Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kumar, Rupendra
- Performance in on Farm Trials of Mustard Varietis in Bhind District of Madhya Pradesh
Abstract Views :455 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Rupendra Kumar
1,
Raj Singh Kushwah
1,
U. C. Sharma
1,
Raj Pal Singh Tomar
1,
Arvinder Kaur
1,
V. S. Bhadauriya
1,
S. K. Singh
1
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 16, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 138-142Abstract
The study was conducted in Bhind district of M.P. during 2014-15 to 2016-17. Total eighty on farm trails at farmers field in different villages i.e. Jaganpura, Bespura, Bhikampura, Chiruli, Ruhani Jagir and Devarikala during the years from active participation of district farmers with the to improve the productivity of mustard crop in the district. The improved technologies consist improved varieties i.e. NRCDR-02 and Pusha mustard 28 were trials at farmers field during the years. It has been seen that the improved variety of mustard i.e. NRCDR 02 recorded average higher yield (16.96 q/ha ), while it has been observed 16.01 q / ha. In case of pusa mustard 28. Farmers practice average yield during the years was observed 14.88 q/ ha. The average percentage in yield increased over farmers practice during the years was 11.03, while it was observed in case of NRCDR-02 and Pusa mustard 28 i.e. 12.57 and 9.48 per cent, respectively over farmers practice during the years. Pusa mustard 28 has taken less maturity days (about 14 to 20 days) as compared to NRCDR 02 and pusa mustard 28. The tabulation, mean, B.C. ratio and percentage have been used to draw the results from the data.Keywords
On Farm Trials, Extension Gap, Technology Gap, Technology Index, Production Technology of Mustard.
References
- Ahmed, A. Guruprem and Kumar, R. (2013). Impact of frontline demonstrations on Indian mustard through improved technologies. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 13 (1) : 117-119.
- Anonymous (2015). Annual progress report - DDA, Bhind (2014-15).
- Bar, N. and Das, S. (2015). Enhancement of production and productivity of arhar crop through frony line demonstration. Internat. J. Innovat. Res. &Develop., 4 (5) : 1-3.
- Dayanand, Verma R.K. and Mehta, S.M. (2012). Boosting mustard production through front line demonstration. Indian Res. J. Extn. Edu., 12 (3): 121-123.
- D.R.M.R., Vision 2050 (2015). Directorate of rapeseed mustard research, Bharatpur, Rajasthan: http://www.ICAR.org.in/ Vision%202050%2020DRMR% 20 Rajasthan.
- Dutta, R. (2014). Yield gap analysis of rapseed-mustard in North Bank plain Zone of Assam. Indian Res.J.Ext.Edu., 14 (3): 122-124.
- Indian Statistical (India statcom). (2014-15).
- Kumar, R.(2013). Evaluation of crop technology demonstration of mustard crop in transitional plain of Inland Drainage Zone of Rajasthan. Internat. J. Agric. & Statist Sci., 9 (2):657-660.
- Kumar, R. (2014). Crop technology demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of wheat production technologies. Agric. Sci. Digest- A Res. J., 34 (2) : 131-134.
- Kushwah, R.S.,Kumar, Rupendra, Sharma, U.C.,Bhadauria, N.S., Kushwaha, N.K. and Kumar, Chanda (2018). Impact of front line demonstration technologies on sesame crop yield in Bhind district (M.P.). Indian Res. J.Ext. Edu.,18 (2): 97-100.
- Pandey, S., Manoj, K.M. and Tripathi, M.K. (2013). Study of inheritance of arucic acid in Indian mustard (Brassica Juncea L.). Octa J. Bio Sci., 1 : 77-84.
- Patel, R.N.,Prajapati, M.M., Dhandhukia, R.D. and Chaudhary, F.K. (2014). Study of front line demonstration (FLD) on mustard. Adv. Res. Agri. Vet. Sci., 1 (2) : 62-64.
- Patil, Lalit M., Modi, D.J., Vasava, H.M. and Gomkale, S.R. (2015). Evaluation of front line demonstration programme on green gram variety Meha (IPM-99-125) in Bharuch district of Gujarat (India).
- Shekhawat, K., Rathore, S.S., Premi, O.P., Kandpal and Chauhan, J.S. (2012). Advances in agronomics management of Indian mustard [Brasica juncea (L) Czern. Cosson]: An overview. Internat. J. Agric., 1-14.doi:10.1155/2012/408284.
- Singh, C., Singh, P. and Singh, R.(2009). Modern techniques of raising field crops. 2 Ed. Oxford and IHB Publishing Company Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
- Singh, M., Poonia, M.K., Sharma, K.M., Goyal, M.C. and Kumhar, B.L. (2017).Yield gap analysis of mustard crop: A case study of village Chomakot in Kota district. Chem. Sci. Rev. Lett., 6 (22) : 671-675.
- Singh, R.K., Singh, R.R., Singh, V.B. and Singh, A.K. (2014). Impact of technology adoption on productivity of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) under front line demonstration. Internat. J. Farm Sci., 4 (2) : 202-207.
- Impact of Frontline Demonstration on Green Gram Yield Through Improved Technologies in Gwalior District of Madhya Pradesh
Abstract Views :387 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 16, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 166-169Abstract
The present study was conducted in Gwalior district of Madhya Pradesh during 2007-08 to 2011-12 in 25.20 ha of land with 63 frontline demonstrations have been conducted in Nikodi, Udaipur, Sirol, Bhadrauli, Hiri villages of Gwalior in sandy loam to clay loam soils with the active participation of farmers with the objective to demonstrate the improved technologies of green gram. The improved technologies of green gram consisted of use of improved varieties, seed treatment with Rhizobium culture and PSB (Phosphate soluble bacteria), balance dose of fertilizers,YVM resistance varieties, integrated pest and diseases management and integrated weed management. The average yield of green gram in frontline demonstration recorded higher (9.65q/ ha) as compared to farmers practice (6.75 q/ha). The average increased in the demonstration yield over farmer’s practice was 42.96 per cent. The technology gap, extension gap and technology index were recorded 2.59 q/ha, 2.23 q/ha and 25.94 per cent, respectively. Improved technologies gave higher net return (Rs. 17685 per ha) with a benefit cost ratio 2.73 as compared to farmers practice (Rs.11463 / ha) benefit cost ratio 2.14.Keywords
Frontline Demonstration, Green Gram, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index, BC Ratio.References
- Anonymous (2011). Agricultural studies division, directorate of economics and statics, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, U.P. India.
- Bar, N. and Das, S. (2015). Enhancement of production and productivity of Arhar crop through front line demonstration. Internat. J. Innovative Res. & Develop., 4 (5) :1-3.
- Choudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra- a guide for KVK managers, Publication, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 73-78pp.
- Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010).Evaluation of onfarm frontline demonstration on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23 (2) : 341-342.
- Jeenger, K.L., Panwar, P. and Paree, K.O.P. (2006). Frontline demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajasthan. Current Agriculture, 30 (1/2) : 115-116.
- Kannaiyan, S. (1999). Bioresource technology for sustainable agriculture. Associated Publicity Company, New Delhi, India, pp. 422.
- Kiresur, V.R., Ramanna Rao, S.V. and Hedge, D.M. (2001). Improved technologies in oilseeds production an assessement of their economic potentials in India. Agriculturar Economics Research Review, 14 : 95-108.
- Lalit, M., Patil, D.J., Modi, H.M. Vasava and Gomkale, S.R. (2015). Evaluation of frontline demonstration programme on green gram varity Meha (IPM 99-125) in Bharuch district of Gujarat. 10 SR J. Agric. & Vet. Sci., 8 (9) : 01-03.
- Mokidue, I., Mohanti, A.K. and Sanjay, K. (2011).Correlation growth , yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu., 11 (2) : 20-24.
- Patel, M.M., Jhajharia, A.K., Khadda, B.S. and Patil, L.M. (2013). Frontline demonstration: An effective communication approach for dissemination of sustainable cotton production technology. Indian J. Extn. Edu. & R D, 21: 60-62.
- Poornia, T.C. and Pithia, M.S. (2011). Impact of frontline demonstration of chickpea in Gujarat. Legume Res., 34 (4) : 304-307.
- Raj, A.D., Yadav, V. and Rathod, J.H. (2013). Impact of Front Line Demonstrations (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scientific & Res. Publications, 3(9): 1-4.
- Roy Burman, R., Singh, S.K., Singh, Lakhan and Singh, A.K. (2006). Adoption of improved pulses production technologies and related constraints in Utter Prades. Indian J. Pulses Res., 19 (1) : 104-106.
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S., Roy, D.K., Mandal, A.K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on frontline demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180 - 183.
- Jyothiswaroopa, V . Dmounica and Pavani, U. (2016). Impact of frontline demonstration (FLDs) on the yield of green gram, (Vigna radiate L ) in tribal belt of east Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. Internat. J. Farm Sci., 6(1):169-173.
- Effect of Different Dates of Sowing and Fertility Level on Growth, Yield and Economics of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Gird Zone of Madhya Pradesh
Abstract Views :377 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 16, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 208-211Abstract
An experiment was conducted during Rabi seasons of 2013-14 and 2015 at RVSKVV, Special Agriculture Research Station, Farm, Bhind (M.P.) with 3 sowing dates and 3 fertility levels treatments. The experiment laid out in Split Plot Design with 3 replications on the basis of two year pooled data result revealed that sowing on 25thNovember with 120:60:40kg/ha NPK, application gave significantly higher grain yield (4.22 t/ ha) and net return (Rs. 53850/ha). Result also prove that the optimum date sowing (25 November) revealed maximum yield attributes, plant height (84.50cm), ear length (8.91cm), grains/ear (47.32) and test weight (39.79g) which were significantly higher than all other showing dates.Keywords
Crop production, Fertility levels, Sowing dates, Wheat.References
- Agrawal, S.K. and Singh, R. (2004). Effect of organic manuring and nitrogen fertilization on productivity nitrogen use efficiency and economics of wheat crop. Indian J. Agron., 19: 49-52.
- Amin, G.A.M., Geweifel, H.G., Gomma, M.A., Elkholy, M. A. and Mohmmed, M.H. (2011). Effect of sowing methods and fertilization on yield analysis and grain quality of wheat under new reclaimed sandy soil. J. Appl. Sci. Res., 7 (12) :1760-1767.
- Baloch, M.S, Shah, I.T.H., Nadim, M.A., Khan, M.I. and Khakwani, A.R. (2010). Effect of seeding, density and planting time on growth and yield attributes of wheat. J. Anim. &Plant Sci., 20 (4) : 239-240.
- DAC (2017). Directorate of economics and Statistics Department of Agriculture and cooperation Government of India, New Delhi, India.
- EL-Gizowy, N.K.B. (2009).Effect of planting date and fertilizer application on yield of wheat under no till system. World J. Agric. Sci., 5 (6) : 777-783.
- Jat, L.K., Singh, S., Latare, A.M., Singh, R.S. and Patel, C.B. (2013). Effect of date of sowing and fertilization on growth and yield of wheat in an inceptisol of Varanasi. Indian J. Agron., 58 (4) : 611-616.
- Rao, G.G., Kesava, S.N., Rao, A.V.R., Ramkrishna, Y.S. and Victor, W.S. (1999). Resource characterization of dry land; climate (in) 50 Years of DrylandAgriculture Research in India CRIDA, Hyderabad (India).
- Shivpurkar, G.N., Wagh, M.P. and Patil, D.T. (2008). Comparative performance of wheat genotype under different sowing date. Agricultural Science Digest., 28 (3): 231-232.
- Tariq, J.M.T., Arif, M., Akhar, H. and Ali, S. (2007).Response of wheat to source type and time of nitrogen application. Sarhad J. Agric., 23 (4) : 871-879.
- Yadav, M.P. Aslam, M. and Kushwah, S.P. (2005). Effect of INM on rice-wheat cropping system in Central Plane Zone of U.P. Indian J. Agron., 50 (2): 89-93.
- Evaluation of Chickpea Varieties under Frontline Demonstration at Farmer’s Field in Bhind District of M.P.
Abstract Views :357 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Rupendra Kumar
1,
Raj Singh Kushwah
1,
S. K. Singh
2,
U. C. Sharma
3,
N. S. Bhadauria
1,
R. P. S. Tomar
1
Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
2 Sirsode Farm (M.P.), IN
3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Lahar, Bhind (M.P.), IN
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Gwalior (M.P.), IN
2 Sirsode Farm (M.P.), IN
3 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (RVSKVV), Lahar, Bhind (M.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 16, No 2 (2020), Pagination: 244-248Abstract
The study was carried out to know the gap between improved packages of practices in gram crop. Frontline demonstration on gram varieties J.G.16, JAKI 92-18 and J.G. 130 were conducted at farmer’s field in the adopted village of Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Lahar Bhind (M.P.) during the years 2010-11 to 2014-15. The average yield of J.G. 16 variety was 18.07 q/ha. J.G. 16 has given 20.4 q/ha. Highest yield during the year under frontline demonstration while local varieties gave 16.61 q/ha average yield during the year. The variety JAKI -9218 was demonstrated during 2011-12 and 2012-13 gave average yield at the farmers field 17.32 q/ha and 15.99 q/ ha, respectively. While variety conducted farmers practice gave average yield 13.62 q/ha and 13.52 during the years, respectively. The variety was given 18.50 q/ha. Highest yield under FLD, while farmers practice given highest yield 13.90 q/ha. The variety conducted under front line demonstrated was gave 27.16 per cent and 18.26 per cent higher yield over farmers practices during 2011-2012 and 2012-13, respectively. The average B.C. ratio of demonstrated technology was 1:180. J.G. 130 variety of gram tested at farmers field during 2012-13 and gave average yield 17.56 q/ha. While it was 13.1q/ha. in farmers practice. 34.04 per cent increased yield was recorded over farmer’s practices. The variety JG 130 also demonstrated in farmers field under frontline demonstration during 2013-14 and 2014 -15 in 10.40 ha land on 26 farmers field, this variety during the years could not sown its performance due to rainfall and hailstorm during flowering to maturity. The average yield during the years (2013-14 and 2014 -15) was 6.13 and 2.53 q / while it had been seen in case of farmers practice 3.93 q/ha and 2.50 q/ha, respectively. Sixty four demonstration have been conducted during 2010-11 to 2014-15 in 25.80 ha of land. It could be said the yield performance of variety under improved package of practices not only in favour of increased yield but also economic condition of the farmers of the district.Keywords
Frontline Demonstration, Gram, Varietal Performance, Economic Analysis, Farmers Practices, Technology Gap, Extension Gap, Technology Index.References
- Choudhary, B.N. (1999). Krishi Vigyan Kendra- a guide for KVK managers, Publication, Division of Agricultural Extension, ICAR. 73-78pp.
- FAOSTAT (2012). FROSTAT- Statisical Database, 2012.
- Hiremath, S.M. and Nagaraju, M.V. (2010).Evaluation of onfarm front line demonstration on the yield of chilli. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 23(2):341-342.
- Jeenger, K.L., Panwar, P. and Pareek, O.P. (2006). Frontline demonstration on maize in Bhilwara district of Rajasthan, Current Agriculture, 30 (1/2):115-116.
- Jyothiswaroopa, V., Dmounica and Upavani (2016). Impact of frontline demonstration (FLDs) on the yield of green gram, Vigna radiate L in tribal belt of east Godavari district of Andhra Pradesh. Internat. J. Farm Sci., 6(1): 169-173.
- Kiresur, V.R., Rao, Ramanna S.V. and Hedge, D.M. (2001). Improved technologies in oilseeds production an assessment of their economics potentials in India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 14 : 95-108.
- Kumar, A., Kumar, R. and Yadav, U.P.S. (2010). Impact assessment of front line demonstrtion of Bajra in Haryana state. Indian Res.J.Extn. Educ., 12 (3): 121-123.
- Mishra, P.K. and Khare, Y.R. (2017). Impact of frontline demonstratin on yield and profitability of chichpea (Cicer arietinum) in Sagar district of Bundelkhand region of Madhya radish. Plant Archieve, 17 (1) : 463-466.
- Mukhergee, N. (2003). Participatory learning and action. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, 63-65pp.
- Poornia, T.C. and Pithia, M.S. (2011). Impact of frontline demonstration of chickpea in Gujarat. Legume Research, 34 (4) : 304-307.
- Reddy, A.A. (2010). Regional disparities in food habits and nutritional intake in Andhra Pradesh, India. Regional & Sectoral Economics Studies, 10 (2): 125-134 .
- Samui, S.K., Maitra, S. Roy, D.K., Mandal, A. K. and Saha, D. (2000). Evaluation on frontline demonstration on groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). J. Indian Soc. Coastal Agric. Res., 18: 180 - 183.
- Singh, H.P., Gupta B.S., Chauhan, Rajeev, Chundawat, G.S. and Kumar, Rupendra (2013).Varietal performance of soybean at farmer’s field under front line demonstration oil seed Kharif in district Mandsaur Madhya Pradesh. J. Community Mobilization & Sustainable Development, 8 (2): 266-269
- Singh, P.K. (2002). Impact of participation in planning on adoption of new technology through FLD. Mgmt Extn. Res. Rev., 45-48.