Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Manjunath, H.
- Physico-Chemical and Thermal Properties of Different Biomass Material Selected for Thermal Gasification
Abstract Views :235 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
2 Department of R.E.E., College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
3 Department of REE, College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
4 Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru (Karnatak), IN
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
2 Department of R.E.E., College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
3 Department of REE, College of Agricultural Engineering (UAS), Raichur (Karnatak), IN
4 Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru (Karnatak), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 11, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 276-281Abstract
Agricultural and forest biomass material were reported to be the potential feedstock for gasification by various researchers. The physical, chemical and thermal properties of biomass material play very important role in order to characterize the feedstock for energy conversion process. The physical properties (moisture content and bulk density), chemical properties (volatile matter content, ash content and total carbon content) and thermal properties (calorific value) of selected agricultural and forest biomass viz., pigeonpea stalk (Cajanus cajan), cotton stalk (Gossypium hirsutum) and vilaytee babool (Prosopis juliflora) for different length of sizes ranging from 25-50, 50-75 and 75-100 mm were determined using standard procedures. The moisture content of pigeonpea stalk, cotton stalk and vilaytee babool were found to be 3.28, 6.98 and 9.45 per cent, respectively. While the bulk density of these feed stock were reported to be 501, 465 and 556 kg m-3, respectively. The volatile matter content, ash content and total carbon content of pigeonpea stalk were 80.67, 1.39 and 17.94 per cent, respectively. While for cotton stalk these were 80.20, 1.43 and 18.37 per cent. Whereas, vilaytee babool these were 80.81, 1.83 and 17.36 per cent, respectively. The calorific value of 16.44, 16.05 and 17.49 MJ kg-1was observed for pigeonpea, cotton stalk and vilaytee babool, respectively. The results obtained from the study indicated that the selected agricultural and forest biomass material were found to be potential for thermal gasification.Keywords
Ash Content, Biomass Material, Bulk Density, Calorific Value, Total Carbon Content, Volatile Matter Content.
References
- Ahmad, F., Daud, A.W., Ahmad, M.A. and Radzi, R. (2013). The effects of acid leaching on porosity and surface functional groups of cocoa shell based activated carbon. Chem. Engg. Res. Des., 91(6): 1028-1038.
- Birwatkar, V.R., Khandetod, Y.P., Mohod, A.G. and Dhande, K.G. (2014). Physical and thermal properties of biomass briquetted fuel. Indian J. Sci. Res. Tech.,2(4): 55-62.
- Faaji (2001). An efficiency and economy of wood-fired biomass energy systems in relation to scale regarding heat and power generation using combustion and gasification technologies. Bio. Bioe.,21(2): 91-108.
- Fischer, G. and Schrattenholzer, L. (2001).Global bioenergy potentials through 2050. Biom. Bioe., 20 (8) : 151-159.
- Garge, A. and Sharma, M.P. (2013). Performance evaluation of gasifier engine system using different feed stocks. Internat. J. Emer. Tech. Adv. Engg., 3(6): 188-191.
- Kumar, A.N., Kumar, N.A., Baredar, A.P. and Shukla, A.B. (2015). A review on biomass energy resources, potential, conversion and policy in India, Renew. Sust. Envir., 45(19): 530-539.
- Khardiwar, M.S., Dubey, A.K., Mahalle, D.M. and Kumar, S. (2014). Study on physical and chemical properties of crop residues briquettes for gasification. Internat. J. Renew. Ener. Tech. Res., 2 (11): 237-248.
- Ladan, J.N., Sokhansanj, S., Mani, S., Hoque, M. and Bi, T. (2006). Cost and performance of woody biomass size reduction for energy production. Can. Socie. Bioeng., 6 (4): 1-13.
- Mishra, P., Singh, P. and Baredar, P. (2010). Impact of moisture level in atmosphere on biomass gasification a bio energy for sustainable development. Internat. J. Envir.Sci.,1(4): 640-644.
- Parikka, M. (2004). Global biomass fuel resources. Bio Bioe., 27: 613-620.
- Rao, M.S., Singh, S.P., Sodha, M.S., Dubey, A.K. and Shyam, M. (2004). Stoichiometric, mass, energy and energy balance analysis of counter current fixed bed gasification of postconsumer residues. Bio. Bioe., 27(2) : 155-171.
- Shinde, V.B. and Singarvelu, M. (2014). Thermo gravimetric analysis of biomass stalk for briquetting. J. Envion. Res. Dev., 9(1): 151-160.
- Tomar, S.S. (1995). Status of biogas plants in India-An overview. Ener. Sust. Dev.,1(5): 53-56.