scores to the Advancement of a Power Engineering Program: An Accomplished Experience


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine., Palestinian Territory, Occupied
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This article describes the application of a systematic approach to an electric power technology engineering (EPTE) program that ensured highquality (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - ABET) preparation. It describes how the Electrical Engineering Department at Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU), in Palestine, prepared for the EPTE program by defining and reviewing objectives and outcomes through a well-designed quality improvement process, and then implementing these evaluation results to develop the program. By obtaining results from courses delivered in two consecutive semesters, which could be more widened to a cycle of two consecutive academic years, it was possible to identify all student outcomes (SOs) with performances that either improved or deteriorated against a set threshold level of 80%. The final scores showed a mixed performance. While some SOs fell shortly below the set 80% threshold to an average level of 70%, others either met or exceeded threshold expectations. A deterioration in student outcome SO1 score related to ability of students to formulate and solve complex engineering problems. The SO2 score would require the laboratory and theoretical instructors to provide more discussion lectures and homework, in regard to circuit, system or process design, implementation and verification. The SO5 score showed that students needed to function more effectively as a team, while SO6 score indicated that students needed to improve their skills in experimentation, interpretation and analysis of data. The good scores; SO3, SO4 and SO7 related to ability of students to communicate effectively, recognize professional ethics and acquire and apply new knowledge.

Keywords

Academic Accreditation; Program Educational Objectives; Student Outcomes; Quality Assurance; Electrical Engineering.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Al-Yahya, S. A., and Abdel-Halim, M. A. (2012). A success-full experience of ABET accreditation of an electrical engineering program. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(2), 165-173.
  • ABET 2012,Mar6).About ABET. http://www.abet.org/about-abet/
  • Prados, J. W., Peterson, G. D., & Lattuca, L. R. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through accreditation: The impact of Engineering Criteria 2000 and its global influence. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 165-184.
  • Shuman, L. J., Besterfield‐Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET “Professional Skills”—Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?. Journal of engineering education, 94(1), 41-55.
  • Ata, O.W. (2019, Jul,1). Self-Study Report (Internal Report no. V1.4). Elect. Eng. Dept., College of Eng., PPU, Hebron, Palestine.
  • Quimpo, R. G. (2000). ABET preparations and experiences related to water resources. In Building Partnerships (pp. 1-10).
  • Sebern, M. J., Ardis, M., Hasker, R., McDonald, J., Reese, D., Vallino, J., & Zweben, S. (2003, November). Initial experiences in ABET accreditation of software engineering programs. In Frontiers in Education Conference (Vol. 3, pp. S1G-1). STIPES.
  • Damaj, I., Zaher, A., & Yousafzai, J. (2017). Assessment and evaluation framework with successful application in ABET accreditation.
  • Grebski, M. E., Wolniak, R., & Grebski, W. (2018). Continuous Quality Improvement of an Engineering Program as a Requirement for Abet Accreditation. Multidisciplinary Aspects of Production Engineering, 1(1), 393-398.
  • Shafi, A., Saeed, S., Bamarouf, Y. A., Iqbal, S. Z., Min-Allah, N., & Alqahtani, M. A. (2019). Student outcomes assessment methodology for ABET accreditation: A case study of computer science and computer information systems programs. IEEE Access, 7, 13653-13667.
  • Ayadat, T., & Asiz, A. (2020). Analysis of Engineering Accreditation Process and Outcomes: Lessons Learned for Successful First Time Application. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(9), 281-300.
  • Rashid, M. (2021). A systematic approach of data preparation for ABET accreditation. Int. J. Eng. Educ, 37(1), 1-13.

Abstract Views: 83

PDF Views: 0




  • Application of the ABET Student Outcome Scores to the Advancement of a Power Engineering Program: An Accomplished Experience

Abstract Views: 83  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Osama W. Ata
Dept. of Electrical Engineering Faculty of Engineering Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron, Palestine., Palestinian Territory, Occupied

Abstract


This article describes the application of a systematic approach to an electric power technology engineering (EPTE) program that ensured highquality (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - ABET) preparation. It describes how the Electrical Engineering Department at Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU), in Palestine, prepared for the EPTE program by defining and reviewing objectives and outcomes through a well-designed quality improvement process, and then implementing these evaluation results to develop the program. By obtaining results from courses delivered in two consecutive semesters, which could be more widened to a cycle of two consecutive academic years, it was possible to identify all student outcomes (SOs) with performances that either improved or deteriorated against a set threshold level of 80%. The final scores showed a mixed performance. While some SOs fell shortly below the set 80% threshold to an average level of 70%, others either met or exceeded threshold expectations. A deterioration in student outcome SO1 score related to ability of students to formulate and solve complex engineering problems. The SO2 score would require the laboratory and theoretical instructors to provide more discussion lectures and homework, in regard to circuit, system or process design, implementation and verification. The SO5 score showed that students needed to function more effectively as a team, while SO6 score indicated that students needed to improve their skills in experimentation, interpretation and analysis of data. The good scores; SO3, SO4 and SO7 related to ability of students to communicate effectively, recognize professional ethics and acquire and apply new knowledge.

Keywords


Academic Accreditation; Program Educational Objectives; Student Outcomes; Quality Assurance; Electrical Engineering.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet%2F2023%2Fv36i3%2F23097