Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Kant, Rajni
- Mechanization Planning to Bridge the Mechanization Gap for Different Farm Operations to Meet Fodder and Crop Production in Region, Pusa, Bihar, India
Abstract Views :161 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), IN
2 College of Agricultural Engineering, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, Pusa (Bihar), IN
1 Department of Agricultural and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur (W.B.), IN
2 College of Agricultural Engineering, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University, Pusa (Bihar), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 10, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 488-495Abstract
The present study deals with purpose mechanization planning to bridge the mechanization gap for different farm operations for sustainable farming in Pusa region. The results obtained from survey conducted to list out the machineries available as well as gap to the farm, the mechanization planning was suggested on the available field conditions to bridge this gap. Grassland-based cattle farms are highly dynamic systems that are difficult to manage, mostly because of their sensitivity to uncontrollable environmental factors such as weather. The results obtained from the survey conducted in the cattle farm of Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University situated in Samastipur was noticed 70 hp (~0.87 hp/ha) utilization of farm power in terms of available machinery for farm operations which was calculated lower than reported a value of power utilization as 1.5 hp/ha for successful farm operation through mechanization. Mechanization of agriculture to meet the growing demand of population, productivity of land has to be enhanced. This can be done by timely application of improved technology. For good retaining the quality as well as nutritional aspects of green fodder, it is essential to harvest fodder with taking minimum operational time. Nutritious green fodder is required to enhance the quality of milk in terms of vitamin A, D, E, and K. To enhance the productivity, to reduce seed losses and to facilitate interculturing activities, it is necessary to perform sowing operation properly. Maximum production of fodder is required to meet the fodder requirement production as well as to enhance the quality of milk. Mechanization is also essential to understand the importance of maintaining the health and to aware the different initiatives being undertaken by cattle farm farmers to protect and enhance the environment.Keywords
Farm Mechanization, Farm Power, Cattle Farm, Status of Farm, Milk Quality, Mechanization Planning.
References
- Anonymous (2013-14). AICRP on farm implement and machinery (FIM). Dr Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Report.
- Benjamin, D. and Brandt, L. (2002). Property rights, labour markets, and efficiency in a transition economy: The case of rural China. Canadian J. Econ., 35 : 689–716.
- Berry, R. and Cline, W. (1979). Agrarian structure and productivity in developing countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Chen, Z., Huffman, W. E., and Rozelle, S. (2009). Farm technology and technical efficiency: Evidence from four regions in China. China Econ. Rev., 20(2) : 153–161.
- Choudhury, B.U., Mohapatra, K.P., Das Anup Pratibha, T., Das Nongkhlaw, L., Abdul Fiyaz, R., Ngachan, S.V., Hazarika, S., Rajkhowa, D.J. and Munda, G.C. (2013). Spatial variability in distribution of organic carbon stocks in the soils of North East India. Curr. Sci., 104 (5) : 604–614.
- Dimitri, C., Effland, A. and Conklin, N. (2005). The 20th century transformation of U.S. agriculture and farm policy. USDA Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.
- Edens, W.C., Pordesimo, L.O., Wilhelm, L.R. and Burns, R.T. (2003). Energy use analysis of major milking center components at a dairy experiment station. Appl. Engg. Agric., 19 (6) : 711–716.
- Feder, G. (1985). The relation between farm size and farm productivity. J. Dev. Econ., 18 : 297–313.
- Ghosh, P.K., Saha, R., Gupta, J.J., Ramesh, T., Das, A., Lama, T.D., Munda, G.C., Bordoloi, J.S., Verma, M.R. and Ngachan, S.V. (2009). Long-term effect of pastures on soil quality in acid soil of North–East India. Aust. J. Soil Res., 47 : 372–379.
- Grisso, R.D., Kocher, M.F. and Vaughan, D.H. (2004). Predicting tractor fuel consumption. Appl. Eng. Agric., 20 (5) : 553–561.
- Institut de l’Elevage (2009). Les consommations d’energie en batiment d’elelevage laitier. Reperes de consommations et pistes d’economies. Collection: Synthese, Janvier.
- Jakel, K. (2003). Analyse der Elektroenergieanwendungund Einsparpotentialeam BeispielsachsischerMilchviehanlagen. Forschungsbericht Agrartechnik, 414, Mertin-Luther-Universitat Halle/Saale.
- Kumar, D., Noori, T. and Kumar, M. (2016).Studies on existing mechanization status for fodder and crop in Rajendra Agricultural University region, PUSA, Bihar, India. International Conference on Emerging Technologies in Agricultural and food engineering 27-30 December, 2016. Agricultural and food Engineering Department, IIT Kharagpur, e-Proceedings pp 210-216.
- Kumar, D. and Kumar, M. (2017). Identification of mechanization gaps for different farm operations for fodder and crop cultivation in Pusa (Bihar) region. Internat. J. Fore. & Crop Improv., 8 (1) : 16-22, DOI: 10.15740/HAS/IJFCI/8.1/17-23.
- Laningham-Foster, L., Nysee, L.I. and Levine, J.A. (2003). Labour saved, calories lost: the energetic impact of domestic labor-saving devices. Obes. Res., 11 (10) : 1178–1181.
- Lei, V., Noussair, C.N. and Plott, C.R. (2001). Nonspeculative bubbles in experimental asset markets: Lack of common knowledge of rationality vs. actual irrationality. Econometrica, 69(4) : 831-859.
- Ludington, D. and Johnson, E. (2003). Dairy farm energy audit summary report. Energy Research and Development Authority. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.
- Olafadehan, O.A. (2013). Feeding value of Pterocarpus erinaceus for growing goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 185 : 1–8.
- Otsuka, K. (2013). Food insecurity, income inequality, and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture. Agril. Econ., 44 : 7–18.
- Rossi, P. and Gastaldo, A. (2012). Consumi energetici in allevamenti bovini da latte. Inf. Agrar., 3 (Suppl) : 45–47.
- Rotz, C.A., Montes, F. and Chianese, D.S. (2010). The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment. J. Dairy Sci., 93 : 1266–1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2162.
- Saha, R., Chaudhary, R.S. and Somasundaram, J. (2012). Soil health management under hill agroecosystem of North East India. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1155/2012/696174.
- Yearbook, F.S. (2013). World food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2013.
- http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=136849.