Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Shreenivas, B. V.
- Effect of Nutrient Management Approaches on the Quality of Soil and Crops, Sustainability of Yield in Maize-Chickpea Sequential Cropping System
Abstract Views :359 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), IN
1 Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur (Karnataka), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol 13, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 353-359Abstract
Field experiments were conducted during 2010-11 and 2011-12 at Agricultural Research Station, Raddewadagi, Jewargi taluk, Kalaburagi district, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur to study the nutrient management approaches on the quality of soil and crops, sustainability of yield in maize-chickpea sequential cropping system involving SSNM and STCR targeted yield of 7 or 8 t ha-1 in clayey soils of Vertisol of UKP area. The application of nutrients through SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 produced significantly higher grain yield and sustainability yield index (8.62 and 0.80, respectively) as compared to absolute control, farmers practice, state recommendation and STL method and it was at par with STCR approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 (8.37 t ha-1 and 0.77, respectively), SSNM approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 (7.59, t ha-1 and 0.68, respectively), STCR approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 (7.46 t ha-1 and 0.67, respectively), 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 (6.45 t ha-1 and 0.55, respectively) and 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 (6.35, t ha-1 and 0.54, respectively). Organic carbon content was non-significant in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system. However, significantly higher available N, P2O5 and K2O (301.05, 62.93 and 439.38 kg ha-1, respectively) were noticed with nutrients applied through 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 as compared to absolute control, farmers practice, state recommendation, STL method and 125 per cent SSNM approach for targeted yield of 7.0 t ha-1 after harvest of second crop in maize-chickpea sequence cropping system and it was at par with SSNM or STCR approach for targeted yield of 7.0 or 8.0 t ha-1. Application of nutrients through SSNM approach for targeted yield of 8.0 t ha-1 recorded significantly higher protein (6.59%) and protein yield (568.01 kg ha-1) and also its residual effect was recorded significantly higher protein content (20.28%) and protein yield (606.31 kg ha-1) in chickpea as compared to other treatments.Keywords
Maize-Chickpea Sequential Cropping System, Grain Yield, Sustainability Yield Index, SSNM, STCR, Protein, Protein Yield.
References
- Al Zubaidi, A.H. and Al Semak, K. (1992). Interactive effect of soil salinity and potassium fertilizer on the growth and salt tolerance of corn. J. Agric. Res., 2(1): 10-27.
- Anonymous (2007). STCR an approach for fertilizer recommendations based on targeted yield concept. Tec. Bul., AICRP on STCR. University of Agricultural Sciences,, Bangalore (KARNATAKA) INDIA.
- Arya, K.C. and Singh, S.N. (2000). Effect of different levels of phosphorus and zinc on yield and nutrients uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) with and without irrigation. Indian J. Agron., 45 (4): 717-721.
- Biradar, Ashok and Jayadeva, H.M. (2013). Influence of targeted yield approach on yield, yield attributes, nutrient uptake and economics of maize. Madras Agric. J., 100 (1-3) : 146-149.
- Biradar, Ashok, Jayadeva, H.M., Shakaralingappa, B.C. and Vishwanath, A.P. (2013). Effect of targeted yield approach on growth, yield and nutrient uptake at flowering of maize.Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 47(4): 707-712.
- Biradar, D.P., Aladakatti, Y.R., Rao, T.N. and Tiwari, K.N. (2006). Site-specific nutrient management for maximization of crop yields in Northern Karnataka. Better Crops, 90(3): 33-35.
- Dhillon, N.S., Brar, B.S., Benipal, D.S. and Mavi, M.S. (2006). Economics of various soil test based fertilization approaches for different crops. Crop Res., 32(3): 377-381.
- Gawai, P.P. and Pawar, V.S. (2005). Production, potential and economics of sorghum-chickpea cropping sequence under irrigated nutrient management system. Crop Res., 30(3): 345-348.
- Jackson, M.L. (1973). Soil chemical analysis, Prentice Hall of India (Pvt) Ltd., NEW DELHI, INDIA.
- Kumar, A., Majumdar, K., Jat, M.L., Pampolino, N., Kamboj, B.R., Bishnoi, D.K., Kumar, V. and Johnston, A.M. (2012). Evaluation of nutrient expert for wheat. Better Crops South Asia., 6 (1) : 27-29.
- Mandal, M.K., Pati, R., Mukhopadhyay, D. and Majumdar, K. (2009). Maximizing yield of cowpea through soil test-based nutrient application in Terai Alluvial soils. Better Crops, 3(1): 28-30.
- Meena, Omraj, Khafi, H.R., Shekh, M.A., Asah, C. and Mehta, Dovda (2007). Effect of vermicompost and nitrogen on content, uptake and yield of Rabimaize. Crop Res., 33(1, 2 & 3): 53-54.
- Miao, Y., Mulla, D.J., Hernandez, J.A., Wiebers, M. and Robert, P.C. (2007). Potential impact of precision nitrogen management on corn yield, protein content and test weight. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 71 (5) : 1490-1499.
- Shankar, M.A., Maruthi Sankar, G.R., Thimmegouda, M.N. and Nagamani, M.K. (2014). Micro-nutrient for soil fertility, nutrients uptake and productivity of greengram (Vigna radiata) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) under semi-arid Alfisols. Indian J. Agron., 59(2): 306-316.
- Singh, A.K., Bhatti, B.P., Sundaram, P.K., Santosh Kumar, Bahrati, R.C., Naresh, C. and Rai, Mathura (2012).Study of site specific nutrients management of cowpea seed production and their effect on soil nutrient status. J. Indian. Agril. Sci., 4(10): 191-198.
- Singh, J., Bajaj, J.C. and Pathak, H. (2005). Quantitative estimation of fertilizer requirement for maize and chickpea in the alluvial soil of the Indo-Gangetic plains. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(1): 101-106.
- Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of the available nitrogen in soil. Curr. Sci., 25 (8): 259-260.
- Tomar, S., Suresh and Timari, A.S. (1990). Production potential and economics of different cropping sequences. Indian J. Agron., 35: 30-35.
- Umesh, M.R., Manjunatha, N., Shankar, M.A. and Jagadeesha, N. (2014). Influence of nutrient supply levels on yield, nutrient uptake, grain quality and economics of corn (Zea mays L.) in Alfisols of Karnataka. Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. & Dev., 29(1): 73-78.
- Varalakshmi, L.R., Srinivasamurthy, C.A. and Bhasakar, S. (2005). Effect of integrated use of organic manures and inorganic fertilizers on organic carbon, available N, P and K in sustaining productivity of groundnut-finger millet cropping system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 53(8): 315-318.
- Vidyavathi, Dasog, G.S., Babalad, H.B., Hebsur, N.S., Gali, S.K., Patil, S.G. and Alagawadi, A.R. (2011). Influence of nutrient management practices on crop response and economics in different cropping systems in a Vertisol. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 24(4): 455-460.