Refine your search
Collections
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kauthekar, P. U.
- Marketing Cost, Marketing Margin and Price Spread of Soybean in Parbhani District of Maharashtra
Abstract Views :352 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 7, No 2 (2014), Pagination: 334-337Abstract
The investigation was made to know the marketing cost, marketing margin and price spread in soybean. The study was conducted in the Parbhani market for surveying of 30 market intermediaries. Three marketing channel were noticed in sale of soybean viz., Producer-Village merchant-Wholesaler-Oil processor (channel-I), Producer-Wholesaler- Oil processor (channel-II), Producer-Oil processor (channel-III), It was observed that per quintalmarketing cost was higher in channel-I i.e. Rs. 169.69 followed by Rs. 138.65 in channel-II and Rs.38.80 in channel-III, respectively. Producer's share in consumer's rupee was maximum in channel-III (98.93%) while minimum in channel-I (83.14%).Keywords
Soybean, Marketing Cost, Marketing Margin, Price Spread.
References
- Farkade, V.R., Choudhari, S.A., Amale, A.J. and Tilekar, S.N. (2011). Economic analysis of production and marketing of soyabean in Vidharbha region of Maharashtra. Indian J. Agril. Mktg., 25(2) : 122-134.
- Kumar, Vinod (2010). A study on marketing cost, price spread, price behaviour and marketing efficiency of groundnut in Rajasthan. Indian J. agric. Mktg., 24(2):152-163.
- Panghal, B.S. and Luhach, M.S. (2005). Marketing cost and margins of sunflower in Haryana. Encyclopedia Agric. Mktg., 10: 203-208.
- Shelke, R.D., Nagure, D.V. and Patil, S.N. (2009). Price spread and marketing pattern of groundnut in Maharashtra. Agric. Update, 4(3-4) : 376-378.
- Singh, A. Sharma, R.P. and Singh, Vinita (2011). Economics of production and marketing of soybean in block sonkutch of district was of Madhya Pradesh. Agric. Mktg. J.,23-26.
- Srivastava S.C., Gupta, B.S. and Singh, H.P. (2008). A study on economic analysis of marketing of soybean in Mandsaur district of Madhya Pradesh, Indian J. Agric. Mktg., 24(1):111-118.
- Thakare, S.S., Naphade, S.A. and Vitonde, A.K. (2011). Economics of production and marketing of cowpea. Indian J. Agril. Mktg., 25(2): 66.
- Resource Productivity and Resource Use Efficiency in Chickpea Production on Dryland Farm
Abstract Views :226 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 9, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 32-35Abstract
Resource productivity and resource use efficiency of chickpea production have been computed using primary data collected from 48 dryland farm spread over two tehsils in Nanded district of Maharashtra. The study revealed that area under chickpea, human labour, bullock labour, machine labour, seed, nitrogen, phosphorus and potash and plant protection as resources. Cobb Douglas production function was fitted to the data. The results revealed that partial regression co-efficient of human labour was 0.455 followed by that area under chickpea was (0.173) positive at 1 per cent level and partial regression co-efficient of nitrogen and machine labour were positive but non-significant. Marginal product of area under chickpea was 2.286 quintals followed by that of bullock labour (0.187 q), plant protection (0.187q) and human labour (0.114q). MVP to price ratio with respect to potash was 9.69 followed by seed (6.87), human labour (2.60) and area under chickpea (1.91). Optimum use of area under chickpea was found to be 0.78 hectare and optimum use of human labour was 56.25 mandays.Keywords
Chickpea, Resource Productivity, Resource Use Efficiency, Optimum Resource.References
- Asmatoddin, M J.N., Ghulghule, S.V., Jawale and Tawale, J.B. (2009). Resource productivity and resource use efficiency in pulses production on medium farm in Marathwada. Internat. J. Agric. Sci., 5(2): 359-362.
- Asmatoddin, M.S.V. Jawale and Perke, D.S. (2009). Economic anaylsis of pulses production on medium farm in Marathwada.Agric. Update,4 (3&4) : 262-265.
- Bahadur, T., Parhasarthy, P.B. and Reddy, K.S. (1988). Resources use efficiency in dry farming. Agric. Situ. India, 63 (1): 29-31.
- Bhendi, M.J. and Kalirajan, K. P. (2007). Technical efficiency of major food and cash crops in Karnataka (India). Indian J. Agric. Econ., 62(2) : 176-192.
- Chamak, J.S., Singh, A.J. and Sidhu, D.S. (1978). Resource use efficiency in Punjab. Agric. Situ. India, 34 (4): 211216.
- Kennedy, G.P., Raghuram, S.P.,Naidu, M.R. and Shreenivasula, R. (1990). Economics analysis of major pulses in Gujrat districts of Andhra Pradesh. Agric. Situ. India, 65 (2) : 173-182.
- Negi, R.S., Singh, L.R. and Moorti, T.V. (1972). Resources allocation efficiency on small farms in Nainetal Tarai. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 27(4): 167.
- Costs, Returns and Profitability of Dryland Farming System as a whole in Nanded of Maharashtra
Abstract Views :274 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, PARBHANI (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 9, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 40-43Abstract
Investigation regarding dryland farming system was carried out during the year 2013-2014. About 48 dryland farms were randomly selected from sixteen villages of two tehsils of Nanded district of Maharashtra. Data were collected by personal interview method by using pretested schedule. Data were related to all crops and livestocks on dryland farming system. The result revealed that area under all crops was 4.41 hectares in which shares of cotton crop was 24.94 per cent. Net profit from all crops was Rs. 66610.02 in which the share of cotton was 37.10 per cent. Net profit all livestocks was Rs. 42308.51 in which shares of crossbred cow was found to be 47.56 per cent. Thus, in relation to dryland farm business as a whole, net profit was found to be Rs. 108918.53. Regarding per hectare efficiency, soybean crop showed the highest output input ratio as compared to other crops in dryland farming system.Keywords
Dryland, per Field, per Hectare, Cost-C, Gross Return, Net Profit.References
- Bhagwat, M.Z. (2008). Economic analysis of small farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, 108 p.
- Gadre, N.A. (1995). Cost and returns of dairy enterprise as an adjunct to crop husbandry in Vidharbha region of Maharashtra state. Indian J. Agric.Econ., 50 (3) : 368-369.
- Kanhore, S.S.(2008). Economic analysis of large farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra, M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, 115 p.
- Mishra, J. P. and Shukla, B.D. (1969). A study on economics of high yielding varieties programme.Agric. Situ. India, 24 (2) : 107-111.
- Mishra, J.P. and Shukla, B.D. (1970). Economics of farming in Bichpuri block (Agra). Agril. Situ. India, 25 (1): 13-17.
- Murugan, D. and Namasivayam, D. (2005). The cost and return per acre among the different size of land holding in irrigated, unirrigated and the pooled farms in Tamil Nadu: A micro analysis. Agric. Situ. India, 62 (2): 115-124.
- Pandey, H.K. and Duggal, S.C. (1970). Input costs and returns of major crops in Niamatabad block of Varanasi. Agric. Situ. India, 24 (12): 1099-1103.
- Rathore, B.S. (1974). Business efficiency of different sizes of farms in Udaipur district. Agril. Situ. India, 29(7): 477- 481.
- Net Worth Statement, Income Statement and Performance of Residential Farm Business in Maharashtra
Abstract Views :229 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 10, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 20-24Abstract
The study was carried out during the year 2013-14 in Parbhani district of Maharashtra. About 48 residential farms were randomly selected from sixteen villages of two tehsils of Parbhani district of Maharashtra. Data were collected by personal interview method by using pretested schedule. The results revealed that, current asset was Rs. 541522.89 while intermediate asset was Rs. 109321.64 and long term asset was Rs.2071565.70. Hence, total asset was Rs. 2722410.23. The amount of total liability was Rs.241922.58 in which long term libility was Rs. 125533.53 followed by intermediate liability Rs. 29769.05 and current liability was Rs. 86620. Hence, net worth or equity was Rs.2480487.65. In income statement, gross cash income was Rs. 474092.89 and amount of total receipt was Rs. 630592.89. Total expense was Rs. 285890.17. Amount of net farm income was Rs. 344702.72.In regards to performance of residential farm business, current ratio was found to be 6.25. The intermediate ratio was found to be 5.59. The net capital ratio was 11.25.Current liability ratio was 0.03 which indicated negligible amount of current liability as compared to owner's equity. Debt-equity ratio was 0.09 and Equity value ratio was 0.91 on residential farm business. Operating ratio was found to be 0.42. Fixed ratio was 0.17.and gross net profit ratio was found to be 0.60.Keywords
Net Worth Statement, Income Statement, Residential Farm.References
- Bankar, S.S. (2010). Economic evaluation of women’sself help group in Ahmadnagar district of Maharashtra.M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA), 86p.
- Bhagwat, M.Z. (2008). Economic analysis of small farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA), 102 p.
- Khanhore, S.S. (2008). Economic analysis of large farm in Marathwada region of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA), 114 p.
- Pawar, B.R. (1996). Economics of dairying in assured rainfall zone of Maharashtra. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, KARNATAKA (INDIA) 398 p.
- Pawar, D.B. and Pawar, B.R. (2010). Net worth statement and income statement in farm business, pp. 84-90. In: A Text Book of production economics and farm management, Shri. Rajlaxmi Prakashan, Aurangabad, 107 p.
- Reddy, S.S. and Ram, P.R. (1996).Tools of financial analysis, pp 110-129. In: Agric. Finance Mgmt., Oxford and IBHPublishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India. 256 P.
- Effect of Socio-Economic Determinants on Gross Income of Non-Residential Farm in Parbhani District of Maharashtra
Abstract Views :181 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani (M.S.), IN
Source
International Journal of Commerce & Business Management, Vol 10, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 29-33Abstract
Investigation was carried out during the year 2014-15. In all 48 non-residential farms were randomly selected from sixteen villages of two tehsils in Parbhani district of Maharashtra. Data were related to cropping pattern and livestock pattern as well as socio-economic determinants. The results revealed that operational land holding showed highly significant on nonresidential farm with regression co-efficient of 5880.0 It means that addition of one hectare could cause to increase gross income of Rs. 5880.0. Regression co-efficient of livestock was 2010.0. It means that addition of one livestock could cause to increase gross income of Rs. 5841.99. On the contrary, distance of farm from village showed negative regression co-efficient of -3535, it could adversely affect gross income of Rs. 3535. Thus, the farmers have to give more importance to land holding, livestock and distance of farm from village in order to increase gross income on non-residential farm. Co-efficient of multiple determination (R2) was 0.622, it means that there was 62.20 per cent effect of all independent variables together to gross income on non-residential farm.Keywords
Non-Residential Farm, Regression Co-Efficient, Gross Income, Linear Function.References
- Malik, D.P., Singh, S.N., Karwasra, J.C. and Rai, K.N. (2000). Sources of information on imrpoved production technology and its valuation in Haryana. J. Agric. Econ., 55 (3) : 521-527.
- Pawar, P.P., Jadhav, K.L., Pokharkar, Y.G. and Kakad, B.S. (2002). Farm investment and income pattern of farm size groups in Maharashtra. Economic Affairs, 47 (2) : 88-93.
- Shrivastav, A., Gupta, S.K., Athavale, M.C. and Mishra, A.M. (1996). Income saving and investment behaviour of farmers : A case study of Balaghat district, Madhya Pradesh. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 51(4):611-612.
- Stanton, B.F. (1991). Farm structure concept and definition. Paper submited to Carnell University, Ithaca, NEW YORK, U.S.A.
- Toor, M.S., Bhullar, A.S. and Sindhu, J.S. (2006). Income and employment pattern in Punjab. Agric. Situ. India, 63 (3) : 149-154.
- Yadav, S.U. (2001). Economics of production of minor oilseeds in Latur district of Maharashtra. M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Krishi Vidyapeeth, Parbhani, M.S. (INDIA) 62p.