Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
John Sudheer, M.
- On Farm Demonstrations on Response of Chickpea to Irrigation in Farmers Fields of Anantapuram District of Andhra Pradesh
Abstract Views :192 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
3 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
1 Agricultural Research Station, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
3 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 11, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 337-340Abstract
Six on-farm demonstrations were conducted to popularize the effect of irrigation on growth, yield components, yield and economics of chickpea in two villages viz., Akuledu and R. Kothuru of Anantapuram district with an area of 7.2 hectares during Rabi season over a period of 3 years from 2007-08 to 2009-10. The results revealed that growth parameters like plant height, number of pods per plant, hundred pod weight, hundred seed weight of chickpea were improved by providing irrigation at 35 and 55 DAS compared to farmers practice. By giving irrigation at 35 and 55 DAS plant height, number of pods per plant, 100 pod weight and 100 seed weight were increased by 9.1, 38.7, 16.9, and 23.4 per cent, respectively over farmers practice. Irrigation at 35 and 55 DAS recorded higher seed yield (2006 kg ha-1) which was 35.1 per cent higher over farmers practice (1485 kg ha-1). Gross returns (Rs. 44655/-) and net returns (Rs. 34080/-) per hectare were more with irrigation at 35 and 55 DAS compared to farmers practice (Rs. 32783/- gross returns and Rs. 19908/- net returns).Keywords
Chickpea, Irrigation, Farmers Fields, Anantapuram District.- Weed Management in Groundnut through Farmers Participatory Approach
Abstract Views :246 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
1 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, ANANTAPURAM (A.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 11, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 341-345Abstract
To popularize herbicides usage in groundnut cultivation 15 on-farm demonstrations were conducted in farmers fields with an area of 12.0 hectares under supervision of DAATT Centre (Extension unit of Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh), Anantapuram during Rabi season over a period of 3 years from 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14. The treatments consisted of T1: Herbicide application (Pendimethalin @ 3.75 lit/ha as pre-emergence + quizalopop ethyl @ 1.0 lit/ha as post-emergence at 20 days after sowing + one hand weeding at 40 days after sowing) T2: farmers practice (Manual weeding with Danthulu twice at 20 and 40 days after sowing) with an objective to obtain higher productivity, to reduce the cost of cultivation of groundnut and subsequently improve the returns from unit area in farmers' fields. Demonstrations revealed that application of pendimethalin @ 3.75 lit/ha immediately after sowing + quizalopop ethyl @ 1.0 lit/ha at 20 days after sowing + manual weeding at 40 days after sowing has recorded higher pod yield (2252 kg ha-1) which was 15.2 per cent higher over farmers practice (1955 kg ha-1). A saving of Rs. 4000/- (Rupees four thousand only) on cost of cultivation per hectare was realized with herbicide application besides increasing groundnut yield. Higher gross returns (Rs. 1,05,844/-) and net returns (Rs. 83,094/-) per hectare were with herbicide application compared to farmers practice (Rs. 91,885/- gross returns and Rs. 65,135/- net returns). Due to herbicide application cost of cultivation was reduced by 15.3 per cent whereas, gross returns and net returns were improved by 20.1 and 43.1 per cent, respectively over farmers practice.Keywords
Groundnut, Weed Management, Farmers Fields.- On Farm Demonstration of Zero Tillage Maize in Farmers Fields of Anantapuram District of Andhra Pradesh
Abstract Views :233 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, Anantapuram (A.P.), IN
2 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, Anantapuram (A.P.), IN
1 Agricultural Research Station, Anantapuram (A.P.), IN
2 District Agricultural Advisory and Transfer of Technology Centre, Anantapuram (A.P.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 12, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 134-138Abstract
On farm demonstrations were conducted in farmers fields to popularize zero tillage maize technology among farmers under supervision of DAATT Centre (Extension unit of Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Andhra Pradesh), Anantapuram for four years during Rabi, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 and 2014-15. The comparison was made between zero tillage maize and farmers practice (traditional maize cultivation) with an objective to obtain higher maize productivity and net returns in farmers fields under zero tilled conditions. Results revealed that higher cob length of 17.4 cm was recorded with zero tillage maize compared to farmers practice (15.5 cm). Higher grain weight per plant of 129 g was recorded with zero tillage maize compared to farmers practice (115 g). There were more number of grains per cob (421) in zero tillage maize as compared to 385 grains per cob in farmers practice. Higher 100 grain weight of 26.2 g was recorded with zero tillage maize compared to farmers practice (23.6 g). In zero tillage maize cob length, grain weight / plant, number of grains/cob and 100 grain weight were increased by 12.3, 12.2, 9.4 and 11.0 per cent, respectively over farmers practice. Zero tillage maize recorded higher grain yield (6250 kg ha-1) and stover yield (7750 kg ha-1) which was 11.4 and 6.9 per cent, respectively higher over farmers practice (5610 kg ha-1grain yield and 7250 kg ha-1 stover yield). Gross returns (Rs. 93,750/-) and net returns (Rs. 78,000/-) per hectare were more with zero tillage maize compared to farmers practice (Rs. 84,150/- gross returns and Rs. 62,500/-net returns). Simultaneously cost benefit ratio was higher with zero tillage maize (1:5.9) compared to farmers practice (1:3.9) because of lower cost of cultivation and improved yield with zero tillage maize. In zero tillage maize cost of cultivation was reduced by 27.3 per cent whereas, gross returns and net returns were improved by 11.4 and 24.8 per cent, respectively over farmers practice.Keywords
On Farm Demonstration, Zero Tillage Maize, Farmers Fields.References
- Chandrapala, A.G., Yakadri, M., Mahender, Kumar, R. and Bhupal Raju, G. (2010). Productivity and economics of rice (Oryza sativa) – maize (Zea mays) as influenced by methods of crop establishment, Zn and S application in rice. Indian J. Agron., 55 (3):171-176.
- DMR (2009). Technical bulletin of directorate of maize. Research Centre, ICAR, New Delhi, 5:10-11.
- Gangwar, B., Gangwar, K.S. and Tomar, O.K. (2011). Need of cropping systems based approach of agro-technology: for higher productivity, profitability and soil health. Indian Fmg., 61 (2):3-6.
- Mukundam, B., Srividya, S. and Raja, V. (2011). Productivity and economics of rice-zero till maize as influenced by weed management practices in southern Telangana region of Andhra Pradesh. Indian J.Weed Sci.,43 (3&4):163-168.
- Naidu, K.R.K., Ramana, A.V., Veeraraghavaiah, R. and Ashoka, Rani Y. (2011). Effect of pre- and post- emergence herbicides on the control of Vicia sativain rice – fallow black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Andhra Agril. J., 58 (1):5-8.